Lotus Park Care Centers.
Lotus Park Care Centers is Ranked in the top 34% of Utah memory care with 4 DLBC citations on record; last inspected Apr 2026.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 29 Utah facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Utah Dept. of Health & Human Services · Division of Licensing and Background Checks.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Lotus Park Care Centers has 4 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
4 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every DLBC visit, verbatim.
6 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-04-02Annual Compliance VisitSerious · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During a routine annual inspection, the facility was found noncompliant with evacuation requirements because one cognitively impaired and physically disabled resident could not be evacuated by a single staff member, as required by rule. The facility's evacuation procedures did not account for this resident's level of need during an emergency. Correction of this noncompliance was cited.
“The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-10(5)(a). During the inspection, it was discovered that 1 resident, who was cognitively impaired and physically disabled, could not evacuate the facility with the limited assistance of 1 person.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-10(5)(a)-(c)] The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-10(5)(a). During the inspection, it was discovered that 1 resident, who was cognitively impaired and physically disabled, could not evacuate the facility with the limited assistance of 1 person.
2024-09-26Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-09-09Annual Compliance VisitStandard · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During an annual inspection, the facility was found out of compliance with employee training requirements after inspectors requested documentation showing that three employees had completed required annual in-service training and the facility could not provide it. This same violation was previously cited on May 6, 2024, June 13, 2024, and August 6, 2024. The facility has not corrected this noncompliance despite multiple prior citations.
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring each employee received annual in-service training. During the inspection, the licensor requested the in-service training for 3 employee's and was not provided the training documentation. This noncompliance was previously cited on 5/06/2024, 6/13/2024 and 8/6/2024.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-9(9)(a)-(l)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring each employee received annual in-service training. During the inspection, the licensor requested the in-service training for 3 employee's and was not provided the training documentation. This noncompliance was previously cited on 5/06/2024, 6/13/2024 and 8/6/2024.
2024-08-06Annual Compliance VisitStandard · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
During this annual inspection, the facility was found not to have completed required orientation and training for employees within proper timeframes. Four employees lacked documented orientation training within 30 days of hire, and three employees had not received required annual in-service and core competency training; both of these issues had been cited previously in May and June 2024. These noncompliance findings indicate the facility has not corrected training deficiencies identified over the past year.
“The provider was out of compliance on this rule by not ensuring each employee received documented orientation within 30 days of hire. During the inspection, 4 employees did not receive documented orientation, to include a department approved core competency training, within 30 days of hire. This noncompliance was previously cited on 5/06/2024 and 6/13/2024.”
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring each employee received annual in-service and core competency training. During the follow-up inspection, the licensor reviewed 3 employee records and observed that they did not receive the annual and core competency training required by the rule. This noncompliance was previously cited on 5/06/2024 and 6/13/2024.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-9(7)(a)-(f)] The provider was out of compliance on this rule by not ensuring each employee received documented orientation within 30 days of hire. During the inspection, 4 employees did not receive documented orientation, to include a department approved core competency training, within 30 days of hire. This noncompliance was previously cited on 5/06/2024 and 6/13/2024. [R432-270-9(9)(a)-(l)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring each employee received annual in-service and core competency training. During the follow-up inspection, the licensor reviewed 3 employee records and observed that they did not receive the annual and core competency training required by the rule. This noncompliance was previously cited on 5/06/2024 and 6/13/2024.
2024-06-13Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-05-06Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience