Embrace Assisted Living, LLC.

A small home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
4 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2025-12-03Annual Compliance VisitR9-10-806.A.10 · 4 findings
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided current documentation of first aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training before providing assisted living services, for one of two caregivers reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk if a caregiver was unable to meet a resident's needs during an emergency. Findings include: 1. A review of E2's personnel record revealed E2 worked as a caregiver and had a hire date of July 2, 2021. The personnel record revealed a first aid and CPR card with an expiration date of June 12, 2025. There was no other current documentation of first aid and CPR training in E2's record. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged E2 did not have current documentation of first aid and CPR training. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided.”
“Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a TB exposure risk to residents. Findings include: 1. R9-10-113.A states, "If a health care institution is subject to the requirements of this Section, as specified in an Article in this Chapter, the health care institution's chief administrative officer shall ensure that the health care institution establishes, documents, and implements tuberculosis infection control activities that...2. Include: a. For each individual who is employed by the health care institution, provides volunteer services for the health care institution, or is admitted to the health care institution and who is subject to the requirements of this Section, screening, on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter, that consists of: i. Assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious tuberculosis, ii. Determining if the individual has signs or symptoms of tuberculosis, and iii. Obtaining documentation of the individual's freedom from infectious tuberculosis according to subsection (B)(1)..." 2. A review of R1's medical record revealed no documentation of a risk assessment of prior exposure to infectious TB or a determination if R1 had signs or symptoms of TB. Based on R2's date of acceptance, this documentation was required. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided.”
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a service plan was signed and dated by the resident or the resident's representative when the service plan was initially developed or when updated, for one of two sampled residents. Findings include: 1. A review of R2's medical record did not include documentation R2's service plan was signed and dated by the resident or the resident's representative for the service plan dated October 1, 2025. 2. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.”
“Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a disaster drill for employees was conducted on each shift at least once every three months and documented. The deficient practice posed a risk if employees were unable to implement a disaster plan. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's disaster drill documentation revealed documentation of a disaster drill conducted on July 4, 2025. However, documentation of additional drills was not available for review. 2. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.”
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Mesa.
Other memory care facilities near Mesa with similar care offerings.
Tour Prep
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

