Silver Springs.

A large home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 116 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
2 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
5 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2025-12-30Other VisitNo findings
2025-07-21Other VisitNo findings
2025-07-21Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2024-08-01Complaint InvestigationA.A.C. · 2 findings
“Based on document review, observation, and interview, for a facility authorized to provide directed care services, the manager failed to ensure there was a means of exiting the facility that controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a potential elopement risk to residents. Findings include: 1. A review of Department documentation revealed the facility was licensed for 107 directed care level beds. 2. During the inspection, the Compliance Officer observed the premises was not secured. The Compliance Officer observed the residential units open directly to the facility grounds. The Compliance Officer observed no system to alert employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. 3. In an interview, E1 reported the facility did not accept directed care residents and was unsure why the facility had a license for directed care. 4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the facility was authorized to provide directed care services and did not have a means to control egress or alert employees of the egress of a resident from the facility.”
“Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order, for two of seven resident records reviewed. Findings include: 1. A review of R3's medical record revealed a signed medication order, dated July 22, 2024, for Trazadone 50 mg - Take 25 mg by mouth Qhs". 2. A review of R3's medical record revealed a Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated July 2024. The MAR revealed Trazadone (half tablet) 25MG was administered at 8pm and at 9pm on July 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, and 31, 2024. 3. A review of R7's medical record revealed a signed medication order, dated July 12, 2024, for "Novolog Insulin, Inject 5 units 10 minutes before lunch unless blood sugar is below 100, hold until Dinner, check blood sugar and give 5 units if above 100." 4. A review of R7's MAR dated July 2024, revealed R7 was administered 5 units of insulin, on July 21, 2024 at 4:30pm when R7's blood sugar was 97 and on July 22, 2024 at 11:30amwhen R7's blood sugar was 95. Further review revealed on July 29, 2024 R7's blood sugar was 101 and E2 held the insulin. 5. In an interview, E1 acknowledged medications had not been administered to R3 and R7 in compliance with the medication orders.”
2024-03-08Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Other facilities in Green Valley.
Other memory care facilities near Green Valley with similar care offerings.
Facility Watch · Premium
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
Villas at Green Valley, Villa F
Green Valley
Haven Springs at Green Valley
Green Valley
Villas at Green Valley, Villa J
Green Valley
Arroyo Gardens Independent and Assisted Living
Green Valley
Casa de Sonshine Assisted Living, LLC
Green Valley
Prestige Assisted Living at Green Valley
Green Valley
Villas at Green Valley, Villa G
Green Valley
Villas at Green Valley, Villa D
Green Valley



