Arizona · Litchfield Park

Villa Serene Assisted Living II.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(623) 980-8995
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 30% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Litchfield Park
A 10-bed Care Facility with 3 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Mar 2025
Last citation
Apr 2026
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
59th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
50th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: APR 2026. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
APR 2026
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

3 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D3
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

2
reports on file
3
total deficiencies
2026-04-16
Complaint Investigation
R9-10-811.C · 1 finding

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Villa Serene Assisted Living II, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

R9-10-811.CA.A.C. § RR9-10-811.C
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-811.C

Based on interview and documentation review, the manager failed to ensure a medical record contained the requirements in R9-10.811.C.1-24, for one of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as the required information could not be verified. Findings include: 1. In an interview, E1 reported R3 was a resident of the facility in 2024. However, E1 was unable to provide R3's admission or discharge dates. 2. An "Onsite Compliance Inspection Document Request" was completed at 10:00AM on April 16, 2026 requesting R1's, R2's, and R3's medical records. However, R3's medical record was not provided for review. 3. In an interview, E1 reported R3's medical record was in storage and was not available.  4. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided.

2025-03-07
Annual Compliance Visit
R9-10-815.B.1 · 2 findings
R9-10-815.B.1A.A.C. § RR9-10-815.B.1
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-815.B.1

Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager retained a resident who was confined to a bed or chair because of an inability to ambulate even with assistance, without meeting the requirements in R9-814(B)(2), for one of two residents sampled who received directed care services. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs. Findings include: 1. R9-10-814(B)(2) states, "A manager of an assisted living facility authorized to provide personal care services may accept or retain a resident who is confined to a bed or chair because of an inability to ambulate even with assistance if: the resident's primary care provider... examines the resident... at least once every six months throughout the duration of the resident's condition; reviews the assisted living facility's scope of services; and signs and dates a determination stating that the resident's needs can be met by the assisted living facility..." 2. A review of R1's updated service plan dated January 10, 2025, revealed R1 received directed care services. 3. A review of R1's medical record contained a document titled "Initial Physician Recommendation Form," dated July 30, 2024. This document stated R1 was confined to a bed or chair (bedbound). Based on this date, further documentation was required. 4.In an interview, E1 acknowledged that R1's medical record did not include the required determination per R9-10-814(B)(2), updated at least once every six months.

R9-10-816.B.3.bA.A.C. § RR9-10-816.B.3.b
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-816.B.3.b

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure medications were administered to a resident in compliance with a medication order, for one of two residents reviewed. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to residents if the facility did not administer medications in compliance with a medication order and a resident did not receive medication as ordered.   Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a medication order dated February 28, 2025. The order stated, "Stopped [sic] Tamsulosin 0.4mg capsule: Take 1 capsule by mouth once a day." 2. A review of R1's medical record revealed a Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March 2025. The MAR reported Tamsulosin 0.4mg was administered from March 1, 2025, to March 6, 2025, inclusively. 3. The Compliance Officers observed a medication organizer and a bottle of Tamsulosin medication. The medication organizer contained the Tamsulosin pills for the remaining days of the week. 4. In an interview, E1 reported that many of R1's medications were stopped. E1 acknowledged R1 was not administered medication in compliance with the medication orders located in R1's medical record.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.