Arizona · Mesa

Pleasant Ville Assisted Living Home LLC.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(480) 272-8202
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 29% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Mesa
A 10-bed Care Facility with 4 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Nov 2024
Last citation
Nov 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Pleasant Ville Assisted Living Home LLC

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Pleasant Ville Assisted Living Home LLC
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
54th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
60th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: NOV 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
NOV 2025
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

4 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D4
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

3
reports on file
4
total deficiencies
2025-11-28
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 2 findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Pleasant Ville Assisted Living Home LLC, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review and interview, the assisted living home failed to maintain written documentation of emergency responder (EMS) information that included the items listed in Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 36-420.04(A)(1-9) for four of four residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the emergency responder was not aware of critical health information for the resident. Findings include:  1. A review of R1, R2, R3 and R4’s medical records revealed a standardized form that did not include the following: The name, address and telephone number of the resident's current pharmacy; The name and contact information for the resident's primary care physician; The point-of-contact information for the assisted living center or assisted living home; and A copy of the resident's health insurance portability and accountability act release authorizing a receiving hospital to communicate with the assisted living home to plan for the resident's discharge.  2. In an exit interview, findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.

R9-10-815.F.2A.A.C. § RR9-10-815.F.2
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-815.F.2

Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure an assisted living facility authorized to provide directed care services provided access to an outside area that monitored or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident. Findings include: 1. Documentation review revealed that the facility was licensed at the directed care level. 2. During an environmental inspection, the Compliance Officer observed sliding doors located in two separate residents' rooms of the facility. Each room was assigned as a private room. The doors did not have an egress alert or a monitoring system. Each door provided access to the patio and backyard. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were discussed with E1, and no further information was provided.

2024-11-14
Other Visit
No findings
2023-12-20
Annual Compliance Visit
A.A.C. · 2 findings
A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure an individual submitted documentation dated within 90 calendar days before the individual was accepted by the facility including whether the individual required restraints for two of two residents sampled. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's and R2's medical records revealed a document titled "Admission Orders." This document was signed by a medical practitioner within 90 calendar days before admission and stated each resident did not require continuous medical services or continuous nursing services. However, the document did not state whether each resident required restraints. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the admissions form provided by the facility for R1 and for R2 did not include the required verbiage stating whether the resident required restraints.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure the hot water temperature was maintained between 95 \'b0F and 120 \'b0F in areas of the assisted living facility used by residents. Findings include: 1. During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed the hot water temperature measured at 124.5\'b0 F in a shared bathroom. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the hot water temperature had not been maintained between 95 \'b0F and 120 \'b0F in areas of the assisted living facility used by residents.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.