Bonaventure of East Wenatchee.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 24 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
on file.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
12 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
12 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
8 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2026-01-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 2 findings
“The facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the Department's Complaint Resolution Unit immediately for one resident. Staff member received abuse allegations on 07/17/2025 but the accused staff member was allowed to continue providing care on 07/18/2025 before termination.”
“The facility failed to update the resident's service agreement and care plan to address the resident's preference for wearing a wig and how to care for it, as well as the resident's hallucinations and delusions after moving to memory care unit.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2630: The facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the Department's Complaint Resolution Unit immediately for one resident. Staff member received abuse allegations on 07/17/2025 but the accused staff member was allowed to continue providing care on 07/18/2025 before termination. WAC 388-78A-2130: The facility failed to update the resident's service agreement and care plan to address the resident's preference for wearing a wig and how to care for it, as well as the resident's hallucinations and delusions after moving to memory care unit.
2025-12-01Complaint Investigation3 findings
“Facility staff failed to update residents' care plans to reflect identified behaviors related to resident-to-resident interactions.”
“Facility staff did not have current long-term care worker certification and were working on the floor as untrained caregivers.”
“Staff did not have readily available key access to a resident's apartment door after the resident fell with injury, delaying emergency response.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2140: Facility staff failed to update residents' care plans to reflect identified behaviors related to resident-to-resident interactions. WAC 388-78A-2450: Facility staff did not have current long-term care worker certification and were working on the floor as untrained caregivers. WAC 388-78A-2703: Staff did not have readily available key access to a resident's apartment door after the resident fell with injury, delaying emergency response.
2025-08-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 2 findings
“The facility failed to put interventions in place to prevent recurrence of a named resident leaving the facility unaccompanied. The resident eloped on three occasions (03/19/2025, 03/20/2025, and 04/10/2025) without any documented preventive measures being implemented after the first incident.”
“The facility failed to develop, implement, and train staff on policies and procedures to supervise and monitor residents, including accounting for residents who leave the premises. The facility had no documented elopement policy, staff were not trained on elopement response procedures, and there was no way to identify elopement risks.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2371: The facility failed to put interventions in place to prevent recurrence of a named resident leaving the facility unaccompanied. The resident eloped on three occasions (03/19/2025, 03/20/2025, and 04/10/2025) without any documented preventive measures being implemented after the first incident. WAC 388-78A-2600: The facility failed to develop, implement, and train staff on policies and procedures to supervise and monitor residents, including accounting for residents who leave the premises. The facility had no documented elopement policy, staff were not trained on elopement response procedures, and there was no way to identify elopement risks.
2025-04-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
“The facility failed their Life and Safety reinspection by the Deputy State Fire Marshal.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2040: The facility failed their Life and Safety reinspection by the Deputy State Fire Marshal.
2025-02-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
“The assisted living facility failed to maintain the kitchen and food storage areas in a clean and sanitary condition. Observations documented multiple areas of unsanitary conditions including mold/discoloration, hard water stains, dried food particles, brown staining, and musty odors throughout the kitchen and food storage areas, which placed residents at risk for food safety concerns.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-3090: The assisted living facility failed to maintain the kitchen and food storage areas in a clean and sanitary condition. Observations documented multiple areas of unsanitary conditions including mold/discoloration, hard water stains, dried food particles, brown staining, and musty odors throughout the kitchen and food storage areas, which placed residents at risk for food safety concerns.
2024-06-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
“The facility failed their follow-up visit for their Life and Safety inspection by the Deputy State Fire Marshal on 04/09/2024.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2040: The facility failed their follow-up visit for their Life and Safety inspection by the Deputy State Fire Marshal on 04/09/2024.
2024-04-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
“The facility failed to implement CPR policy when a resident was found unresponsive. Staff did not initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation despite the resident being unresponsive.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2600(2)(d): The facility failed to implement CPR policy when a resident was found unresponsive. Staff did not initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation despite the resident being unresponsive.
2024-03-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
“The named resident did not receive care and services as outlined in their Negotiated Service Agreement (NSA). A resident was not being changed as needed, constituting neglect.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2160: The named resident did not receive care and services as outlined in their Negotiated Service Agreement (NSA). A resident was not being changed as needed, constituting neglect.
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Facility Watch · Premium
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience