Arizona · Mesa

Jim and Patti Jones Assisted Living Home III.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(480) 748-7971
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 16% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Mesa
A 10-bed Care Facility with 2 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Last citation
Jun 2024
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Jim and Patti Jones Assisted Living Home III

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Jim and Patti Jones Assisted Living Home III
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
68th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
No routine inspections
on file.
Deficiencies per inspection.

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
No citation activity in this window.
peer median
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

2 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D2
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

1
reports on file
2
total deficiencies
2024-06-12
Complaint Investigation
A.A.C. · 2 findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Jim and Patti Jones Assisted Living Home III, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's medical record was protected from loss, damage, or unauthorized use. The deficient practice posed a risk of protected and sensitive resident health information being disclosed without the resident's consent or knowledge. Findings include: 1. A.R.S. \'a7 12-2291(6) "Medical records" means all communications related to a patient's physical or mental health or condition that are recorded in any form or medium and that are maintained for purposes of patient diagnosis or treatment, including medical records that are prepared by a health care provider or by other providers. 2. During the environmental tour, the Compliance Officer observed resident medical records sitting unsecured on several bookshelves situated along the right-hand side of a room accessible from the facility's entrance. Additionally, the Compliance Officer observed electronic medical records were displayed on an unattended computer screen within the same room. 3. A review of facility documentation revealed a policy titled "Medical record Maintenance," the policy stated "A manager shall ensure that a resident's medical record is protected from loss, damage or unauthorized use." 4. In an interview, E1 and E2 acknowledged resident medical records were not protected from loss, damage, or unauthorized use.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, for a facility authorized to provide directed care services, the manager failed to ensure there was a means of exiting the facility that provided access to an outside area from which a resident could exit to a location at least 30 feet away from the facility and controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if facility staff were unaware of the egress of a resident from the facility. Findings include: 1. A review of Department records revealed the facility was licensed to provide directed care services. 2. During the environmental tour, the Compliance Officer observed the front door leading to the street from the facility. However, the door was not secured and the door chime was not functioning. 3. During the environmental tour, the Compliance Officer observed the door leading out to the backyard from R3's bedroom. The outside area, in the backyard, allowed residents to be at least 30 feet away from the facility. The door was not equipped with a device that alerted caregivers of the egress of a resident. 4. During the environmental tour, the Compliance Officer observed a french door located in the living room leading to the back yard. The outside area, in the backyard, allowed residents to be at least 30 feet away from the facility. However, the door was not secured and the door chime was not functioning. 5. During the environmental tour, the Compliance Officer observed a door located between a hallway and resident rooms leading to the back yard. The outside area, in the backyard, allowed residents to be at least 30 feet away from the facility. However, the door was not secured and the door chime was not functioning. 6. A review of facility documentation revealed a policy titled "Protocol For Wandering Residents," the policy stated "There is a means of existing the Facility ... Provides access to an outside area that allows the residents to be at least 30 feet away from the facility, and controls or alerts personnel of the egress of a resident from the facility." 7. In an interview, E1 and E2 acknowledged a means of exiting the facility to an outside area did not control or alert employees of the egress of a resident from the facility.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.