Rosario Assisted Living.
Rosario Assisted Living is Ranked in the top 36% of Washington memory care with 6 DSHS citations on record; last inspected Jun 2025.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 43 Washington facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Washington DSHS · Aging and Disability Services Administration.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DSHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Rosario Assisted Living has 6 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
6 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
6 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Rosario Assisted Living's record and state requirements.
The most recent inspection on October 1, 2023 identified 4 deficiencies — can you walk us through the corrective action plan the facility submitted to DSHS and show us documentation that those deficiencies have been resolved?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Three complaints were filed with DSHS during the inspection period on file — were any of those complaints substantiated, and what changes did the facility make in response to the findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
This community holds a DSHS Specialized Dementia Care contract — can you provide a copy of the written dementia care program and explain how staff competency in dementia care is assessed and documented?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-06-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation at Rosario Assisted Living in April 2025 found that the facility failed to complete an adequate skin assessment for one resident upon admission, which resulted in multiple skin wounds going undetected and untreated until the resident was hospitalized with sepsis. The facility's pre-admission assessment documented no visual skin examination despite the resident's need for assistance with toileting and personal care, and subsequent wound care issues and signs of infection were not properly reported to the resident's physician. A deficiency was cited for failure to conduct ongoing assessments as required under Washington licensing regulations.
“The facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate assessment was completed for a resident with skin wounds. The resident was admitted with a deep pressure ulcer on the coccyx and bruising/swelling of the peri-area that were not identified during the pre-admission assessment, resulting in the resident being hospitalized with sepsis.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2100: The facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate assessment was completed for a resident with skin wounds. The resident was admitted with a deep pressure ulcer on the coccyx and bruising/swelling of the peri-area that were not identified during the pre-admission assessment, resulting in the resident being hospitalized with sepsis.
2025-05-01Complaint InvestigationType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
On March 12, 2025, a complaint investigation at Rosario Assisted Living's two memory care cottages found that no group activities had been provided for two months, with residents observed sitting or napping with no activity items available, after the facility's activity director left in February 2025. Staff confirmed families were unhappy about the lack of group activities and that caregivers were attempting only individual activities when time permitted. The facility was cited for failing to meet the licensing requirement to provide group activities at least three times per week.
“The assisted living facility failed to provide group activities for residents in two memory care cottages (Adam and Baker) for two months, with no activity director on staff since 02/10/2025. Observations showed residents inactive with no activities or activity items visible, and staff confirmed no group activities had occurred for two months.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2180: The assisted living facility failed to provide group activities for residents in two memory care cottages (Adam and Baker) for two months, with no activity director on staff since 02/10/2025. Observations showed residents inactive with no activities or activity items visible, and staff confirmed no group activities had occurred for two months.
2023-11-01Complaint Investigation1 finding
Plain-language summary
I don't have enough information in the provided text to write a meaningful summary. The document shows this was a complaint investigation, but the narrative section and conclusion are blank or unclear—there's no description of what the complaint alleged, what was inspected, or what was found. To give families accurate information, I would need details about the complaint subject matter and the actual inspection findings or conclusions.
“The assisted living facility failed to ensure their resident-to-staff communication system performed reliably throughout the facility. Sampled residents in Erie Building were unable to place calls to staff through the pendant/pager system used to alert staff of assistance needs.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
WAC 388-78A-2930: The assisted living facility failed to ensure their resident-to-staff communication system performed reliably throughout the facility. Sampled residents in Erie Building were unable to place calls to staff through the pendant/pager system used to alert staff of assistance needs.
2023-10-01Annual Compliance Visit3 findings
“The Assisted Living Facility failed to respond to a named resident's call light while the resident was in the shower, creating a safety concern.”
“The named resident's Negotiated Service Agreement was not updated to meet the resident's current level of care following multiple falls in the facility.”
“The named resident's call pendant was not working when activated and was found on the nightstand instead of being properly maintained.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
—: The Assisted Living Facility failed to respond to a named resident's call light while the resident was in the shower, creating a safety concern. —: The named resident's Negotiated Service Agreement was not updated to meet the resident's current level of care following multiple falls in the facility. —: The named resident's call pendant was not working when activated and was found on the nightstand instead of being properly maintained.
Other facilities in Skagit County.
Other memory care facilities in Skagit County with similar care offerings.
Free · Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.