Utah · South Jordan

Legacy House Assisted Living of South Jordan.

Legacy House Assisted Living of South Jordan is Ranked in the top 32% of Utah memory care with 3 DLBC citations on record; last inspected Jun 2025.

Care Facility87 licensed beds · largeDementia-trained staff
1517 West Temple Lane · South Jordan, UT 84095
Legacy House Assisted Living of South Jordan
Legacy House Assisted Living of South Jordan — photo 2
Legacy House Assisted Living of South Jordan — photo 3
Legacy House Assisted Living of South Jordan — photo 4
© Google · Legacy House of South Jordan
Facility · South Jordan
A 87-bed Care Facility with 3 citations on file — most recent Jun 2025. Ranks in the 68th percentile among state peers.
Last inspection · Jun 2025 · cleanSource · DLBC
Licensed beds
87
Memory care
✓ Yes
Last inspection
Jun 2025
Last citation
Jun 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A large home, reviewed on public record.

Peer Comparison

Compared to 35 Utah facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Utah Dept. of Health & Human Services · Division of Licensing and Background Checks.

Severity rank
62nd
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
41st
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

FACILITY WATCH · BETA

Legacy House Assisted Living of South Jordan has 3 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

3 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

3weighted score · 24 mo
0–100 scale · lower = better · peer median 6
Last citation: JUN 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
JUN 2025
Jun 2024as of May 2026

Finding distribution

3 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G
H
I
Sev 2
D
E
F
Sev 1
A3
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every DLBC visit, verbatim.

4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

4
reports on file
3
total deficiencies
2025-06-23
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
2025-06-04
Annual Compliance Visit
Standard · 1 finding

Plain-language summary

During this annual inspection, the facility was found to not have tuberculosis skin test documentation for two employees within the required two-week period after hiring, which is a repeat violation previously cited in January and April 2025. This noncompliance with tuberculosis screening requirements means the facility did not meet state health protection standards for staff. The facility needs to ensure all employees receive and document tuberculosis testing as required by state licensing rules.

StandardR432-270-9(14)(a)-(g)
Verbatim citation text · R432-270-9(14)(a)-(g)

The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-9(14)(e)(i) by not ensuring employees were skin-tested for tuberculosis within two weeks of initial hiring. During the inspection, 2 employee files were reviewed and they did not have documentation of a tuberculosis skin test. This non-compliance was previously cited on January 27, 2025 and April 15, 2025.

Read raw inspector notes

[R432-270-9(14)(a)-(g)] The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-9(14)(e)(i) by not ensuring employees were skin-tested for tuberculosis within two weeks of initial hiring. During the inspection, 2 employee files were reviewed and they did not have documentation of a tuberculosis skin test. This non-compliance was previously cited on January 27, 2025 and April 15, 2025.

2025-04-15
Annual Compliance Visit
Standard · 2 findings

Plain-language summary

During this annual inspection, the facility was found out of compliance with tuberculosis screening requirements—three employees lacked documentation of required skin tests within two weeks of hire, a violation that had previously been cited on January 27, 2025. Additionally, hot water temperatures in the facility exceeded the required maximum of 120 degrees Fahrenheit, measuring 124.5 and 124.4 degrees, which was also a repeat violation from the January 27, 2025 inspection. Both noncompliances remain unresolved from the prior citation.

StandardR432-270-9(14)(a)-(g)Repeat
Verbatim citation text · R432-270-9(14)(a)-(g)

The licensee was out of compliance with Rule R432-270-9(14)(e) by not ensuring employees were skin-tested for tuberculosis within two weeks of initial hiring. During the inspection, 3 employee’s files were reviewed and they did not have documentation of a tuberculosis skin test. This noncompliance was previously cited on January 27, 2025.

StandardR432-270-25(5)Repeat
Verbatim citation text · R432-270-25(5)

The provider was out of compliance with Rule R432-270-25(5) by not ensuring that hot water temperatures were between 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. During the inspection, the hot water temperature was 124.5 degrees Fahrenheit and 124.4 degrees Fahrenheit. This noncompliance was previously cited on January 27, 2025.

Read raw inspector notes

[R432-270-9(14)(a)-(g)] The licensee was out of compliance with Rule R432-270-9(14)(e) by not ensuring employees were skin-tested for tuberculosis within two weeks of initial hiring. During the inspection, 3 employee’s files were reviewed and they did not have documentation of a tuberculosis skin test. This noncompliance was previously cited on January 27, 2025. [R432-270-25(5)] The provider was out of compliance with Rule R432-270-25(5) by not ensuring that hot water temperatures were between 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. During the inspection, the hot water temperature was 124.5 degrees Fahrenheit and 124.4 degrees Fahrenheit. This noncompliance was previously cited on January 27, 2025.

2025-01-27
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.
Editorial Independence

StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from any operator. Rankings are derived solely from state inspection records and verified family reviews.