Loving Hearts Assisted Living, LLC.

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
on file.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
4 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2026-07-10Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2026-06-12Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2026-01-30Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2025-06-12Complaint InvestigationR9-10-815.F.2 · 4 findings
“Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, for a facility that provided directed care services, the manager failed to ensure there was a means of exiting the facility that provided access to an outside area which controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident. Findings include: 1) Review of Department documentation revealed the facility was authorized to provide directed care services. 2) During the facility tour, the Compliance Officer observed a door leading to the backyard and a door leading outside to the side of the home. Both doors did not control or alert employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. 3) In an interview, E4 acknowledged there was not a means of exiting the facility that controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident.”
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that medication administered to a resident was accurately documented in the resident's medical record, for three of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was provided false or misleading information. Findings include: 1) Review of R1's medical record revealed R1 received medication administration. 2) Review of R1's medication administration record (MAR) for June 2025 revealed documentation that the following medications were administered at 8:00 PM on June 12, 2025 (the day of the inspection): -Albuterol 100/IPRATRO 20 CG; -Carbidopa 25/Levodopa 100 mg; and -Trazdone 50 mg. However, the MAR documentation was provided for the Compliance Officer at 1:55 PM. 3) Review of R2's MAR for June 2025 revealed documentation that the following medication was administered at 7:00 PM on June 12, 2025: -Trazodone 50 MG. However, the MAR documentation was provided for the Compliance Officer at 1:55 PM. 4) Review of R3's MAR for June 2025 revealed documentation that the following medications were administered at 7:00 PM on June 12, 2025: -Lorazepam 0.50mg; -Trazadone 100 mg tablet; -Seroquel Fumarate 25 MG; and -Mucas Relief tab 600 MG. However, the MAR documentation was provided for the Compliance Officer at 1:55 PM. 5) In an interview, E4 acknowledged R1's, R2's, and R3's medical records did not contain accurate documentation of medication administered to R1, R2, and R3.”
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure poisonous or toxic materials stored by the facility were stored in a locked area and inaccessible to residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of residents with access to the materials. Findings include: 1) During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed a container of Ajax bleach and Ajax dish soap in an unlocked cabinet under the kitchen sink. 2) In an interview, E4 acknowledged the toxic materials were not stored in a locked area and inaccessible to residents.”
“Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a pet was licensed consistent with local ordinances and vaccinated against rabies. The deficient practice posed a risk if a dog allowed into the facility did not meet the Maricopa County licensing requirements. Findings include: 1) During the facility tour, the Compliance Officer observed O1 on the premises. 2) In documentation review, the facility did not have documentation O1 was licensed following the local ordinance, which was required annually by Maricopa County. Further review revealed a document titled "Rabies Vaccination Certificate". However, the certificate had an expiration date of June 14, 2024. 3) In an interview, E4 acknowledged the facility did not have documentation O1 was licensed consistent with local ordinances and O1 rabies vaccination was expired.”
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Mesa.
Other memory care facilities near Mesa with similar care offerings.
Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

