Arizona · Peoria

Family Matters II.

Care Facility5 bedsDementia-trained staff(623) 572-2590
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 41% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Peoria
A 5-bed Care Facility with 4 citations on file.
Licensed beds
5
Last inspection
Jun 2026
Last citation
May 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A small home, reviewed on public record.

Family Matters II

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Family Matters II
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
34th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
43rd%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: MAY 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
MAY 2025
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

4 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D4
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

2
reports on file
4
total deficiencies
2026-06-04
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Family Matters II, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

2025-05-22
Complaint Investigation
R9-10-807.B.1 · 4 findings
R9-10-807.B.1A.A.C. § RR9-10-807.B.1
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-807.B.1

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that before or at the time of acceptance of an individual, the individual submitted documentation that was dated within 90 calendar days before the individual was accepted by the assisted living facility and included whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, and was dated and signed by a physician, registered nurse practitioner, registered nurse, or physician assistant for one of two residents sampled.  Findings include: 1. A review of R2's medical records revealed no documentation to indicate whether R2 required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, dated and signed by a physician, registered nurse practitioner, registered nurse, or physician assistant. Based on the resident's date of acceptance, this documentation was required. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that the medical record for R2 did not include the required documentation dated within 90 calendar days before R2 was accepted by the assisted living facility.

R9-10-807.EA.A.C. § RR9-10-807.E
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-807.E

Based record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that within five working days after a resident's acceptance by the assisted living facility, the documented agreement required in subsection (D), was signed by the resident's representative, the resident's legal guardian, or another individual who has been designated by the individual under A.R.S. § 36-3221 to make health care decisions on the individual's behalf, for one of two residents sampled.   Findings include:    1. A review of R2's medical record revealed R2 received directed care services. Further review revealed a residency agreement with all required elements. However, the resident agreement was not signed by the resident's representative, the resident's legal guardian, or another individual designated by the resident. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R2's medical records did not include a residency agreement signed by the resident's representative, the resident's legal guardian, or another individual who has been designated by the resident, within five days of R2's acceptance into the facility.

R9-10-815.F.2A.A.C. § RR9-10-815.F.2
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-815.F.2

Based on record review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that there was a means of exiting the facility that controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility.   Findings include:      1. During an environmental tour of the facility, the Compliance Officers observed three sliding back doors leading to the back yard. However, none of the doors had a control or alerted employees of the egress of residents from the facility. The facility is licensed for directed care services. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged there was no means of exiting the facility that controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility.

R9-10-819.A.2A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.2
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.2

Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a pest control program that complied with A.A.C. R3-8-201(C)(4) was implemented and effective. The deficient practice posed a potential risk to residents. Findings include: 1. R3-8-201.C.4. stated "C. Applicator licensure. 4. An individual may not provide pest management services at a school, child care facility, health care institution, or food-handling establishment unless the individual is a certified applicator in the certification category for which services are being provided." 2. Review of the facility Maintenance log revealed pest control was not documented in the years of 2024 to current day. 3. The Compliance Officers observed a spray bottle of Hot Shot Bed Bug Killer that E1 brought to them. 4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged E1 does the facility’s pest control and E1 reported that he uses the spray bottle mentioned above along the baseboards. E1 reported E1 was not a licensed applicator 5. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the facility did not utilize a pest control program compliant with A.A.C. R3-8-201(C)(4).

1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.

Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.