Sunridge Assisted Living of Roy.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 35 Utah facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Utah Dept. of Health & Human Services · Division of Licensing and Background Checks.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month DLBC inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
1 deficiency on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
1 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
5 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2026-02-17Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2025-09-17Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2024-12-12Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-05-14Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-04-08Annual Compliance VisitModerate · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During an annual inspection, the facility was found to lack adequate nursing oversight required under state rules. A resident with diet restrictions had orders that were not properly documented in their care assessments, and staff did not receive training on how to safely provide the modified diet, resulting in multiple choking episodes. The facility did not have a registered nurse ensuring that resident assessments and staff training matched the resident's current medical needs.
Read full citation text (1)Hide full citation text
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring the Type II assisted living licensee employed a registered nurse who provided or supervised nursing services which included general health monitoring on each resident. During the inspection, 1 resident was found to have had diet texture modification orders and the registered nurse did not ensure the resident assessments accurately reflected the current diet orders and the facility staff received the necessary training to provide the resident with the required diet, in order to prevent multiple choking episodes.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-15(3)(a)-(c)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring the Type II assisted living licensee employed a registered nurse who provided or supervised nursing services which included general health monitoring on each resident. During the inspection, 1 resident was found to have had diet texture modification orders and the registered nurse did not ensure the resident assessments accurately reflected the current diet orders and the facility staff received the necessary training to provide the resident with the required diet, in order to prevent multiple choking episodes.
Contract Decoder
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience