Sunny Days Senior Living.

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
5 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
5 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2026-06-29Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2025-06-16Annual Compliance VisitA.A.C. · 5 findings
“Based on record review, document review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that vaccinations for influenza and pneumonia were available to residents on site on a yearly basis. Findings include: 1 . A review of R1's and R2's medical records revealed no documentation offered for the influenza and pneumonia vaccinations on a yearly basis. 2 . In an interview, E1 acknowledged that the influenza and pneumonia vaccinations were not offered on a yearly basis.”
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that there was a training program that included initial training and continued competency training for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery. Findings include: 1 . A review of E3's employee file revealed no documentation of fall prevention and fall recovery training. 2 . In an interview, E1 acknowledged there was no document for E3 regarding training for fall prevention and fall recovery.”
“Based on record review, document review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that annual training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of infectious tuberculosis were provided to individuals employed by the health care institution, and annually assessing the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious tuberculosis. Findings include: 1 . A review of E2's and E3's employee records revealed no documentation regarding the training for signs and symptoms of Tuberculosis. 2 . A review of facility documents revealed, no document for the facility's risk of exposure to infectious tuberculosis. 3 . In an interview, E1 acknowledged that E2 and E3 did not have the required training for signs and symptoms of Tuberculosis and that there was no document for the facility's risk of exposure to infectious tuberculosis.”
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident's privacy was protected. Findings include: 1 . During the environmental tour of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed a home health caregiver providing personal care to a resident. However, the door to the resident's room was wide open, no privacy curtain was used, and the resident's buttocks were exposed. 2 . In an interview, E1 acknowledged that the resident's privacy was not protected.”
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a smoke detector was installed in each bedroom of the assisted living facility. Findings include: 1 . During a tour of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed a bedroom with a sign that read, "Staff Only", for the live-in caregiver. However, the room did not have a smoke detector. 2 . In an interview, E1 acknowledged that there was no smoke detector in the bedroom used by the live-in caregiver.”
2024-01-31Complaint InvestigationNo findings
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Mesa.
Other memory care facilities near Mesa with similar care offerings.
Facility Watch · Premium
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

