Quail Meadows Assisted Living and Memory Care.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 29 Utah facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Utah Dept. of Health & Human Services · Division of Licensing and Background Checks.
Rankings based on 36-month DLBC inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
10 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
10 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
10 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2026-06-16Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2026-04-27Annual Compliance VisitModerate · 2 findings
“The licensee was out of compliance with R380-80-4(1) by failing to protect residents from neglect. Neglect is defined in R380-80 as “abandonment or failure to provide necessary care, including nutrition, education, clothing, shelter, sleep, bedding, supervision, health care, hygiene, treatment, or protection from harm." During the inspection, the licensor observed that the facility’s secure unit was unlocked and residents with cognitive deficits were left unsupervised. ”
“The licensee was out of compliance with R380-600-4(1)(a) by failing to submit a complete program change application at least 30 days before an increase of secure unit beds. During the inspection, the licensor observed that the number of secure beds had increased. The licensor checked the facility’s license, which did not reflect the increase of secure beds. ”
2024-11-20Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-10-23Annual Compliance VisitStandard · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
During this annual inspection, the facility was found out of compliance with two rules that had been previously cited multiple times since June 2024. Emergency contact information for medical personnel and agencies was not posted in public areas throughout the facility, and housekeeping staff had not received required training on cleaning solutions, equipment use, linen handling, and waste disposal procedures. Both violations represent repeated noncompliance issues that the facility has not corrected despite prior citations.
Read full citation text (2)Hide full citation text
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not posting emergency information in public locations throughout the facility. During the inspection, a general tour of the facility was conducted and the names and numbers of emergency medical personnel, agencies, and appropriate communication, and emergency transport systems were not observed in public areas of the facility. This non-compliance was previously cited on 6/18/2024, 8/6/2024 and 9/18/2024.”
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring housekeeping personnel were trained. During the inspection, the training for housekeeping personnel was reviewed. It did not include the following: preparing and using cleaning solutions; proper use of equipment; proper handling of clean and soiled linen; and procedures for disposal of waste. This non-compliance was previously cited on 6/18/2024, 8/6/2024 and 9/18/2024.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-26(11)(a-b)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not posting emergency information in public locations throughout the facility. During the inspection, a general tour of the facility was conducted and the names and numbers of emergency medical personnel, agencies, and appropriate communication, and emergency transport systems were not observed in public areas of the facility. This non-compliance was previously cited on 6/18/2024, 8/6/2024 and 9/18/2024. [R432-270-23(6)(a)-(e)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring housekeeping personnel were trained. During the inspection, the training for housekeeping personnel was reviewed. It did not include the following: preparing and using cleaning solutions; proper use of equipment; proper handling of clean and soiled linen; and procedures for disposal of waste. This non-compliance was previously cited on 6/18/2024, 8/6/2024 and 9/18/2024.
2024-09-18Annual Compliance VisitStandard · 3 findings
Plain-language summary
During an annual inspection, noncompliance was cited in three areas: housekeeping personnel had not received required training on cleaning solutions, procedures, equipment use, linen handling, and waste disposal; emergency contact information for medical personnel and transport services was not posted in public areas of the facility; and four residents did not receive their medications according to their prescriptions. All three violations had been previously cited in June and August 2024, indicating they remained uncorrected. The facility was found to be out of compliance with state licensing rules in each of these areas.
Read full citation text (3)Hide full citation text
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring housekeeping personnel were trained. During the inspection, the training for housekeeping personnel was reviewed. It did not include the following: preparing and using cleaning solutions; cleaning procedures; proper use of equipment; proper handling of clean and soiled linen; and procedures for disposal of waste. This non-compliance was previously cited on 6/18/2024 and on 8/6/2024.”
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not posting emergency information in public locations throughout the facility. During the inspection, a general tour of the facility was conducted and the names and numbers of emergency medical personnel, agencies, and appropriate communication, and emergency transport systems were not observed in public areas of the facility. This non-compliance was previously cited on 6/18/2024 and 8/6/2024.”
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring medications were administered according to the prescribing orders. During the inspection, 4 residents did not receive their medications as prescribed. This non-compliance was previously cited on 8/6/2024.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-23(6)(a)-(e)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring housekeeping personnel were trained. During the inspection, the training for housekeeping personnel was reviewed. It did not include the following: preparing and using cleaning solutions; cleaning procedures; proper use of equipment; proper handling of clean and soiled linen; and procedures for disposal of waste. This non-compliance was previously cited on 6/18/2024 and on 8/6/2024. [R432-270-26(11)(a-b)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not posting emergency information in public locations throughout the facility. During the inspection, a general tour of the facility was conducted and the names and numbers of emergency medical personnel, agencies, and appropriate communication, and emergency transport systems were not observed in public areas of the facility. This non-compliance was previously cited on 6/18/2024 and 8/6/2024. [R432-270-19(7)(a)-(f)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring medications were administered according to the prescribing orders. During the inspection, 4 residents did not receive their medications as prescribed. This non-compliance was previously cited on 8/6/2024.
2024-08-06Annual Compliance VisitSerious · 1 finding
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring medications were administered according to the prescribing orders. During the inspection, 3 residents did not receive their medications as prescribed.”
2024-08-06Complaint InvestigationSerious · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that the facility failed to administer medications according to prescribing orders, with three residents not receiving their medications as prescribed during the inspection. The facility was cited for noncompliance with Utah's medication administration requirements.
Read full citation text (1)Hide full citation text
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring medications were administered according to the prescribing orders. During the inspection, 3 residents did not receive their medications as prescribed.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-19(7)(a)-(f)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring medications were administered according to the prescribing orders. During the inspection, 3 residents did not receive their medications as prescribed.
2024-06-18Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-06-04Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-04-24Complaint InvestigationSerious · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During a routine inspection, the facility was found to be out of compliance with background clearance requirements: an employee who had been determined ineligible for direct patient access was working in a position with direct patient access to residents. The licensor reviewed the employee's file in the Direct Access Clearance System and confirmed the individual should not have been in that role. This violation of R432-35-4(6) indicates a failure in the facility's hiring or employment verification procedures.
Read full citation text (1)Hide full citation text
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by ensuring that covered individuals who had been determined not eligible for direct patient access were not working in a position with direct patient access. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee's file in the Direct Access Clearance System and observed that the individual had been determined not eligible for employment and was working in the facility with direct patient access.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-35-4(6)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by ensuring that covered individuals who had been determined not eligible for direct patient access were not working in a position with direct patient access. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 1 employee's file in the Direct Access Clearance System and observed that the individual had been determined not eligible for employment and was working in the facility with direct patient access.
Facility Watch · Premium
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience