Arizona · Chandler

New Horizon Assisted Living.

Care Facility5 bedsDementia-trained staff(480) 590-5182
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 36% of Arizona memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Chandler
A 5-bed Care Facility with 3 citations on file.
Licensed beds
5
Last inspection
Jul 2025
Last citation
Jul 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A small home, reviewed on public record.

New Horizon Assisted Living

© Google Street View

Map showing location of New Horizon Assisted Living
© Mapbox · OpenStreetMap
Peer Comparison

Compared to 1,649 Arizona facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Arizona Dept. of Health Services · Bureau of Residential Facilities Licensing.

Severity rank
43rd%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
50th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month ADHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: JUL 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
JUL 2025
Sep 2024as of Aug 2026

Finding distribution

3 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D3
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.

1
reports on file
3
total deficiencies
2025-07-10
Annual Compliance Visit
R9-10-803.C.3 · 3 findings

Facility Watch · Premium

Monitor this facility.

We'll notify you if anything changes.

Official inspection and license-record changes for New Horizon Assisted Living, plus news, public reviews, and complaint mentions across the web — usually within a day of appearing online. Nothing is swept under the rug.

  • Official inspection and license-record alerts (included)
  • Broader web mentions: news, enforcement, lawsuits, closures
  • Public review and complaint mentions online
  • Source-linked alerts, usually within a day

$9/month or $59/year · Cancel anytime

Payment is processed by Stripe. Monitoring is activated within one business day. Web and review mentions are best-effort from what we can find publicly. Cancel anytime from your billing link.

R9-10-803.C.3A.A.C. § RR9-10-803.C.3
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-803.C.3

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that policies and procedures were reviewed at least once every three years and updated as needed. The deficient practice posed a risk as policies and procedures reinforce and clarify standards expected of employees. Findings include:  1. A review of the facility's policy and procedure manual revealed an update date of April 22, 2022.  2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that the policies and procedures were not reviewed at least once every three years and updated as needed.

R9-10-806.A.8A.A.C. § RR9-10-806.A.8
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-806.A.8

Based on documentation review, observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113, for one of two personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings include: 1. R9-10-113.A states, "If a health care institution is subject to the requirements of this Section, as specified in an Article in this Chapter, the health care institution's chief administrative officer shall ensure that the health care institution establishes, documents, and implements tuberculosis infection control activities that...2. Include: a. For each individual who is employed by the health care institution, provides volunteer services for the health care institution, or is admitted to the health care institution and who is subject to the requirements of this Section, screening, on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter, that consists of: i. Assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious tuberculosis, ii. Determining if the individual has signs or symptoms of tuberculosis, and iii. Obtaining documentation of the individual's freedom from infectious tuberculosis according to subsection (B)(1)..." 2. A review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website revealed a web page titled, "Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Health-Care Settings, 2005." The web page stated, "If TST (Mantoux Skin Test) is used for baseline testing, two-step testing is recommended for HCWs (Health Care Workers) whose initial TST results are negative. If the first-step TST result is negative, the second-step TST should be administered 1-3 weeks after the first TST result was read." 3. While on-site for the compliance inspection, the Compliance Officer observed E3 at the facility, providing services to residents.  4. A review of E3's personnel record revealed a negative TB skin test that was less than 12 months old; however, no additional documentation of freedom from infectious TB was available for review. Based on E3’s date of hire, this documentation was required. 5. In an interview, E1 acknowledged E3 did not provide evidence of freedom from infectious TB as specified in R9-10-113.

R9-10-819.A.2A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.2
Verbatim citation text · A.A.C. § RR9-10-819.A.2

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the facility's disaster plan was reviewed at least once every 12 months. The deficient practice posed a risk as a disaster plan reinforces and clarifies standards expected of employees. Findings include:  1. A review of the facility's policies and procedures revealed that the facility's disaster plan was reviewed on May 5, 2024. However, no documentation of an additional review was available. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged that the facility's disaster plan was not reviewed at least once every 12 months.

1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.

Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.