Jurgens Park Senior Living.
Jurgens Park Senior Living is Grade B, ranked in the top 30% of Oregon memory care with 13 OR DHS citations on record; last inspected Jul 2025.

A large home, reviewed on public record.
Ranked against 32 Oregon facilities.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Oregon Dept. of Human Services · Long-Term Care Licensing.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Jurgens Park Senior Living has 13 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
13 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
13 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Jurgens Park Senior Living's record and state requirements.
The facility holds an Oregon DHS Memory Care Endorsement and has 54 inspection reports on file with 47 deficiencies recorded — can you walk us through the corrective action plans for the most frequently cited issues and show documentation of how those deficiencies were resolved?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The most recent inspection occurred on July 9, 2025 — can you provide a copy of that inspection report and explain what deficiencies, if any, were cited and what steps the facility took to address them?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
With 49 complaints on file with Oregon DHS, what is your process for investigating resident or family concerns, and can you share examples of how complaints have led to policy or practice changes here?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every OR-DHS visit, verbatim.
18 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-07-09Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2025-06-17Complaint Investigation1 · Abuse: Neglect
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated that the facility failed to provide a safe environment. The investigation outcome was not substantiated, meaning no violation was found.
“Failed to provide safe environment”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to provide safe environment
2025-06-09Complaint Investigation1 · Abuse: Neglect
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated alleging the facility failed to provide a safe environment. The investigation did not substantiate a violation of licensing rules.
“Failed to provide safe environment”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to provide safe environment
2025-05-13Complaint Investigation1 · Abuse: Neglect
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated alleging the facility failed to provide a safe environment. The investigation did not substantiate the complaint. No violations were found.
“Failed to provide safe environment”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to provide safe environment
2025-04-28Complaint Investigation1 · Abuse: Neglect
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that the facility failed to properly plan care for a resident. The specific details of what care planning deficiencies were identified are not provided in the available information.
“Failed to properly plan care”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to properly plan care
2025-03-27Complaint Investigation1 · Abuse: Neglect
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated alleging that the facility failed to follow a resident's care plan. The investigation found a licensing violation—the facility did not implement care procedures as documented in the resident's plan. No additional details are available about the specific care areas affected.
“Failed to follow care plan”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to follow care plan
2025-02-21Complaint Investigation1 · Abuse: Neglect
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that the facility failed to provide a required service to a resident. The specific service and circumstances were not detailed in the available inspection documentation.
“Failed to provide service”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to provide service
2025-02-20Complaint Investigation1 · Abuse: Neglect
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated alleging the facility failed to provide a service. The investigation determined the complaint was not substantiated and no licensing violation was found.
“Failed to provide service”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to provide service
2025-01-21Complaint Investigation1 · Abuse: Neglect
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated regarding failure to provide or assist with hygiene. The investigation did not substantiate a violation of this requirement.
“Failed to provide or assist with hygiene”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to provide or assist with hygiene
2025-01-15Complaint Investigation1 · Abuse: Neglect
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted regarding failure to provide a safe environment. The outcome of this investigation was not determined or documented in the available record. Families should contact Oregon DHS Long-Term Care Licensing directly for the final result of this complaint.
“Failed to provide safe environment”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to provide safe environment
2024-12-19Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-08-27Complaint Investigation1 · Licensing Violation
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated alleging that a resident was not protected from inappropriate sexual contact. The investigation did not substantiate the complaint. No licensing violation was found.
“Failed to protect resident from inappropriate sexual contact”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to protect resident from inappropriate sexual contact
2024-05-02Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-02-13Complaint Investigation1 · Licensing Violation
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that the facility failed to provide required social services to residents. No further details about the specific services or residents affected are available in this summary.
“Failed to provide social services”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to provide social services
2024-02-07Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2023-12-23Complaint Investigation1 · Licensing Violation
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated that the facility failed to protect a resident from involuntary seclusion. The investigation outcome has not been finalized or disclosed in available records.
“Failed to protect resident from involuntary seclusion”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to protect resident from involuntary seclusion
2023-08-26Complaint Investigation1 · Licensing Violation
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that the facility failed to report potential or suspected abuse as required by Oregon law. The facility did not meet its mandatory reporting obligations under ORS Chapter 443 licensing rules.
“Failed to report potential or suspected abuse”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to report potential or suspected abuse
2023-05-30Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
32 older inspections from 2012 are not shown in the free view.
32 older inspections (2012–2023) are available with a premium membership.
Other facilities in Washington County.
Other memory care facilities in Washington County with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.
