Editorial Independence

StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from any operator. Rankings are derived solely from state inspection records and verified family reviews.

StarlynnCare
Minnesota · Spring Lake Park

Suite Living Senior Care.

Suite Living Senior Care is Grade A, ranked in the top 1% of Minnesota memory care with no MDH citations on record; last inspected Dec 2025.

ALF · Memory Care32 licensed beds · mediumDementia-trained staff
525 Osborne Road · Spring Lake Park, MN 55432LIC# ALRC:2032
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Facility · Spring Lake Park
Suite Living Senior Care
© Google Street Viewoperator? submit a photo →
A 32-bed ALF · Memory Care with no citations on file.
Last inspection · Dec 2025 · cleanSource · MDH
Licensed beds
32
Memory care
✓ Yes
Last inspection
Dec 2025
Last citation
None on record
Operated by
Phone
§ 01 · Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

§ 02 · Peer Comparison

Ranked against 187 Minnesota facilities.

ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Minnesota Dept. of Health · Health Regulation Division.

Severity rank
100th
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
100th
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
peer median
0
100
Frequency rank
100th
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

FACILITY WATCH · BETA

Be first to know if Suite Living Senior Care's inspection record changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

§ 03 · The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

No citations in the last 36 months.

0weighted score · 24 mo
No citation activity in this window.
peer median
Jun 2024May 2026

Finding distribution

none · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

No findings in the last 36 months.
§ 05 · Tour Prep

Questions to ask before you visit.

A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Suite Living Senior Care's record and state requirements.

01 /

The most recent Minnesota Department of Health inspection was conducted on December 5, 2025, and resulted in zero deficiencies — can you walk us through how the facility prepared for that inspection and share any written commendations or notes from MDH?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

02 /

One complaint was filed with the Minnesota Department of Health during the inspection period on file — was that complaint substantiated, and what documentation can you provide about the facility's response and any corrective measures taken?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

03 /

This facility holds an Assisted Living Facility with Dementia Care license under Minnesota Statute Chapter 144G — can you show us the written dementia care program that MDH reviewed during licensure, and explain how staff competency in dementia care is assessed and documented?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

§ 06 · Full Inspection Record

Every MDH visit, verbatim.

3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

3
reports on file
0
total deficiencies
2025-12-05
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

A routine inspection was conducted at Suite Living Senior Care of Spring Lake Park from December 1-3, 2025, and correction orders were issued for violations of Minnesota state statutes; no fines were assessed at this time. The facility must document in its records the actions it takes to correct each violation and how it will prevent similar problems from happening with all residents and staff. The facility has the right to request reconsideration of the correction orders within 15 days if it disagrees with the findings.

