Arizona · Mesa

Allegiance Assisted Living LLC.

Care Facility6 bedsDementia-trained staff(480) 330-9018
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 34% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Mesa
A 6-bed Care Facility with 4 citations on file.
Licensed beds
6
Last inspection
Oct 2025
Last citation
Oct 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A small home, reviewed on public record.

Allegiance Assisted Living LLC

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Allegiance Assisted Living LLC
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
38th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
60th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: OCT 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
OCT 2025
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

4 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D4
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

2
reports on file
4
total deficiencies
2025-10-06
Annual Compliance Visit
R9-10-820.A.14 · 1 finding

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Allegiance Assisted Living LLC, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

R9-10-820.A.14A.A.C. § RR9-10-820.A.14
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-820.A.14

Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a cat was vaccinated against rabies. The deficient posed a risk if a cat allowed into the facility did not meet the vaccination requirements. Findings include: 1. During the environmental inspection, the Compliance Officers observed O1. 2. A review of the pet records revealed no documentation of a rabies vaccination for O1. 3. During the exit interview, the findings were discussed with E1 and no additional information was provided.

2023-09-26
Annual Compliance Visit
A.A.C. · 3 findings
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review and interview, the health care institution failed to administer a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery. The deficient practice posed a risk if a staff member was unable to assist a resident who had fallen. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed a document labeled "Fall prevention and recovery training programs." The program stated "All employees will have an initial training on fall prevention and recovery. After initial training, all employees will be required to attend continuing competency training on fall prevention and recovery at least every 12 months. Completion of the training shall be documented and included in the employee files." 2. A review of E1's personnel record revealed documented fall prevention and recovery training dated May 2022. However, E1's personnel record did not include a current annual training for fall prevention and recovery as required per the documented program. 3. A review of E2's personnel record revealed documented fall prevention and recovery training dated May 2022. However, E2's personnel record did not include a current annual training for fall prevention and recovery as required per the documented program. 4. In a joint interview, E1 and E2 acknowledged the documented fall prevention and recovery training program was not administered.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure policies and procedures were reviewed at least once every three years and updated as needed. The deficient practice posed a risk as policies and procedures reinforce and clarify standards expected of employees. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's policy and procedure manual revealed documentation indicating the policies and procedures were last reviewed by the former owner on June 25, 2006. No additional documentation was available indicating the policies and procedures were reviewed at least once every three years. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged documentation was not available to indicate the facility's policies and procedures were reviewed at least once every three years.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's written service plan was developed with assistance and review from the resident or resident's representative, for two of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the service plan was not developed to articulate decisions and agreements related to resident care. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a service plan dated in September 2023, for directed care services. However, the service plan did not include the signature of R1 or R1's representative to show the service plan was developed with assistance and review by R1 or by R1's representative. 2. A review of R2's medical record revealed a service plan dated in November 2022, for personal care services. However, the service plan did not include the signature of R2 or R2's representative to show the service plan was developed with assistance and review by R2 or by R2's representative. 3. In a joint interview, E1 and E2 acknowledged the service plans for R1 and R2 were not signed to indicate the service plans were developed with assistance and review by the residents or their representatives.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.