Edgewood May Creek Llc.
Edgewood May Creek Llc is Grade C, ranked in the top 48% of Minnesota memory care with 1 MDH citation on record; last inspected Jul 2025.
A medium home, reviewed on public record.
Ranked against 187 Minnesota facilities.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Minnesota Dept. of Health · Health Regulation Division.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Edgewood May Creek Llc has 1 citation on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
1 deficiencie on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
1 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Edgewood May Creek Llc's record and state requirements.
The most recent Minnesota Department of Health inspection was conducted on July 16, 2025 and found zero deficiencies — can you walk us through how the community prepares for state surveys and what documentation you maintain to demonstrate compliance with assisted living and dementia care requirements?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
One complaint was filed with MDH during the inspection period on record — can you share whether that complaint was substantiated, and if so, what corrective steps the facility took and what documentation exists to show the issue was resolved?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
This facility holds an Assisted Living Facility with Dementia Care license under Minnesota Statute chapter 144G — can you provide a copy of your written dementia care program and explain how staff competency in dementia care is assessed and documented across all shifts?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every MDH visit, verbatim.
2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-07-16Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A standard inspection on July 16, 2025, found a violation related to fire protection and the physical environment at this facility, resulting in a $500 fine assessed under Minnesota law. The facility must document the actions taken to correct this violation and may request reconsideration or a hearing within 15 days if they wish to challenge the finding.
Full inspector notes
correction orders and document the actions taken to comply in the facility's records. The Department reserves the right to return to the facility at any time should the Department receive a complaint or deem it necessary to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of residents in your care. STATE CORRECTION ORDERS The enclosed State Form documents the state correction orders. MDH documents state licensing correction orders using federal software. Tag numbers are assigned to Minnesota state statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state statute number and the corresponding text of the state statute out of compliance are listed in the "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" column. This column also includes the findings that are in violation of the state statute after the statement, "This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by . . ." IMPOSITION OF FINES In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31, Subd. 4, fines and enforcement actions may be imposed based on the level and scope of the violations and may be imposed immediately with no opportunity to correct the violation first as follows: Level 1: no fines or enforcement; Level 2: a fine of $500 per violation, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20; Level 3: a fine of $1,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20; Level 4: a fine of $3,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in An equal opportunity employer. Letter ID: IS7N REVISED 09/13/2021 Edgewood May Creek LLC September 3, 2025 Page 2 § 144G.20; Level 5: a fine of $5,000 per violation, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20. Therefore, in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 144G.01 to 144G.9999, the following fines are assessed pursuant to this survey: St - 0 - 0775 - 144g.45 Subd. 2. (a) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment - $500.00 Therefore, in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 144G.01 to 144G.9999, t he total amount you are assessed is $500.00. You will be invoiced approximately 30 days after receipt of this notice, subject to appeal. In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31 Subd. 4, MDH may assess fines based on the level and scope of the violations; h owever, no immediate fines are assessed for this survey of your facility. DOCUMENTATION OF ACTION TO COMPLY In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.30, Subd. 5(c), the licensee must document actions taken to comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. The correction order documentation should include the following: Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected related to the resident(s)/employee(s) identified in the correction order. Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected for all of the provider’s resident(s)/employees that may be affected by the noncompliance. Identify what changes to your systems and practices were made to ensure compliance with the specific statute(s). CORRECTION ORDER RECONSIDERATION PROCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.32, Subd. 2, you may challenge the correction order(s) issued, including the level and scope, and any fine assessed through the correction order reconsideration process. The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. To submit a reconsideration request, please visit: https://forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/HRDAppealsForm REQUESTING A HEARING Alternatively, in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31, Subd. 5(d), an assisted living provider that has been assessed a fine under this subdivision has a right to a reconsideration or a hearing under this section and chapter 14. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 144G.20, Subd. 14 and Subd. 18, a request for a hearing must be in writing and received by the Department of Health within 15 business days of the Edgewood May Creek LLC September 3, 2025 Page 3 correction order receipt date. The request must contain a brief and plain statement describing each matter or issue contested and any new information you believe constitutes a defense or mitigating factor. To submit a hearing request, please visit: https://forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/HRDAppealsForm To appeal fines via reconsideration, please follow the procedure outlined above. P lease note that you may request a reconsideration o r a hearing, but not both. If you wish to contest tags without fines in a reconsideration and tags with the fines at a hearing, please submit two separate appeals forms at the website listed above. The MDH Health Regulation Division (HRD) values your feedback about your experience during the survey and/or investigation process. Please fill out this anonymous provider feedback questionnaire at your convenience at this link: h ttps://forms.office.com/g/Bm5uQEpHVa. Your input is important to us and will enable MDH to improve its processes and communication with providers. If you have any questions regarding the questionnaire, please contact Susan Winkelmann at susan.winkelmann@state.mn.us or call 651-201-5952. You are encouraged to retain this document for your records. It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and state form with your organization’s Governing Body. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jessie Chenze, Supervisor State Evaluation Team Email: Jessie.Chenze@state.mn.us Telephone: 218-332-5175 Fax: 1-866-890-9290 AH PRINTED: 09/03/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 30760 07/16/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 303 10TH STREET SOUTH EDGEWOOD MAY CREEK LLC WALKER, MN 56484 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 ***ATTENTION*** Minnesota Department of Health is documenting the State Correction Orders ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING using federal software. Tag numbers have CORRECTION ORDER(S) been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section assigned tag number appears in the 144G.08 to 144G.95, these correction orders are far-left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The issued pursuant to a survey. state Statute number and the corresponding text of the state Statute out Determination of whether violations are corrected of compliance is listed in the "Summary requires compliance with all requirements Statement of Deficiencies" column. This provided at the Statute number indicated below. column also includes the findings which When Minnesota Statute contains several items, are in violation of the state requirement failure to comply with any of the items will be after the statement, "This Minnesota considered lack of compliance. requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the evaluators ' findings is the INITIAL COMMENTS: Time Period for Correction. SL30760160 PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH On July 14, 2025 through July 16, 2025, the STATES,"PROVIDER'S PLAN OF survey at the above provider and the following FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS correction orders are issued. At the time of the WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. survey, there were 43 residents; 42 receiving services under the Assisted Living Facility with THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO Dementia Care license. SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES. THE LETTER IN THE LEFT COLUMN IS USED FOR TRACKING PURPOSES AND REFLECTS THE SCOPE AND LEVEL ISSUED PURSUANT TO 144G.31 SUBDIVISION 1-3. 0 470 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements 0 470 SS=D (11) develop and implement a staffing plan for LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 EF0311 If continuation sheet 1 of 46 PRINTED: 09/03/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B.
2024-10-31Complaint Investigation1 · Substantiated Finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that a resident's September 2024 assessment did not accurately reflect her significant recent weight loss and incorrectly stated she had ongoing wound care that had actually resolved by May 2024; the assessment also indicated she was independent with medications and activities of daily living, but an unsigned October 2024 service plan listed no specific services from her assigned service package level. Documentation showed the resident refused assisted living services beyond nursing evaluations and that facility staff discussed with her and her power of attorney the licensing requirements and service costs, though the power of attorney reported feeling pressured regarding a billing adjustment.
“MDH substantiated maltreatment or licensing violation finding”
Full inspector notes
Findings include: R1 was admitted to the facility on June 1, 2021. R1's diagnoses include high blood pressure. R1's assessment dated September 16, 2024, indicated the resident did not have any recent weight gain or weight loss and her weight had been stable. However, documentation provided by the facility indicated the resident had experienced a recent significant weight loss. The assessment indicated resident had wound care from the facility and an outside home care provider, however the resident's wound had been resolved since at least May 2024. The assessment indicated the resident was independent with activities of daily living and managed her own medications. R1's service plan dated June 2, 2021, indicated the resident was on service package level one STATE FORM 6899 FXDJ11 If continuation sheet 2 of 12 PRINTED: 10/31/2024 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 30760 10/22/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 303 10TH STREET SOUTH EDGEWOOD MAY CREEK LLC WALKER, MN 56484 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 02350 Continued From page 2 02350 and received dressing changes to a wound daily by unlicensed staff and supervision from the RN once per week. R1's record contained an unsigned service plan dated October 11, 2024, which indicated the resident was on service package level one but no services from that package level were identified on the service plan. A Leveling Tool document indicated the service the resident was receiving was a licensed nurse evaluation other than the initial evaluation. R1's progress notes contained the following entries: -October 16, 2024, LALD-A documented that the resident to "let me know that she was refusing the 90-day required nursing assessments on her service plan. I reviewed with her the information that was settled at the last care conference. We are licensed as assisted living with dementia care and we did not have independent living situations in our community. I did let her know that if she did not feel that she needed assisted living any more, there are other communities that are licensed for independent living. I further explained that those communities that have assisted and independent living have separate residency agreements for each of those situations. She again stated that she does not want nor need assisted living, she does, however, like that grab bars in the bathroom. I did say that those are assistive medical devices that can be installed in private and independent units. I also told her that when she first came to May Creek, she needed that assisted living help due to the wound care. If she no longer required assisted living, that is a good thing, that means that she is doing well. She brought up the cost of what she was paying for the assisted living Room and Board and Service STATE FORM 6899 FXDJ11 If continuation sheet 3 of 12 PRINTED: 10/31/2024 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 30760 10/22/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 303 10TH STREET SOUTH EDGEWOOD MAY CREEK LLC WALKER, MN 56484 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 02350 Continued From page 3 02350 Plan. I responded that we were unsure of why she would want to pay to be in assisted living if she refused to be assisted by staff. She laughed. We had a pleasant conversation and she seemed to understand about the licensing. She also asked about the statement for October. I explained that we (myself, my boss, and accounting) had a meeting on teams to go over the statement. We did get it adjusted and it was mailed to her and to [her daughter and POA]. I further explained what the invoice should reflect and that the statement goes back to the beginning of May 2024 so that they are getting the full picture." -September 26, 2024, a care conference was held to discuss the resident refusing all services aside from nursing evaluations. The "resident has been informed (in detail) that Edgewood May Creek LLC and Edgewood Management Group will no longer be held liable for issues that develop due to refusal of those services listed above." -August 2, 2024, the resident's power of attorney (POA)-B "approached the ED's [executive director's] office with a demand for the services checklist for the month's in question. The ED explained that she has already been provided the service plan and explanation of services. The ED further explained that during the conversations with [the resident], she had agreed that the services provided were accurate and rewrote a check for the accurate statement amount of $7,169.84. [POA-B] stated that her mother had never agreed or authorized the increase in services. She further stated that the reason that she rewrote the check was because she felt badgered to do so. [POA-B] then corrected her statement to say that "she felt pushed". The ED STATE FORM 6899 FXDJ11 If continuation sheet 4 of 12 PRINTED: 10/31/2024 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 30760 10/22/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 303 10TH STREET SOUTH EDGEWOOD MAY CREEK LLC WALKER, MN 56484 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 02350 Continued From page 4 02350 responded that given the light heartedness of the conversation, she had no reason to believe that [the resident] felt pressured in any way. [POA-B] again demanded the policies regarding Edgewood services and the services checklist. [POA-B] stated "I'm not waiting, I want it right now". The ED stated that she was in contact with the RND [regional nursing director] and the RVP [regional vice president] and the was a Pre-Term Care Conference scheduled. The ED also stated that they would not be having the discussion again regarding the authorization, MD [doctor's] orders, or the services checklist. Any and all items in question would be discussed at the scheduled Care Conference. [POA-B] then stated "So, you're going to do this, this is sad. You're going to do this to my mother. This is so sad". -August 1, 2024, POA-B left a note requesting a print out of services provided. "The ED saw the note and proceeded to print off a copy of the service plan for [the resident]. [POA-B] then appeared at the ED's office door. [POA-B] ask if the ED had gotten her note and if the service list was printed. When handed the service plan, [POA-B] stated that it was not what she was asking for. The ED asked her to come into the office to discuss what she was looking for. While trying to explain the changes that dictated the elevation of services and change in service level, [POA-B] repeated that it was never approved. The ED stated that she, the CSD [clinical services director], the BOD [business office director], and [the resident] sat down and went over the reason for the elevation in the service level. [The resident] agreed that it was valid and wrote a check to cover the charges for the elevation in service level. [The resident] had originally wrote a check for $5,525.00 as was her previous statement amount. The updated amount that she STATE FORM 6899 FXDJ11 If continuation sheet 5 of 12 PRINTED: 10/31/2024 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B.
1 older inspection from 2022 are not shown in the free view.
1 older inspection (2022–2023) are available with a premium membership.
Other facilities in Walker.
Other memory care facilities near Walker with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.