San Juan Villa.
San Juan Villa is Ranked in the top 32% of Washington memory care with 3 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Mar 2026.
A medium home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 38 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
San Juan Villa has 3 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
3 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to San Juan Villa's record and state requirements.
San Juan Villa holds a DSHS Specialized Dementia Care contract — can you walk us through the written dementia care program that contract requires, and show us how staff document daily observations and behavioral interventions for memory care residents?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
DSHS records show 3 deficiencies across 3 inspection reports, with the most recent inspection on March 1, 2025 — can you share the corrective action plans submitted to DSHS for those deficiencies and explain what changes were implemented?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Two complaints were filed with DSHS Residential Care Services during the inspection period on file — can you describe the nature of those complaints and any remediation steps the facility took in response?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-03-01Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2025-03-01Annual Compliance Visit2 findings
Plain-language summary
During a routine inspection on January 23, 2025, a deficiency was cited because the facility failed to notify the physician when one resident refused medications, which placed the resident at risk since the doctor could not evaluate the medical significance of the refusal or provide instructions. The resident in question refused to wear prescribed oxygen, and despite the facility's written policy and staff training requiring physician notification for every medication refusal, the facility could not provide documentation showing the physician had been notified of these refusals. The facility's plan of correction was to retrain all medication aides to fax the physician each time a resident refuses medication.
“The facility failed to ensure water temperature was maintained between 105°F and 120°F in 6 of 6 resident accessible sinks and 4 of 4 sampled sinks inside resident rooms. This failure placed 32 residents and 30 staff at risk for potential skin burns.”
“The facility failed to notify the physician when a sampled resident refused medications on two occasions (01/11/2025 and 01/18/2025). The facility lacked documentation showing the physician had been notified of the medication refusals, placing the resident at risk for medical complications.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2230: The facility failed to notify the physician when a sampled resident refused medications on two occasions (01/11/2025 and 01/18/2025). The facility lacked documentation showing the physician had been notified of the medication refusals, placing the resident at risk for medical complications. WAC 388-78A-2950: The facility failed to ensure water temperature was maintained between 105°F and 120°F in 6 of 6 resident accessible sinks and 4 of 4 sampled sinks inside resident rooms. This failure placed 32 residents and 30 staff at risk for potential skin burns.
2024-01-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
“The assisted living facility failed to ensure staff members followed infection control practice standards and Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) protocols prior to exiting residents' rooms during a viral infection outbreak.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: The assisted living facility failed to ensure staff members followed infection control practice standards and Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) protocols prior to exiting residents' rooms during a viral infection outbreak.
Free · Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience