The Heritage at St. Paul Homes.

A large home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 150 Pennsylvania facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Pennsylvania Department of Human Services, Office of Long-Term Living.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month PA DHS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
9 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
9 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2026-02-03Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2025-06-17Annual Compliance VisitCitation · 2 findings
“Residents #2, #4, and #5 participated in the development of their support plans but did not sign them, and there was no notation indicating the residents were unable or unwilling to sign.”
“The initial support plans for residents #2, #4, and #5 admitted to the Secured Dementia Care Unit were not dated, making it impossible to determine if they were developed within 72 hours of admission as required.”
2024-06-06Annual Compliance VisitCitation · 7 findings
“An unsecured enabler bar was attached to the bed in bedroom #427 with approximately a 3-inch gap between the post and mattress, and the post moved approximately 5 inches back and forth. This is a repeat violation from 4/21/23.”
“An unsealed plastic bag containing 5 hash browns and 9 cookies was found in the walk-in freezer.”
“An unlabeled and undated plastic bag containing 5 hash browns and 9 cookies was found in the walk-in freezer, making it impossible to determine if the food was outdated or spoiled.”
“Resident #1's medications were not stored with pharmacy labels attached. Resident #2's medication label did not accurately reflect the prescribed dosage and administration instructions for insulin administration.”
“Resident #3's glucometer was not calibrated to the correct date/time. Resident #1's glucometer readings did not match the values recorded on the medication administration record. This is a repeat violation from 4/21/23.”
“Resident #4's medication label indicated an incorrect dose compared to the physician's prescription for a medication prescribed to be taken by mouth once a day.”
“Resident #1's medication administration record did not match the prescribed dosage based on blood glucose readings. Resident #4 received a medication dose that did not match the prescriber's orders.”
27 older inspections from 2010 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience