Viewpoint Center, LLC.
A medium home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 29 Utah facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Utah Dept. of Health & Human Services · Division of Licensing and Background Checks.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DLBC inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
2 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2026-07-16Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2026-02-02Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2025-09-22Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2025-03-03Complaint InvestigationStandard · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
During this annual inspection, the facility was found out of compliance with reporting requirements after staff failed to file critical incident reports within the required one business day for incidents involving allegations of sexualized misconduct that should have been reported to the Office of Licensing and child protective services. The facility was also out of compliance because it did not obtain written medical authorization every 24 hours for restraints used on a patient, and no restraint authorizations could be provided when requested by the inspector.
Read full citation text (2)Hide full citation text
“The provider was out of compliance with R380-600-7-16(a) by not ensuring the reporting of critical incidents was happening within 1 business day of the critical incident occurrence. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed a sample of incident reports, that per the documentation, necessitated a critical incident report and additional documentation of child protective service referrals for concerns related to “sexualized misconduct, that also would have required a critical incident report to the Office of Licensing. The corresponding critical incident reports were not found in the department’s system.”
“The provider was out of compliance with R432-101-23(7)(a) by not ensuring that a member of the medical staff authorized restraints in writing every 24 hours. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed a sample of incident reports and historical restraint data that indicated that restraints had been utilized on 1 patient at the facility. The licensor requested restraint authorizations for the patient and none were provided.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R380-600-7(16)(a)-(d)] The provider was out of compliance with R380-600-7-16(a) by not ensuring the reporting of critical incidents was happening within 1 business day of the critical incident occurrence. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed a sample of incident reports, that per the documentation, necessitated a critical incident report and additional documentation of child protective service referrals for concerns related to “sexualized misconduct, that also would have required a critical incident report to the Office of Licensing. The corresponding critical incident reports were not found in the department’s system. [R432-101-23(7)(a)-(g)] The provider was out of compliance with R432-101-23(7)(a) by not ensuring that a member of the medical staff authorized restraints in writing every 24 hours. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed a sample of incident reports and historical restraint data that indicated that restraints had been utilized on 1 patient at the facility. The licensor requested restraint authorizations for the patient and none were provided.
Other facilities in Syracuse.
Other memory care facilities near Syracuse with similar care offerings.
Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience