Utah · Nephi

Laurel Groves Assisted Living.

Care Facility34 bedsDementia-trained staff(435) 623-5000
Peer rank
Top 34% of Utah memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Nephi
A 34-bed Care Facility with 2 citations on file.
Licensed beds
34
Last inspection
Mar 2026
Last citation
Nov 2025
Operated by
Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

Peer Comparison

Compared to 29 Utah facilities with a similar number of beds.

Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Utah Dept. of Health & Human Services · Division of Licensing and Background Checks.

Severity rank
43rd%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
54th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month DLBC inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

FACILITY WATCH · FREE

Laurel Groves Assisted Living has 2 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

Where are you in the process? (optional)

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: NOV 2025. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
NOV 2025
Aug 2024as of Jul 2026

Finding distribution

2 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G1
H
I
Sev 2
D1
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

5 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

5
reports on file
2
total deficiencies
2026-03-30
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
2025-11-12
Complaint Investigation
Serious · 1 finding

Plain-language summary

During a routine inspection, a resident eloped from the facility and sustained a head injury, indicating noncompliance with requirements to protect residents from neglect. The facility failed to prevent the resident from leaving unsupervised, which resulted in harm to the resident's health and safety. Correction of this violation is required.

SeriousR380-80-5(4)
Verbatim citation text · R380-80-5(4)

The provider was out of compliance with R380-80-5(4) by not protecting residents from neglect. During inspection, one resident was identified to have eloped from the facility and sustained a head injury, which compromised the health and safety of the resident.

Read raw inspector notes

[R380-80-5(4)] The provider was out of compliance with R380-80-5(4) by not protecting residents from neglect. During inspection, one resident was identified to have eloped from the facility and sustained a head injury, which compromised the health and safety of the resident.

2024-08-20
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
2024-07-16
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
2024-06-03
Annual Compliance Visit
Moderate · 1 finding

Plain-language summary

During an annual inspection, the facility was found to be operating a locked secure unit for residents with memory care needs, but the facility was not licensed to have secured beds. The inspection revealed that four residents in locked units had memory care diagnoses, which meant the facility was preventing these residents from leaving their rooms or the unit at any time, in violation of state licensing rules. This noncompliance indicates the facility was providing a level of restriction not permitted under its current license type.

ModerateR432-270-10(5)(a)-(x)
Verbatim citation text · R432-270-10(5)(a)-(x)

The provider was out of compliance with the rule by not ensuring each resident could leave the facility at any time and not be locked into any room, building or on the facility premises during the day or night. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed four (4) resident files that indicated the resident required memory care and required a secured unit for safety. The licensor conducted an environmental tour of the facility and observed the facility to have a locked secure unit. The licensor verified that the facility was not licensed to have secured beds.

Read raw inspector notes

[R432-270-10(5)(a)-(x)] The provider was out of compliance with the rule by not ensuring each resident could leave the facility at any time and not be locked into any room, building or on the facility premises during the day or night. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed four (4) resident files that indicated the resident required memory care and required a secured unit for safety. The licensor conducted an environmental tour of the facility and observed the facility to have a locked secure unit. The licensor verified that the facility was not licensed to have secured beds.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.
Editorial Independence

The memory care site on the family's side: StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from facilities.