Bellaview Assisted Living and Memory Care.
Bellaview Assisted Living and Memory Care is Ranked in the top 44% of Utah memory care with 5 DLBC citations on record; last inspected Aug 2025.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 35 Utah facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Utah Dept. of Health & Human Services · Division of Licensing and Background Checks.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Bellaview Assisted Living and Memory Care has 5 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
5 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
5 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every DLBC visit, verbatim.
12 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-08-05Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2025-06-05Complaint InvestigationModerate · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During a routine inspection, noncompliance was cited because one resident did not receive the safety checks that were documented in their service plan. The facility failed to ensure services were performed according to the resident's written plan as required by state rules. The finding did not involve a complaint.
“The provider was out of compliance with R432-270-9(2) by not ensuring services were performed in accordance with the resident's written service plan. During the inspection, the licensor identified 1 resident who did not receive appropriate safety checks as identified on the resident's written service plan.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-9(2)] The provider was out of compliance with R432-270-9(2) by not ensuring services were performed in accordance with the resident's written service plan. During the inspection, the licensor identified 1 resident who did not receive appropriate safety checks as identified on the resident's written service plan.
2025-03-13Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2025-03-04Annual Compliance VisitSerious · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During an annual inspection, the facility was found not in compliance with requirements to protect residents from neglect and unsafe conditions. One former resident did not receive required safety checks or pain medication for approximately 10 hours, and medical records for two current residents lacked documentation that staff were performing required safety checks. The violations indicate gaps in monitoring and care delivery at the facility.
“The provider was out of compliance with R380-80-5(4) by not ensuring residents were protected from neglect and any action that compromised the health and safety of clients through acts or omissions. During the inspection, the licensor identified that 1 former resident did not receive the required safety checks or pain medication for approximately 10 hours. Additionally, the licensor identified that 2 current residents' medical records did not contain evidence that safety checks were being provided by staff.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R380-80-5(4)] The provider was out of compliance with R380-80-5(4) by not ensuring residents were protected from neglect and any action that compromised the health and safety of clients through acts or omissions. During the inspection, the licensor identified that 1 former resident did not receive the required safety checks or pain medication for approximately 10 hours. Additionally, the licensor identified that 2 current residents' medical records did not contain evidence that safety checks were being provided by staff.
2025-01-03Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-12-27Annual Compliance VisitModerate · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During the annual inspection, noncompliance was cited for failure to timely report a critical incident to the state licensing office. An incident that occurred on December 25, 2024, was not reported until December 27, 2024, which exceeded the required one business day reporting deadline. Correction of this violation was required.
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not reporting a critical incident to the Office within one business day. During review of critical incidents it was identified that the incident occurred on 12/25/2024 and was not reported until 12/27/2024.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R380-600-7(16)(a)-(d)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not reporting a critical incident to the Office within one business day. During review of critical incidents it was identified that the incident occurred on 12/25/2024 and was not reported until 12/27/2024.
2024-12-12Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-12-02Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-10-15Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-09-09Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-03-11Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-02-15Complaint InvestigationStandard · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
During a routine annual inspection, the facility was found out of compliance with two rules related to resident care and documentation. Written incident reports were not maintained for two abuse investigations that required departmental review, violating documentation requirements. Additionally, a resident who sustained a fall with a fracture did not receive adequate care and services beyond monitoring, violating the facility's obligation to provide assistance in obtaining required services and preventing deterioration of conditions.
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring written incident and injury reports were maintained to document resident death, injuries, suspected abuse or neglect, and other situations or circumstances affecting the health, safety, or well-being of residents. During the inspection, 2 abuse investigations were reviewed and did not include the written incident reports for department review.”
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring assistance was provided to all residents in obtaining required services; including care needed to prevent, to the extent possible, the deterioration of a condition or to sustain current capacities. During the inspection, 1 resident's file was reviewed and revealed that the resident sustained a fall with a fracture and care and services, besides monitoring, were not provided for that resident.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-21(6)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring written incident and injury reports were maintained to document resident death, injuries, suspected abuse or neglect, and other situations or circumstances affecting the health, safety, or well-being of residents. During the inspection, 2 abuse investigations were reviewed and did not include the written incident reports for department review. [R432-270-15(5)(a)-(b)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring assistance was provided to all residents in obtaining required services; including care needed to prevent, to the extent possible, the deterioration of a condition or to sustain current capacities. During the inspection, 1 resident's file was reviewed and revealed that the resident sustained a fall with a fracture and care and services, besides monitoring, were not provided for that resident.
Other facilities in Lehi.
Other memory care facilities near Lehi with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience