Arizona · Maricopa

Maxcare Assisted Living Home.

Care Facility5 bedsDementia-trained staff(602) 512-1338
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 49% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Maricopa
A 5-bed Care Facility with 6 citations on file.
Licensed beds
5
Last inspection
May 2026
Last citation
Mar 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A small home, reviewed on public record.

Maxcare Assisted Living Home

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Maxcare Assisted Living Home
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
22nd%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
32nd%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

6 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: MAR 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
MAR 2025
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

6 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D6
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

2
reports on file
6
total deficiencies
2026-05-26
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Maxcare Assisted Living Home, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

2025-03-21
Complaint Investigation
R9-10-807.B.1 · 6 findings
R9-10-807.B.1A.A.C. § RR9-10-807.B.1
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-807.B.1

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident accepted by the assisted living facility submitted documentation signed by a medical practitioner or a registered nurse that stated whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, for two of two residents reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs.   Findings include:   1. A review of R1's medical record revealed no documentation that stated whether the resident required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints. Based on R1's acceptance date, this document was required.  2. A review of R2's medical record revealed documentation that stated whether the resident required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints. However, this documentation was not signed and dated by a medical practitioner or a registered nurse. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R1's and R2's medical records did not contain documentation signed by a medical practitioner or a registered nurse that stated whether the resident required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints.

R9-10-808.A.3.cA.A.C. § RR9-10-808.A.3.c
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-808.A.3.c

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's written service plan included the amount, type, and frequency of assisted living services provided, for one of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as the service plans did not reinforce and clarify services to be provided to a resident.   Findings include:     1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a service plan dated December 14, 2024. The service plan stated, "[R2] cannot bear weight, Night care needs turning and repositioning.” However, there was no documentation of the frequency of repositioning R1.   2. In an interview, E1 and E2 reported R1 was unable to ambulate and the staff repositioned R1 every 2 hours. E1 and E2 acknowledged R1's written service plan did not include the frequency of the turning and repositioning provided to R1.

R9-10-808.A.5.aA.A.C. § RR9-10-808.A.5.a
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-808.A.5.a

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a written service plan included the signature and date from the resident or representative, for one of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk if the resident or representative did not acknowledge the services that were to be provided. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a written service plan for personal care services dated December 14, 2024. However, the service plan did not include a signature and date from the resident or representative. 2. In an interview, E1 and E2 acknowledged R1's service plan did not include a signature and date from the resident or representative.

R9-10-808.A.5.cA.A.C. § RR9-10-808.A.5.c
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-808.A.5.c

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a written service plan included the signature and date from a nurse or medical practitioner, for one of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the service plan was not developed to articulate decisions and agreements. Findings include: 1. A review of R2's medical record revealed written service plans for personal care services dated for September 09, 2024 and February 25, 2025. The service plans indicated R2 received medication administration including opioids; however, these service plans were not signed and dated by a nurse or medical practitioner. 2. In an interview, E1 and E2 acknowledged R2's service plans did not include a signature and date from a nurse or medical practitioner.

R9-10-808.C.1.gA.A.C. § RR9-10-808.C.1.g
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-808.C.1.g

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or an assistant caregiver documented the services provided to a resident in the resident's medical record, for one of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as services could not be verified as provided against a service plan.   Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a service plan dated December 14, 2024. The service plan stated, "[R2] cannot bear weight, Night care needs turning and repositioning.” However, the March 2025 activities of daily living (ADL) sheet revealed no documentation of turning and repositioning R1. 2. In an interview, E1 and E2 reported R1 was unable to ambulate and the staff repositioned R1 every 2 hours. E1 and E2 acknowledged R1's medical record did not include documentation of turning and repositioning R1.

A.A.C.
Verbatim citation text

Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, for three of three residents sampled, the facility failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident that included the information prescribed in A.R.S. 36-420.04. The deficient practice posed a risk as required patient information was not prepared in case of an emergency. Findings include: 1. A.R.S. 36-420.04.A states, "A. An assisted living center or assisted living home that contacts an emergency responder on behalf of a resident shall provide to the emergency responder a written document that includes all of the following: 1. The reason or reasons the emergency responder was requested on behalf of the resident. 2. Whether the resident receives medication services and, if the resident has provided this information to the assisted living center or assisted living home, a list of all the resident's prescription and over-the-counter medications, their dosages and how frequently they are administered. 3. The name, address and telephone number of the resident's current pharmacy. 4. A list of any known allergies to any medications, additives, preservatives or materials like latex or adhesive. 5. The name and contact information for the resident's primary care physician and power of attorney or authorized representative. 6. Basic information about the resident's physical and mental conditions and basic medical history, such as having diabetes or a pacemaker or experiencing frequent falls or cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, as well as dates of recent episodes, if known. 7. The point-of-contact information for the assisted living center or assisted living home, including the telephone number, if available, cell phone number and email address. A point of contact must be available to respond to questions regarding the information provided twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. 8. A copy of the resident's health insurance portability and accountability act (HIPAA) release authorizing a receiving hospital to communicate with the assisted living center or assisted living home to plan for the resident's discharge. This paragraph does not preclude a resident from revoking the resident's health insurance portability and accountability act release authorization. 9. A copy of the resident's advance directives, if any, on file at the assisted living center or assisted living home. This paragraph does not preclude a resident from revoking or modifying the resident's advance directives." 2. A review of R1's, R2's, and R3's medical records revealed no documentation of the completed emergency responder patient information documentation required in Arizona Revised Statute (A.R.S.) § 36-420.04(A)(1) through (9).   3. In an interview, E1 and E2 acknowledged the information required in A.R.S. § 36-420.04 was not prepared in a standardized emergency responder patient information form as required.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.