The Hampton at Salmon Creek Memory Care Community.
The Hampton at Salmon Creek Memory Care Community is Ranked in the top 13% of Washington memory care with 1 DSHS citation on record; last inspected Mar 2024.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
© Google Street View
Compared to 43 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
The Hampton at Salmon Creek Memory Care Community has 1 citation on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
1 deficiency on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
1 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to The Hampton at Salmon Creek Memory Care Community's record and state requirements.
The facility holds a DSHS Specialized Dementia Care contract — can you walk us through the specific dementia-care training requirements that contract mandates for staff, and show us documentation of how often those trainings are completed?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The March 2024 inspection identified 2 deficiencies — what were the subjects of those deficiencies, and can you provide the written corrective action plans the facility submitted to DSHS to resolve them?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
With 68 licensed beds designated for memory care, how does the facility organize residents by stage of dementia progression, and what written policies guide decisions about when a resident may need a higher level of care?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
1 inspection in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2024-03-01Annual Compliance VisitType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During a routine inspection on January 5, 2024, Washington DSHS found that the facility failed to report a COVID-19 outbreak to the local health jurisdiction as required; the facility did not call to report the outbreak until the health department called them on December 12, 2023, after learning of a COVID-19 related death at the facility from a hospital. The inspection documented that beginning November 28, 2023, residents developed symptoms, and by early December 2023, 30 residents had tested positive, but the facility only confirmed the outbreak when contacted by health authorities rather than initiating the required report. A deficiency was cited for violation of infection control reporting requirements, and the facility was directed to submit a plan of correction within 45 days.
“The facility failed to report a suspected COVID-19 outbreak to the local Health jurisdiction as required. An outbreak was suspected on 12/02/2023 when the first resident tested positive, with 25 additional residents testing positive by 12/04/2023, but the facility did not contact the local health jurisdiction until 12/12/2023 when LHJ initiated contact regarding a COVID-19 related death.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2610: The facility failed to report a suspected COVID-19 outbreak to the local Health jurisdiction as required. An outbreak was suspected on 12/02/2023 when the first resident tested positive, with 25 additional residents testing positive by 12/04/2023, but the facility did not contact the local health jurisdiction until 12/12/2023 when LHJ initiated contact regarding a COVID-19 related death. WAC 388-78A-2610: The facility failed to provide fit testing documentation for N-95 masks per infection control requirements.
Free · Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience