Ecumen Sand Prairie.
Ecumen Sand Prairie is Grade A, ranked in the top 1% of Minnesota memory care with no MDH citations on record; last inspected Jan 2025.

A large home, reviewed on public record.
Ranked against 187 Minnesota facilities.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Minnesota Dept. of Health · Health Regulation Division.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Be first to know if Ecumen Sand Prairie's inspection record changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
No citations in the last 36 months.
Finding distribution
none · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Ecumen Sand Prairie's record and state requirements.
The most recent Minnesota Department of Health inspection on January 15, 2025 found zero deficiencies across 2 reports on file — can you walk me through how the community maintains compliance with Minn. Stat. ch. 144G dementia care requirements, and what internal audits or quality checks are in place?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
MDH records show 1 complaint on file — was that complaint substantiated, and can you share the facility's own written response or corrective action plan that was developed in response to that complaint?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
This facility holds an Assisted Living Facility with Dementia Care license under Minn. Stat. ch. 144G — can you provide a copy of the written dementia care program that describes how staff are trained to support residents with cognitive impairment, and how often that training is updated?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every MDH visit, verbatim.
2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-01-15Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection was conducted at this facility from January 13-15, 2025, and state correction orders were issued for violations of Minnesota assisted living statutes. The facility was not assessed immediate fines and must document how it corrected the deficiencies and made changes to prevent future violations, though the specific violations are listed on the attached state form. The facility has the right to request reconsideration of the correction orders within 15 days.
Full inspector notes
correction orders and document the actions taken to comply in the facility's records. The Department reserves the right to return to the facility at any time should the Department receive a complaint or deem it necessary to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of residents in your care. STATE CORRECTION ORDERS The enclosed State Form documents the state correction orders. MDH documents state licensing correction orders using federal software. Tag numbers are assigned to Minnesota state statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state statute number and the corresponding text of the state statute out of compliance are listed in the "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" column. This column also includes the findings that are in violation of the state statute after the statement, "This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by . . ." In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31 Subd. 4, MDH may assess fines based on the level and scope of the violations; h owever, no immediate fines are assessed for this survey of your facility. DOCUMENTATION OF ACTION TO COMPLY In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.30, Subd. 5(c), the licensee must document actions taken to comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. The correction order documentation should include the following: An equal opportunity employer. Letter ID: IS7N REVISED 09/13/2021 Ecumen Sand Prairie February 24, 2025 Page 2 Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected related to the resident(s)/employee(s) identified in the correction order. Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected for all of the provider’s resident(s)/employees that may be affected by the noncompliance. Identify what changes to your systems and practices were made to ensure compliance with the specific statute(s). CORRECTION ORDER RECONSIDERATION PROCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.32, Subd. 2, you may challenge the correction order(s) issued, including the level and scope, and any fine assessed through the correction order reconsideration process. The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. To submit a reconsideration request, please visit: https://forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/HRDAppealsForm The MDH Health Regulation Division (HRD) values your feedback about your experience during the survey and/or investigation process. Please fill out this anonymous provider feedback questionnaire at your convenience at this link: h ttps://forms.office.com/g/Bm5uQEpHVa. Your input is important to us and will enable MDH to improve its processes and communication with providers. If you have any questions regarding the questionnaire, please contact Susan Winkelmann at susan.winkelmann@state.mn.us or call 651-201-5952. You are encouraged to retain this document for your records. It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and state form with your organization’s Governing Body. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jodi Johnson, Supervisor State Evaluation Team Email: Jodi.Johnson@state.mn.us Telephone: 507-344-2730 Fax: 1-866-890-9290 HHH PRINTED: 02/24/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 30768 01/15/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 700 KNIGHT STREET ECUMEN SAND PRAIRIE SAINT PETER, MN 56082 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING Minnesota Department of Health is CORRECTION ORDER(S) documenting the State Correction Orders using federal software. Tag numbers have In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section been assigned to Minnesota State 144G.08 to 144G.95, these correction orders are Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The issued pursuant to a survey. assigned tag number appears in the far-left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The Determination of whether violations are corrected state Statute number and the requires compliance with all requirements corresponding text of the state Statute out provided at the Statute number indicated below. of compliance is listed in the "Summary When Minnesota Statute contains several items, Statement of Deficiencies" column. This failure to comply with any of the items will be column also includes the findings which considered lack of compliance. are in violation of the state requirement after the statement, "This Minnesota INITIAL COMMENTS: requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the evaluators ' findings is the SL30768016-0 Time Period for Correction. On January 13, 2025, through January 15, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF full survey at the above provider. At the time of THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH the survey, there were 36 residents; 30 receiving STATES,"PROVIDER'S PLAN OF services under the Assisted Living Facility with CORRECTION." THIS APPLIES TO Dementia Care license. FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES. THE LETTER IN THE LEFT COLUMN IS USED FOR TRACKING PURPOSES AND REFLECTS THE SCOPE AND LEVEL ISSUED PURSUANT TO 144G.31 SUBDIVISION 1-3. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 QKMN11 If continuation sheet 1 of 13 PRINTED: 02/24/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 30768 01/15/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 700 KNIGHT STREET ECUMEN SAND PRAIRIE SAINT PETER, MN 56082 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 480 Continued From page 1 0 480 0 480 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum 0 480 SS=F requirements; required food services (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. (b) For an assisted living facility with a licensed capacity of ten or fewer residents: (1) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.0033, item A, the facility may share a certified food protection manager (CFPM) with one other facility located within a 60-mile radius and under common management provided the CFPM is present at each facility frequently enough to effectively administer, manage, and supervise each facility's food service operation; (2) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.0545, item A, kick plates that are not removable or cannot be rotated open are allowed unless the facility has been issued repeated correction orders for violations of Minnesota Rules, part 4626.1565 or 4626.1570; (3) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.0685, item A, the facility is not required to provide integral drainboards, utensil racks, or tables large enough to accommodate soiled and clean items that may accumulate during hours of operation provided soiled items do not contaminate clean items, surfaces, or food, and clean equipment and dishes are air dried in a manner that prevents contamination before storage; (4) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.1070, item A, the facility is not required to install a dedicated handwashing sink in its existing kitchen provided it designates one well of a two-compartment sink for use only as a handwashing sink; STATE FORM 6899 QKMN11 If continuation sheet 2 of 13 PRINTED: 02/24/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 30768 01/15/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 700 KNIGHT STREET ECUMEN SAND PRAIRIE SAINT PETER, MN 56082 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 480 Continued From page 2 0 480 (5) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, parts 4626.1325, 4626.1335, and 4626.1360, item A, existing floor, wall, and ceiling finishes are allowed provided the facility keeps them clean and in good condition; (6) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.
2023-07-24Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged the facility neglected a resident by failing to report and follow up after an unwitnessed fall that led to compartment syndrome and a blood clot requiring hospitalization. The Minnesota Department of Health investigated and found the allegation not substantiated, noting that although one caregiver did not immediately report the fall, the facility nurse and the resident's nurse practitioner were informed and assessed the resident within two to three days, and the nurse continued monitoring the resident every three days thereafter until hospitalization. The resident's serious complications appeared two weeks after the fall and were not foreseeable from the initial assessment.
Full inspector notes
Finding: Not Substantiated Nature of the Investigation: The Minnesota Department of Health investigated an allegation of maltreatment, in accordance with the Minnesota Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act, Minn. Stat. 626.557, and to evaluate compliance with applicable licensing standards for the provider type. Initial Investigation Allegation(s): The facility neglected the resident by failing to report and follow-up after the resident fell, which eventually resulted in compartment syndrome (a painful condition when pressure within muscles builds to dangerous levels). Investigative Findings and Conclusion: The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. Although the unlicensed caregiver #1 failed to report the resident’s unwitnessed fall immediately, both the facility nurse and the resident’s nurse practitioner were informed and assessed the resident in the next two-to-three days. Unfortunately, two weeks later, the resident developed compartment syndrome and a deep vein thrombosis (blood clot) which required hospitalization. The investigator conducted interviews with facility staff members, including administrative staff, and unlicensed staff. The investigator contacted the resident's family member. The investigation included review of resident's records, facility's policies and procedures, incident reports, and An equal opportunity employer. the resident's external medical record. The investigation included an onsite visit, observations, and interactions between residents and facility staff. The resident resided in an assisted living. The resident’s diagnoses include osteoarthritis, schizophrenia, and hypertension. The resident’s service plan included assistance of one person with all activities of daily living. The resident’s assessment indicated she needed assistant of one person with transfers and mobility. The incident report indicated the resident was found on the floor one evening after an unwitnessed fall. The same document indicated she had pain and bruising at that time. The facility’s internal investigation indicated the unlicensed caregiver who found the resident did not report the fall immediately, however a co-worker reported it on his behalf and asked the nurse to see the resident. Two days after the fall the resident’s medical record indicated the nurse practitioner saw the resident, who reported the fall and complained of right shoulder pain. The nurse practitioner prescribed ice/heat treatment to the area for 20 minutes three times a day. The resident’s progress notes indicated the nurse assessed the resident three days after the fall and observed dark purple bruising on her right arm but observed full range of motion with minimal swelling and no tenderness. The same document indicated the nurse saw the resident four more times over the next two weeks in which the resident’s symptoms were stable and seemed to be slowly resolving. However, one night the resident reported an increase pain in her right arm and shoulder and so she was sent to the emergency room. The emergency room documents indicated the resident had bruising with compartment syndrome and a deep vein thrombosis in the arm, which required emergency surgery. During an interview, unlicensed caregiver #1 stated he found the resident on the floor in her apartment. After assisting the resident back to bed using a gait belt, he said the resident claimed to be fine and uninjured. However, he did not notify the nurse or the family, though he did inform his co-worker. During an interview, unlicensed caregiver #2 stated she became aware of the incident the following day, promptly filled out an incident report, and notified both the nurse and a family member. The resident complained of pain, and pain medication was administered to provide relief. The nurse frequently assessed the resident, recommending the use of ice packs to reduce swelling and alleviate pain. During an interview, the family member confirmed the resident fell in her recliner, and a staff member assisted her in getting up. The facility informed the family member about the incident two days later. Initially, there seemed to be some improvement, but later the arm's swelling became more pronounced, and it was discovered that the resident had a blood clot. Regrettably, the resident lost movement in her arm and was unable to regain strength. Throughout the two weeks following the incident, the nurse provided updates, frequently assessed the injury, and closely monitored the resident's condition per family member. During an interview, the nurse stated that she began working at the facility three days after the incident occurred. She became aware of the incident through unlicensed caregiver #2. She stated she promptly assessed the resident and continued to do so every three days until the resident's transfer to the hospital. Unlicensed caregiver #1 received corrective action and the facility provided education to all the staff members regarding reporting falls. In conclusion, the Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. “Not Substantiated” means: An investigatory conclusion indicating the preponderance of evidence shows that an act meeting the definition of maltreatment did not occur. Neglect: Minnesota Statutes, section 626.5572, subdivision 17 Neglect means neglect by a caregiver or self-neglect. (a) "Caregiver neglect" means the failure or omission by a caregiver to supply a vulnerable adult with care or services, including but not limited to, food, clothing, shelter, health care, or supervision which is: (1) reasonable and necessary to obtain or maintain the vulnerable adult's physical or mental health or safety, considering the physical and mental capacity or dysfunction of the vulnerable adult; and (2) which is not the result of an accident or therapeutic conduct. Vulnerable Adult interviewed: No, due to memory loss. Family/Responsible Party interviewed: Yes. Alleged Perpetrator interviewed: Not Applicable he Action taken by facility: Corrective action for unlicensed caregiver #1 and facility-wide education on reporting falls Action taken by the Minnesota Department of Health: No further action taken at this time. cc: The Office of Ombudsman for Long Term Care The Office of Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities PRINTED: 07/25/2023 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 30768 06/26/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 700 KNIGHT STREET ECUMEN SAND PRAIRIE SAINT PETER, MN 56082 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 On June 26, 2023, the Minnesota Department of Health initiated an investigation of complaints #HL307684863M/HL307688213C . No correction orders are issued. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 Z5R311 If continuation sheet 1 of 1
Other facilities in St. Peter.
Other memory care facilities near St. Peter with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.