Beehive Homes of Salem.
Beehive Homes of Salem is Ranked in the bottom 42% of Utah memory care with 7 DLBC citations on record; last inspected Oct 2025.
A medium home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 16 Utah facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Utah Dept. of Health & Human Services · Division of Licensing and Background Checks.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Beehive Homes of Salem has 7 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
7 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
7 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every DLBC visit, verbatim.
6 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-10-21Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2025-09-04Annual Compliance VisitStandard · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During an annual inspection, the facility was found out of compliance with state requirements that a certified nurse aide be on duty 24 hours a day in a Type II Assisted Living Facility; the inspection revealed that nine employees worked alone during multiple shifts without nurse aide certification, and this same violation had been previously cited three times between April and July 2025. The facility has not corrected this staffing requirement issue despite multiple prior citations.
“The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-14(6) by not ensuring that at least one certified nurse aide was on duty in a type II facility 24 hours a day. During the inspection, 9 employee files and the staffing schedule were reviewed. 9 employees worked alone during multiple shifts and were not certified nurse aides. This noncompliance was previously cited on April 30, 2025, June 11, 2025 and July 14, 2025.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-14(6)] The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-14(6) by not ensuring that at least one certified nurse aide was on duty in a type II facility 24 hours a day. During the inspection, 9 employee files and the staffing schedule were reviewed. 9 employees worked alone during multiple shifts and were not certified nurse aides. This noncompliance was previously cited on April 30, 2025, June 11, 2025 and July 14, 2025.
2025-07-14Annual Compliance VisitStandard · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During an annual inspection, the facility was found out of compliance with state requirements to have at least one certified nurse aide on duty 24 hours a day in a Type II facility; staff records and schedules showed that four employees worked alone on multiple shifts without nursing aide certification. This same violation had been cited twice before, on April 30, 2025 and June 11, 2025. The facility has not corrected this staffing requirement despite two prior citations.
“The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-15(6) by not ensuring that at least one certified nurse aide was on duty in a type II facility 24 hours a day. During the inspection, 4 employee files and the staffing schedule were reviewed. Four employees were observed to have worked alone during multiple shifts and were not certified nurse aides. This noncompliance was previously cited on April 30, 2025 and on June 11, 2025.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-15(6)] The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-15(6) by not ensuring that at least one certified nurse aide was on duty in a type II facility 24 hours a day. During the inspection, 4 employee files and the staffing schedule were reviewed. Four employees were observed to have worked alone during multiple shifts and were not certified nurse aides. This noncompliance was previously cited on April 30, 2025 and on June 11, 2025.
2025-06-11Annual Compliance VisitStandard · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
During this annual inspection, the facility was found out of compliance with two requirements that were also cited in a previous inspection on April 30, 2025: a power outlet in room 6 was not properly secured to the wall, creating a potential safety hazard, and the facility failed to maintain at least one certified nurse aide on duty during night shifts, with two employees working alone who were not certified nurse aides. Both violations remained uncorrected from the prior inspection period.
“The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-25(2)(c) by not ensuring the maintenance of electrical systems, including a power outlet was maintained to guarantee safe functioning. During the inspection, one power outlet in room 6 was not properly secured to the wall. This non-compliance was previously cited on April 30, 2025.”
“The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-15(6) by not ensuring that at least one certified nurse aide was on duty in a type II facility 24 hours a day. During the inspection, 2 employees worked alone during the night shift and were not certified nurse aides. This noncompliance was previously cited on April 30, 2025.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-25(2)(a)-(d)] The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-25(2)(c) by not ensuring the maintenance of electrical systems, including a power outlet was maintained to guarantee safe functioning. During the inspection, one power outlet in room 6 was not properly secured to the wall. This non-compliance was previously cited on April 30, 2025. [R432-270-15(6)] The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-15(6) by not ensuring that at least one certified nurse aide was on duty in a type II facility 24 hours a day. During the inspection, 2 employees worked alone during the night shift and were not certified nurse aides. This noncompliance was previously cited on April 30, 2025.
2025-04-30Annual Compliance VisitModerate · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
During this annual inspection, the facility was cited for noncompliance in two areas: hot water temperatures at multiple plumbing fixtures exceeded the required maximum of 120 degrees Fahrenheit, with readings ranging from 122.4 to 125.6 degrees, and cleaning agents, bleaches, and other dangerous or flammable materials were not stored in a locked area as required. The storage issue represented a repeat noncompliance, having been cited previously on February 26, 2025.
“The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-25(5) by not ensuring the hot water temperature, delivered to plumbing fixtures used by residents was maintained at temperatures between 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. During the inspection, the water temperature in the common bathroom was checked and read 125.6 degrees, the water temperature in room 6 was checked and read 122.4 degrees, and the water temperature in the kitchen; which was accessible to residents, was checked and read 123.3 degrees.”
“The Licensee was out of compliance with Rule R432-270-23(5) by not ensuring cleaning agents, bleaches, or poisonous, dangerous, or flammable materials were stored in a locked area to prevent unauthorized access. During the inspection, cleaning agents, bleaches, dangerous, or flammable materials were not stored in an locked area to prevent unauthorized access. This noncompliance was previously cited on 2/26/2025.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-25(5)] The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-25(5) by not ensuring the hot water temperature, delivered to plumbing fixtures used by residents was maintained at temperatures between 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. During the inspection, the water temperature in the common bathroom was checked and read 125.6 degrees, the water temperature in room 6 was checked and read 122.4 degrees, and the water temperature in the kitchen; which was accessible to residents, was checked and read 123.3 degrees. [R432-270-23(5)] The Licensee was out of compliance with Rule R432-270-23(5) by not ensuring cleaning agents, bleaches, or poisonous, dangerous, or flammable materials were stored in a locked area to prevent unauthorized access. During the inspection, cleaning agents, bleaches, dangerous, or flammable materials were not stored in an locked area to prevent unauthorized access. This noncompliance was previously cited on 2/26/2025.
2025-02-26Annual Compliance VisitSerious · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During an annual inspection, the facility was found out of compliance with rules requiring that cleaning agents, bleaches, and other poisonous materials be stored in locked areas. The inspector observed these hazardous materials accessible to residents, and one resident entered the laundry room, ingested a laundry detergent pod, and experienced vomiting and labored breathing requiring hospitalization. The facility must correct this noncompliance to ensure residents cannot access dangerous materials.
“The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-23(5) by not ensuring cleaning agents, bleaches, and poisonous and dangerous materials were stored in a locked area to prevent unauthorized access. During the inspection, the licensor observed several unsecured cleaning agents, bleaches, and other poisonous and dangerous materials accessible to the memory care residents. Additionally, the licensor identified 1 memory care resident who accessed the facility's laundry room, ate a laundry detergent pod, began vomiting and having labored breathing, and was sent to the hospital.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-23(5)] The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-23(5) by not ensuring cleaning agents, bleaches, and poisonous and dangerous materials were stored in a locked area to prevent unauthorized access. During the inspection, the licensor observed several unsecured cleaning agents, bleaches, and other poisonous and dangerous materials accessible to the memory care residents. Additionally, the licensor identified 1 memory care resident who accessed the facility's laundry room, ate a laundry detergent pod, began vomiting and having labored breathing, and was sent to the hospital.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience