Spring Gardens Heber.
Spring Gardens Heber is Ranked in the top 43% of Utah memory care with 4 DLBC citations on record; last inspected Apr 2026.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 35 Utah facilities with a similar number of beds.
Care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Utah Dept. of Health & Human Services · Division of Licensing and Background Checks.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Spring Gardens Heber has 4 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
4 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
4 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every DLBC visit, verbatim.
9 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-04-06Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
During a monitoring visit, inspectors found that the facility allowed a staff member who had been determined ineligible for employment to work in a position with direct access to residents. This violated state rules requiring background check clearance before allowing anyone with direct resident contact to be employed at the facility. The noncompliance was cited during the inspection.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-35-3(6)] The provider was out of compliance with R32-35-6 by allowing a covered individual, who had been determined “Not Eligible for Employment,” to engage in a position with direct patient access. During the inspection, the licensor determined one covered individual, who had been determined “Not Eligible for Employment,” was allowed to engage in a position with direct patient access.
2026-04-06Complaint InvestigationSerious · 1 finding
“Not Eligible may not work”
2026-03-16Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2026-02-23Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2026-01-20Complaint InvestigationSerious · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
During a routine inspection, the facility was found to have failed to provide adequate nursing oversight and health monitoring for a resident, including failure to implement medical orders from an outside provider and failure to communicate the resident's needs to staff. The same resident developed a severe pressure injury that worsened to expose bone because the facility did not follow repositioning orders or implement care recommendations from hospice and the dietitian, causing the resident preventable pain and suffering. The facility was cited for noncompliance with nursing supervision requirements and resident protection from neglect.
“The provider was out of compliance with R432-270-14(3)(b) not by ensuring the Type II assisted living licensee’s registered nurse provided or supervised nursing services, including the general health monitoring on each resident. During the inspection, it was determined the licensee’s registered nurse failed to ensure general health monitoring of one resident, which included the lack of implementation of medical orders from an outside agency provider, the lack of incorporation of recommendations from an outside consultant, and the lack of assurance the facility staff were informed of the resident’s needs. The provider failed to provide and document all appropriate and required healthcare services.”
“The provider was out of compliance with R380-80-5(4) by not ensuring a resident was protected from neglect and acts of omission that compromised their health. During the inspection, it was determined that one resident, who had orders for repositioning assistance that were not implemented by the facility staff, developed a pressure injury that progressed to a wound which eventually tunneled and exposed the resident’s sacral bone. The licensee failed to provide the services recommended by hospice and the facility dietitian which were intended to prevent the decline of the wound and the resident’s health. The patient suffered preventable pain and suffering.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-14(3)(a)-(c)] The provider was out of compliance with R432-270-14(3)(b) not by ensuring the Type II assisted living licensee’s registered nurse provided or supervised nursing services, including the general health monitoring on each resident. During the inspection, it was determined the licensee’s registered nurse failed to ensure general health monitoring of one resident, which included the lack of implementation of medical orders from an outside agency provider, the lack of incorporation of recommendations from an outside consultant, and the lack of assurance the facility staff were informed of the resident’s needs. The provider failed to provide and document all appropriate and required healthcare services. [R380-80-5(4)] The provider was out of compliance with R380-80-5(4) by not ensuring a resident was protected from neglect and acts of omission that compromised their health. During the inspection, it was determined that one resident, who had orders for repositioning assistance that were not implemented by the facility staff, developed a pressure injury that progressed to a wound which eventually tunneled and exposed the resident’s sacral bone. The licensee failed to provide the services recommended by hospice and the facility dietitian which were intended to prevent the decline of the wound and the resident’s health. The patient suffered preventable pain and suffering.
2025-10-20Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2025-01-31Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-09-10Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-07-29Annual Compliance VisitStandard · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During an annual inspection, the facility was found out of compliance with resident rights protections, specifically the requirement to ensure residents are free from abuse. Two discharged residents were identified as potential victims of abuse by a former employee. The facility failed to meet Utah licensing standards in this area.
“The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring residents' rights, including the right to be free from abuse. During the inspection, 2 discharged residents were identified as potential victims of abuse by a former employee.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
[R432-270-10(5)(a)-(x)] The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring residents' rights, including the right to be free from abuse. During the inspection, 2 discharged residents were identified as potential victims of abuse by a former employee.
Other facilities in Heber City.
Other memory care facilities near Heber City with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience