Blossom Creek Senior Alzheimer Community.
Blossom Creek Senior Alzheimer Community is Ranked in the top 49% of Washington memory care with 5 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Oct 2025.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
© Google Street View
Compared to 38 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Blossom Creek Senior Alzheimer Community has 5 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
5 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
5 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Blossom Creek Senior Alzheimer Community's record and state requirements.
The most recent inspection on October 1, 2025 identified 2 deficiencies — can you walk me through what those deficiencies were, and show me the written corrective action plans the facility submitted to DSHS Residential Care Services?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
This community holds a DSHS Specialized Dementia Care contract — can you provide the written dementia care program that describes how staff are trained to support residents with memory impairment, and confirm that program meets the contract requirements?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
One complaint was filed with DSHS during the inspection period on file — was that complaint substantiated, and if so, what specific changes did the facility make in response?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-10-01Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2025-03-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 5 findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation at Blossom Creek Senior Alzheimer Community from November 2024 through January 2025 found that the facility failed to provide care and services according to residents' negotiated service agreements for three of four residents sampled, placing them at risk for an undignified experience and potential health problems. The investigation identified deficiencies related to the implementation of negotiated service agreements and consultation requirements, and citations were written. The facility's internal investigation had not substantiated neglect, but the state investigator found that cares and services were not being provided as required.
“The facility failed to ensure that cares and services were implemented according to negotiated service agreements for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 1, 2, and 4), resulting in residents not receiving required personal care, hygiene, and other services.”
“The facility failed to conduct focused assessments following residents' falls with injuries, as required by regulation.”
“The facility failed to complete required documentation and assessment procedures related to fall incidents and resident injuries.”
“The facility did not properly identify and document changes in resident physical functioning related to fall incidents.”
“The facility failed to implement appropriate interventions following identified changes in resident conditions related to falls.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2160: The facility failed to ensure that cares and services were implemented according to negotiated service agreements for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 1, 2, and 4), resulting in residents not receiving required personal care, hygiene, and other services. WAC 388-78A-2100-2-b: The facility failed to conduct focused assessments following residents' falls with injuries, as required by regulation. WAC 388-78A-2100-2-b-i: The facility failed to complete required documentation and assessment procedures related to fall incidents and resident injuries. WAC 388-78A-2100-2-b-ii: The facility did not properly identify and document changes in resident physical functioning related to fall incidents. WAC 388-78A-2100-2-b-iii: The facility failed to implement appropriate interventions following identified changes in resident conditions related to falls.
Free · Facility Watch
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience