Arizona · Chandler

Sunrise of Chandler.

Care Facility100 bedsDementia-trained staff(480) 786-4998
Peer rank
Top 17% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Chandler
A 100-bed Care Facility with 3 citations on file.
Licensed beds
100
Last inspection
Sep 2025
Last citation
Sep 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A large home, reviewed on public record.

Sunrise of Chandler

© Google Street View

Map showing location of Sunrise of Chandler
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 75 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
74th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
76th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: SEP 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
SEP 2025
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

3 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D3
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

5 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

5
reports on file
3
total deficiencies
2026-07-07
Complaint Investigation
No findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for Sunrise of Chandler, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

2026-05-06
Complaint Investigation
No findings
2026-04-08
Complaint Investigation
No findings
2026-01-29
Complaint Investigation
No findings
2025-09-23
Annual Compliance Visit
R9-10-113.A · 3 findings
R9-10-113.AA.A.C. § RR9-10-113.A
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-113.A

Based on documentation review and interview, the health care institution failed to establish, document, and implement tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities, including annually assessing the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious TB. The deficient practice posed a TB exposure risk to residents and staff. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility’s documentation revealed an incomplete annual assessment of the facility's TB risk assessment for 2024, with no signatures.  No other current documentation of an annual assessment was available. 2. In an interview, E9 acknowledged that an assessment of the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious TB was not conducted. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E8 and E9, and no additional information was provided.

R9-10-807.AA.A.C. § RR9-10-807.A
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-807.A

Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident provided documentation of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113, for eight of eight residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a high potential health and safety risk to residents and staff of TB exposure. Findings include: 1. R9-10-113.A states "If a health care institution is subject to the requirements of this Section, as specified in an Article in this Chapter, the health care institution's chief administrative officer shall ensure that the health care institution establishes, documents, and implements tuberculosis infection control activities that...2. Include: a. For each individual who is employed by the health care institution, provides volunteer services for the health care institution, or is admitted to the health care institution and who is subject to the requirements of this Section, screening, on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter, that consists of: i. Assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious tuberculosis, ii. Determining if the individual has signs or symptoms of tuberculosis, and iii. Obtaining documentation of the individual's freedom from infectious tuberculosis according to subsection (B)(1)..." 2. A review of R1's, R2’s, R3’s, R4’s, R5’s, R6’s, R7’s, and R8’s medical records revealed no documentation of an assessment of the residents' risk of exposure to infectious TB. Based on the acceptance dates, this documentation was required.   3. A review of the facility's policies and procedures revealed a policy titled “TB Screening.” The policy stated, “ For states/provinces requiring TB screening/testing, requirements may include: Risk evaluation, symptom screening, and IGRA blood test.” 4. In an interview, E9 acknowledged that an assessment of the resident’s risk of exposure to infectious TB was not conducted. 5. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E8 and E9, and no additional information was provided.

R9-10-817.B.3.bA.A.C. § RR9-10-817.B.3.b
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-817.B.3.b

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medication was administered in compliance with a medication order for one of eight residents reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk if the resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication. Findings include: 1. A review of R3's medical record revealed a current written service plan dated September 3, 2025. This service plan indicated R3 received medication administration.   2. A review of R3's medical record revealed signed medication orders dated June 9, 2025. The medication order stated “Propranolol HCl Oral Tablet 20 mg. Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to Essential Hypertension. Hold for SBP less than 100 or HR less than 60.”  3. A review of R3's medical record revealed a September 2025 medication administration record (MAR). This MAR stated “Propranolol HCl Oral Tablet 20 mg. Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to Essential Hypertension. Hold for SBP less than 100 or HR less than 60.” “Propranolol” was administered on the following dates:  September 2, 2025, between 1900-2100 with R3’s heart rate (HR) at 56  September 15, 2025 between 0700 - 0900 with R3’s HR at 58 September 21, 2025 between 0700 - 0900 with R3’s HR at 57 September 22, 2025 between 0700 - 0900 with R3’s HR at 47 4. In an interview, E8 acknowledged that “Propranolol” was supposed to be held on those dates.  5. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E8 and E9, and no additional information was provided.

1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.

Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.