Arizona · Goodyear

Supreme Care at Goodyear LLC.

Care Facility10 bedsDementia-trained staff(480) 343-8045
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 27% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Goodyear
A 10-bed Care Facility with 4 citations on file.
Licensed beds
10
Last inspection
Feb 2026
Last citation
Feb 2026
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Supreme Care at Goodyear LLC

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Supreme Care at Goodyear LLC
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
54th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
65th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: FEB 2026. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
FEB 2026
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

4 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D4
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

3
reports on file
4
total deficiencies
2026-02-06
Annual Compliance Visit
R9-10-803.A.3.b · 4 findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Supreme Care at Goodyear LLC, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

R9-10-803.A.3.bA.A.C. § RR9-10-803.A.3.b
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-803.A.3.b

Based on documentation review, observation, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to designate, in writing, a manager who had either a certificate as an assisted living facility manager issued under Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 36-446.04(C), or a temporary certificate as an assisted living facility manager issued under A.R.S. § 36-446.06. The deficient practice posed a risk if the assisted living facility was unable to ensure compliance with applicable Rules.   Findings include:   1. A review of Department documentation revealed an email stating E2 resigned as manager December 31, 2025. 2. The Compliance Officers observed E2’s manager’s license hanging on the wall of the facility.  3. A review of E2’s personnel file revealed E2’s hire date as February 1, 2025, and “date ended” as December 31, 2025. 4. A review of the Board of Examiners for Nursing Care Institution Administrators and Assisted Living Facility Managers (NCIA Board) registry revealed E2’s “Facility Appointments” did not list the current facility.  5. In an interview, E1 reported E2 was rehired on February 1, 2026. However, there was no documentation provided at the time of the inspection showing E2 was rehired as manager or documentation of a temporary manager for the month of January 2026.  6. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided.

R9-10-808.A.3A.A.C. § RR9-10-808.A.3
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-808.A.3

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident’s service plan included the amount, type, and frequency of assisted living services and ancillary services being provided to the resident, for two of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the residents’ needs were not being met. Findings include: 1. A review of R1’s medical record revealed a service plan dated December 8, 2025. The service plan revealed R1 received personal care services. However, the service plan did not specify the frequency R1 received the following services:  a. “Partial bath: At Bedside”; b. “Dressing: Assist in selecting clothes, assist in putting on shoes, assist in removing clothes”; c. “Maintenance of Room: Dependent”; and d. “Laundry Services: Dependent”. 2. A review of R2’s medical record revealed a service plan dated January 21, 2026. The service plan revealed R2 received personal care services. However, the service plan did not specify the frequency R2 received the following services:  a. “Oral care: Brush teeth”; b. “Dressing: Assist in putting on shoes, assist in removing clothes”; c. “Maintenance of Room: Dependent”; and d. “Laundry Services: Dependent”. 3. In the exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided.

R9-10-811.C.3A.A.C. § RR9-10-811.C.3
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-811.C.3

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident’s medical record contained the name and contact information of the resident’s representative and the document signed by the resident consenting for the resident’s representative to act on the resident’s behalf, or if the resident’s representative has a health care power of attorney, a copy of the health care power of attorney, for one of two residents sampled.  Findings include: 1. A review of R2’s medical record revealed a service plan dated January 21, 2026. The service plan was signed by R2’s representative.  2. Further review of R2’s medical record revealed the record did not contain a document signed by R2 consenting for R2’s representative to act on R2’s behalf, or a copy of a R2’s representative’s healthcare power of attorney.   3. In an interview, E1 reported R2’s representative had a power of attorney to act on R2’s behalf, however, no power of attorney documentation for R2 was provided during the inspection. 4. In the exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided.

R9-10-817.A.2A.A.C. § RR9-10-817.A.2
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-817.A.2

