Arizona · Mesa

Touch of Love Assisted Living.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(480) 380-4600
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 20% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Mesa
A 10-bed Care Facility with 2 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Jul 2026
Last citation
Jun 2024
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Touch of Love Assisted Living

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Touch of Love Assisted Living
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
68th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
73rd%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
No citation activity in this window.
peer median
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

2 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D2
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

2
reports on file
2
total deficiencies
2026-07-22
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Touch of Love Assisted Living, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

2024-06-13
Annual Compliance Visit
A.A.C. · 2 findings
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review, observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure the caregiver documented the services provided in the resident's medical record, for two of two residents reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk as services could not be verified as provided against a service plan. Findings include: 1. Review of R1's medical record revealed a current written service plan for directed care services dated April 25, 2024. This service plan stated the following service was needed: "Skin Care: Hydrate skin with lotion or oil ." However, documentation was not available indicating this service was provided. 2. Review of R2's medical record revealed a current written service plan for personal care services dated April 20, 2024. This service plan stated the following service was needed: "Skin Care: Hydrate skin with lotion or oil. Turn resident every 2-3 hours to prevent skin breakdown or pressure." However, documentation was not available indicating these services were provided. 3. During an interview, E1 acknowledged R1's and R2's medical records did not include documentation of skin care.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure there was a means of exiting the facility for a resident who did not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort, that provided access to an outside area, and controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident. Findings include: 1. Review of Department documentation revealed the facility was authorized to provide directed care services. 2. During the facility tour, the Compliance Officer observed the door leading out to the backyard from R2's bedroom. The outside area, in the backyard, allowed residents to be at least 30 feet away from the facility. The door was not equipped with a device that alerted caregivers of the egress of a resident. 3. In an interview, E1 reported that the camera in R2's bedroom alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility, however, the monitor screen for the camera did not show the door or make sound when the door was opened.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.