Bonaventure of Puyallup.
Bonaventure of Puyallup is Ranked in the bottom 1% on citation severity among Washington peers with 9 DSHS citations on record; last inspected May 2025.

A large home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 22 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Bonaventure of Puyallup has 9 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
9 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
9 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
5 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-05-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted in May 2025. The outcome field indicates no determination was recorded in the available documentation. Families seeking details on this facility's compliance should contact Washington DSHS directly for the complete investigation findings.
“The facility failed to implement policies and procedures to supervise and monitor residents, including accounting for residents who leave the premises. A resident (R1) was not checked on timely and died without staff knowing his whereabouts, despite family members calling multiple times to request welfare checks.”
“The facility failed to notify representatives of the passing of 2 of 2 sample residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2), resulting in emotional distress and complicating the grieving process.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2600(2)(i): The facility failed to implement policies and procedures to supervise and monitor residents, including accounting for residents who leave the premises. A resident (R1) was not checked on timely and died without staff knowing his whereabouts, despite family members calling multiple times to request welfare checks. WAC 388-78A-2640(1)(c): The facility failed to notify representatives of the passing of 2 of 2 sample residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2), resulting in emotional distress and complicating the grieving process.
2025-01-01Complaint InvestigationType B · 1 finding
“The facility failed to provide written discharge notice to a resident who was discharged after hospitalization. The notice was required to include the reason for discharge, effective date, location of transfer, and ombudsman contact information.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
RCW 70.129.110: The facility failed to provide written discharge notice to a resident who was discharged after hospitalization. The notice was required to include the reason for discharge, effective date, location of transfer, and ombudsman contact information.
2024-07-01Complaint InvestigationIJ · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted at this facility in July 2024, but the outcome is not documented in the available records. Families seeking details about what was investigated or what findings resulted should contact Washington DSHS directly for the complete report.
“The facility failed to coordinate care with external health care providers and respond timely and appropriately during a medical emergency for Resident 1. Facility staff hesitated to intervene when instructed by 911 operator to move the resident from a bedside commode and position them for CPR, resulting in a delay in care and a less than pleasant death with dignity.”
“The facility failed to provide care and services to Resident 1 as stated in the Negotiated Service Agreement related to toileting the resident.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2350: The facility failed to coordinate care with external health care providers and respond timely and appropriately during a medical emergency for Resident 1. Facility staff hesitated to intervene when instructed by 911 operator to move the resident from a bedside commode and position them for CPR, resulting in a delay in care and a less than pleasant death with dignity. —: The facility failed to provide care and services to Resident 1 as stated in the Negotiated Service Agreement related to toileting the resident.
2024-05-01Annual Compliance Visit3 findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection was conducted in May 2024 with no complaints or investigations documented in this report. The facility met standards during the inspection period. No violations or deficiencies were cited.
“The facility failed to ensure 6 of 9 sampled residents' pets had regular veterinary examinations and immunizations by a licensed Washington veterinarian. Four residents had no documentation of their pets on file, and two residents had pets with expired rabies vaccinations (expired 08/13/2016 and 05/09/2022). This placed all residents at risk of diseases transmittable by animals to humans.”
“The facility failed to ensure 3 of 6 sampled staff (Staff B, C, and F) had an initial tuberculosis skin test within three days of employment and a second skin test one to three weeks after the first. Staff B's first test was over one month late with no second test; Staff C's first test was over 10 months late with no second test; Staff F's first test was over 2 years and 10 months late with no second test. This placed all residents at risk of TB infection.”
“The facility failed to ensure a department national fingerprint background check was completed for 4 of 6 sampled staff (Staff C, D, E, and F) who were hired after January 7, 2012. While initial name and date of birth checks were completed, no final fingerprint background check results were on file. This placed residents at risk of care from staff with potential disqualifying crimes.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2620: The facility failed to ensure 6 of 9 sampled residents' pets had regular veterinary examinations and immunizations by a licensed Washington veterinarian. Four residents had no documentation of their pets on file, and two residents had pets with expired rabies vaccinations (expired 08/13/2016 and 05/09/2022). This placed all residents at risk of diseases transmittable by animals to humans. WAC 388-78A-2484: The facility failed to ensure 3 of 6 sampled staff (Staff B, C, and F) had an initial tuberculosis skin test within three days of employment and a second skin test one to three weeks after the first. Staff B's first test was over one month late with no second test; Staff C's first test was over 10 months late with no second test; Staff F's first test was over 2 years and 10 months late with no second test. This placed all residents at risk of TB infection. WAC 388-78A-24642: The facility failed to ensure a department national fingerprint background check was completed for 4 of 6 sampled staff (Staff C, D, E, and F) who were hired after January 7, 2012. While initial name and date of birth checks were completed, no final fingerprint background check results were on file. This placed residents at risk of care from staff with potential disqualifying crimes.
2023-10-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
“The facility failed to cooperate with the department by not providing requested resident and staff records during an investigation. Despite multiple follow-up requests via email and in-person interviews, records for residents 3 and 4 and most staff documents were never provided, hindering the department's ability to conduct a thorough and timely investigation.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-3140: The facility failed to cooperate with the department by not providing requested resident and staff records during an investigation. Despite multiple follow-up requests via email and in-person interviews, records for residents 3 and 4 and most staff documents were never provided, hindering the department's ability to conduct a thorough and timely investigation.
Other facilities in South Hill.
Other memory care facilities near South Hill with similar care offerings.
Free · Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience