Amazing Comfort Homes.

A small home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
5 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
5 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2024-05-14Annual Compliance VisitA.A.C. · 5 findings
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that one of three employees were in compliance with A.R.S. \'a7 36-411. The deficient practice posed a risk if E3 was a danger to a vulnerable population. Findings include: 1. Review of E3's record revealed a hire date of May 11, 2023. 2. Review of E3's record revealed a fingerprint card with an expiration date of May 4, 2024. 3. Review of the DPS fingerprint clearance card database revealed E3's fingerprint clearance card expired and a new card application was not in process. 4. Review of the current personnel schedule revealed E3 worked the PM shift May 10th after the fingerprint card expired. 5. During an interview, E1 reported E3 worked as a caregiver in the facility and acknowledged E3's fingerprint clearance card expired.”
“Based on record review, documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that assistance was provided for one of two residents in accordance with their service plans. The deficient practice posed a risk if residents were not receiving services according to their service plans. Findings include: 1. A record revealed that R2 had a service plan dated April 19, 2024. The service plan indicated that R2 was unable to turn in bed. 2. A record revealed that R2's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) required "Night check monitoring 3X at night and PRN". There was a subsection to this section titled "Turn Side by Side Q3hrs". None of these were marked as completed for the month of May. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that R2 had not been turned at night in accordance with R2's service plan.”
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure a means of exiting the facility that controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed potential physical dangers to residents. Findings include: 1. The Compliance Officer observed an unlocked and unalarmed sliding door to the back of the facility which led directly to the backyard. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that the sliding door to the back yard of the facility was unlocked and unalarmed.”
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that poisonous and toxic materials were maintained in a locked area and inaccessible to residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of residents. Findings include: 1. The Compliance Officer observed an unlocked and unsecured door that led into a laundry room with the following chemicals: - Shout Triple-Action Stain Remover - Window Clean glass cleaner - Bright Green Furniture Polish - Scrubbing Bubbles Mega Shower Foam - Top Job Lemon Bleach 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that the laundry room was unlocked, unsecured and that residents had access to the chemicals.”
“Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that flammable liquids and hazardous materials were stored in a locked area inaccessible to residents. The deficient practice posed potential physical dangers to residents. Findings include: 1. The Compliance Officer observed an unlocked and unalarmed sliding door to the back of the facility which led directly to the backyard. 2. The Compliance Officer observed an unlocked shed in the backyard which contained an unsecured propane tank. 3. The Compliance Officer observed an additional unsecured propane tank to the north side of the facility. 4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that the sliding door to the back of the facility was unlocked and unalarmed. E1 also acknowledged that this gave residents access to the two unsecured propane tanks.”
Other facilities in Chandler.
Other memory care facilities near Chandler with similar care offerings.
Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience



