Canterbury Gardens.

A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 43 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
1 deficiency on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
1 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Canterbury Gardens's record and state requirements.
Canterbury Gardens holds a DSHS Specialized Dementia Care contract — can you provide a copy of the written dementia care program that satisfies that contract, and explain how staff training requirements differ from standard assisted living?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
DSHS records show 4 total deficiencies across 4 inspection reports, with the most recent inspection on July 1, 2025 — can you share the corrective action plans submitted to DSHS for those deficiencies and confirm which have been verified as resolved?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Two complaints were filed with DSHS during the inspection period on file — were either of those complaints substantiated, and what documentation can you provide showing how the facility addressed any substantiated findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2026-01-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
“The facility failed to provide a resident with the appropriate transfer needs identified in their Negotiated Service Agreement, resulting in a fall with injury.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: The facility failed to provide a resident with the appropriate transfer needs identified in their Negotiated Service Agreement, resulting in a fall with injury.
2025-07-01Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-05-01Complaint InvestigationNo findings
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience