Pacific Living Centers of Roseburg at Ramp.
Pacific Living Centers of Roseburg at Ramp is Grade A−, ranked in the top 19% of Oregon memory care with 5 OR DHS citations on record; last inspected Apr 2026.
A medium home, reviewed on public record.
Ranked against 118 Oregon facilities.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Oregon Dept. of Human Services · Long-Term Care Licensing.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Pacific Living Centers of Roseburg at Ramp has 5 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
5 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
5 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Pacific Living Centers of Roseburg at Ramp's record and state requirements.
Oregon DHS has 119 inspection reports on file for this 30-bed community, documenting 108 deficiencies — can you walk us through the most common themes in those findings and show us your current corrective action plans?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The facility holds an Oregon DHS Memory Care Endorsement and the most recent inspection was April 2, 2026 — can you provide a copy of that inspection report and explain any deficiencies cited related to dementia care policies or resident safety?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
With 114 complaints on file with Oregon DHS, what documentation can you share about how complaints are investigated internally, and can families review summaries of substantiated complaints and the steps taken to resolve them?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every OR-DHS visit, verbatim.
11 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-04-02Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2026-02-13Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2025-06-10Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2025-03-13Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-12-27Complaint Investigation1 · Abuse: Neglect
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated alleging the facility failed to provide a safe environment. The investigation did not substantiate the complaint. No violations were found.
“Failed to provide safe environment”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to provide safe environment
2024-06-29Complaint Investigation1 · Licensing Violation
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that the facility failed to report potential or suspected abuse as required by state law. The facility did not meet its mandatory reporting obligation under Oregon regulations. This is a licensing violation.
“Failed to report potential or suspected abuse”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to report potential or suspected abuse
2024-06-24Complaint Investigation1 · Licensing Violation
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated regarding failure to protect a resident from physical abuse. The investigation substantiated the complaint, finding that the facility did not prevent or respond appropriately to physical abuse of a resident. The facility was required to correct this licensing violation.
“Failed to protect resident from physical abuse”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to protect resident from physical abuse
2024-04-08Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
2024-03-18Complaint InvestigationNo findings
2023-10-18Complaint Investigation1 · Abuse: Neglect
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that the facility failed to provide a required service to a resident. The specific service and circumstances were not detailed in the available documentation. No additional information about corrective action or licensing violations was included in this record.
“Failed to provide service”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to provide service
2023-07-07Complaint Investigation1 · Licensing Violation
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated alleging that the facility failed to follow a resident's care plan. The investigation found a licensing violation: the facility did not implement care plan directives as required. Families should understand that care plans are legal documents that must be followed to ensure residents receive the care they need.
“Failed to follow care plan”
Full inspector notes
—: Failed to follow care plan
39 older inspections from 2017 are not shown in the free view.
39 older inspections (2017–2023) are available with a premium membership.
Other facilities in Douglas County.
Other memory care facilities in Douglas County with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.