Based on record review, document review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a written order verifying a verbal order was obtained from a medical practitioner within 14 calendar days after receiving the verbal order, for two of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk to the resident’s health and safety. Findings include: 1. A review of R1’s current service plan, dated December 8, 2025, revealed R1 received medication administration.  2. A review of R1’s medical record revealed a Patient Medication Record dated December 24, 2025. The record contained a digital signature by a registered nurse (RN). However, there were no signed orders from a medical practitioner verifying the verbal orders in R1’s medical records. The record contained the following medications: a. Lantus SoloStar Subcutaneous Solution Pen-Injector 100 Unit/ML, inject 25 units subcutaneously at bedtime;  b. Metoprolol Succinate ER Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 25 MG, 1 tab by mouth daily; c. Furosemide Oral Tablet 40 MG, 1 tab by mouth every morning;  d. Doxazosin Mesylate Oral Tablet 2 MG, 1 tab by mouth every morning; e. Hydralazine HCl Oral Tablet 100 MG, 1 tab by mouth every 8 hours; and f. Lorazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 MG, take 0.5mg by mouth twice daily. 3. A review of R1’s medical record revealed a medication administration record (MAR) dated January 2026 and February 2026. The MAR revealed R1 received the following medications on the following dates and times: a. Lorazepam 0.5 MG Take 1 Tab PO BID: 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM January 1, 2026 – February 5, 2026; b. Metoprolol Succinate 25 MG Give 1 Tab PO QD: 8:00 AM January 1, 2026 – February 5, 2026; c. Furosemide (Lasix) 40 MG Give 1 Tab PO Q AM: 8:00 AM January 1, 2026 – February 5, 2026; d. Doxazosin Mesylate 2 MG Give 1 Tab PO Q AM: 8:00 AM January 1, 2026 – February 5, 2026; e. Lantus Pen Inj 100 U/ML Inject 20 units intramuscularly: 8:00 PM January 1, 2026 – February 5, 2026; and f. Amiodarone 200 MG Give 1 Tab PO BID: 8:00 AM January 1, 2026 – February 5, 2026. 4. A review of R2’s current service plan, dated January 21, 2026, revealed R2 received medication administration.  5. A review of R2’s medical record revealed a verbal medication list dated October 10, 2025. The list was E-signed by a registered nurse (RN). However, there were no signed orders from a medical practitioner verifying the verbal orders in R2’s medical records. The list contained the following medications: a. Fluoxetine HCI Tablet 20 MG – Administer 1 Tablet Oral once daily (qd); b. Furosemide Tablet 20 MG – Administer 1 Tablet Oral qd c. Gabapentin Capsule 300 MG – Administer 1 Capsule Oral qd; d. Metoprolol Succinate ER Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 25 MG – Administer 0.5 Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour Oral qd; e. Montelukast Sodium Tablet 10MG - Administer 1 Tablet Oral qd; f. Potassium Chloride ER Tablet Extended Release 10 MEQ - Administer 1 Tablet Extended Release Oral twice daily (bid); g. Tamsulosin HCI Capsule 0.4MG - Administer 1 Capsule Oral qd; h. Verapamil HCI Tablet 80MG - Administer 1 Tablet Oral bid; and i. Trazodone HCI Tablet 50 MG - Administer 1 Tablet Oral at bedtime (qhs). 6. A review of R2’s medical record revealed a medication administration record (MAR) dated January 2026 and February 2026. The MAR revealed R2 received the following medications on the following dates: a. Fluoxetine HCL CAP 20 MG, Give 1 cap PO Once Daily: 8:00 AM January 22, 2026 - February 1, 2026; b. Furosemide 20MG Tab Give 1 Tab PO Once Daily: 8:00 AM January 22, 2026 - February 1, 2026; c. Gabapentin 300 MG Cap Give 1 Cap PO Once Daily: 8:00 AM January 22, 2026 - February 1, 2026; d. Lorazepam 1 MG Tab Give 1 Tab PO Every 8 Hrs: 12:00 AM and 8:00 AM on February 1-3, 2026, and 4:00 PM February 1-2, 2026; e. Metoprolol 25 MG Tab Give 0.5 Tab PO Daily: 8:00 AM January 22, 2026 - February 3, 2026; f. Montelukast 10MG Give 1 Tab PO Once Daily: 8:00 AM January 22, 2026 - February 3, 2026; g. Potassium Chloride 10 MEQ Give 1 Tab PO BID: 8:00 AM January 22, 2026 - February 3, 2026, and 5:00 PM February 1-2, 2026; h. Sennoside Docusate 8.6-50MG Give 1 Tab PO at Bed Time: 7:00 PM February 1, 2026; i. Tamsulosin 0.4MG Give 1 Cap PO Once Daily: 7:00 PM January 21-31, 2026; j. Verapamil HCL 80MG Give 1 Tab PO BID: 8:00 AM January 22-31, 2026, and 5:00 PM January 21-31, 2026; and k. Trazodone 50 MG Tab Give 1 Tab PO at Bed Time: 7:00 PM January 21-31, 2026. 7. A review of the facility’s policies and procedures revealed a policy titled, “Medication Services” which stated the following: a. “e. The manager will obtain the physician signature on the ‘Admission Order Form’ (by fax or mail) within 14 days.”  b. “h. The signed copy of the ‘Admission Order Form’ will be placed in the resident record, replacing the unsigned copy,”  c. “l. The manager will obtain the physician signature (by mail or fax) on the ‘Verbal Order Form’ to substantiate the verbal orders within 14 days.”  8. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R1’s and R2’s signed medication orders were not available in R1’s and R2’s medical records. E1 did not provide signed medical orders for R1 or R2 at the time of inspection. 9. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided.

2025-01-27
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
2024-10-21
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.