Full inspector notes

correction orders and document the actions taken to comply in the facility's records. The Department reserves the right to return to the facility at any time should the Department receive a complaint or deem it necessary to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of residents in your care. STATE CORRECTIO NORDERS The enclosed State Form documents the state correction orders. MDH documents state licensing correction orders using federal software. Tag numbers are assigned to Minnesota state statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state statute number and the corresponding text of the state statute out of compliance are listed in the "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" column. This column also includes the findings that are in violation of the state statute after the statement, "This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by . . ." In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31 Subd. 4, MDH may assess fines based on the level and scope of t he violati ons ; however, no immediate fines are assessed for this survey of your facility. DOCUMENTATIO ONF ACTION TO COMPLY In accorda nce with Min n. Stat. § 144G.30, Sub d. 5(c), th e lic ens ee mus t docum ent ac tions taken t o comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. The correction order documentation should include the following: An equal opportunity employer. Letter ID: IS7N REVISE D09/13/2021 Suite Living Senior Care of Spring Lake Park LLC January 9, 2026 Page 2 Identify how the area( s) of noncompliance was corrected related to the · resident( s)/ employee( s) identified in the correction order. Identify how the area( s) of noncompliance was corrected for all of the provider’s · resident( s)/ employees that may be affected by the noncompliance. Identify what changes to your systems and practices were made to ensure compliance with · the specific statute( s). CORRECTIO NORDER RECONSIDERATIO PNROCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.32, Subd. 2, you may challenge the correction order( s) issued, including the level and scope, and any fine assessed through the correction order reconsideration process. The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. To submit a reconsideration request, please visit: https: / / forms. web. health. state. mn. us/ form/ HRDAppealsForm The MDH Health Regulation Division (HRD )values your feedback about your experience during the survey and/ or investigation process. Please fill out this anonymous provider feedback questionnaire at your conv enien ce at thi s link: https: / / forms. office.com/ g/ Bm5uQEpHVa. Your inpu t is import ant to us and will enable MDH to improve its processes and communication with providers. If you have any questions regarding the questionnaire, please contact Susan Winkelmann at susan. winkelmann@state. mn.us or call 651-201-5952. You are encouraged to retain this document for your records. It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and state form with your organization’s Governing Body. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Kelly Thorson, Supervisor State Evaluation Team Email: KellyT. horson@state. mn.us Telephone: 320-223-7336 Fax: 1-866-890-9290 HHH PRINTED: 01/ 09/ 2026 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/ SUPPLIER/ CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 39404 12/ 05/ 2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 525 OSBORNE ROAD SUITE LIVING SENIOR CARE OF SPRING LAKE PARK LLC SPRING LAKE PARK, MN 55432 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER' S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS- REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 *****ATTENTION***** Minnesota Department of Health is documenting the State Correction Orders ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING using federal software. Tag numbers have CORRECTION ORDER( S) been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section assigned tag number appears in the 144G. 08 to 144G. 95, these correction orders are far-left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag. "The issued pursuant to a survey. state Statute number and the corresponding text of the state Statute out Determination of whether violations are corrected of compliance is listed in the "Summary requires compliance with all requirements Statement of Deficiencies" column. This provided at the Statute number indicated below. column also includes the findings which When Minnesota Statute contains several items, are in violation of the state requirement failure to comply with any of the items will be after the statement, "This Minnesota considered lack of compliance. requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the evaluators ' findings is the INITIAL COMMENTS: Time Period for Correction. SL39404016- 0 PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH On December 1, 2025, through December 3, STATES, "PROVIDER' S PLAN OF 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health CORRECTION. " THIS APPLIES TO conducted a full survey at the above provider and FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS the following correction orders are issued. At the WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. time of the survey, there were 28 residents; 28 receiving services under the Assisted Living THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO Facility with Dementia Care license. SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES. THE LETTER IN THE LEFT COLUMN IS USED FOR TRACKING PURPOSES AND REFLECTS THE SCOPE AND LEVEL ISSUED PURSUANT TO 144G. 31 SUBDIVISION 1-3. 0 485 144G. 41 Subdivision 1.a (a) Minimum 0 485 SS= C requirements; required food services LABORATORY DIRECTOR' S OR PROVIDER/ SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE' S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 3B6911 If continuation sheet 1 of 18 PRINTED: 01/ 09/ 2026 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/ SUPPLIER/ CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 39404 12/ 05/ 2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 525 OSBORNE ROAD SUITE LIVING SENIOR CARE OF SPRING LAKE PARK LLC SPRING LAKE PARK, MN 55432 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER' S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS- REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 485 Continued From page 1 0 485 (a) All assisted living facilities must offer to provide or make available at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) guidelines, including seasonal fresh fruit and fresh vegetables. The menus must be prepared at least one week in advance and made available to all residents. The facility must encourage residents' involvement in menu planning. Meal substitutions must be of similar nutritional value if a resident refuses a food that is served. Residents must be informed in advance of menu changes. The facility must not require a resident to include and pay for meals in the resident' s contract. This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not require any resident to include and pay for meals as a part of their assisted living contract. This had the potential to affect all residents. This practice resulted in a level one violation (a violation that will cause only minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents) . The findings include: During the entrance conference on December 1, 2025, at 10: 10 a. m., licensed assisted living STATE FORM 6899 3B6911 If continuation sheet 2 of 18 PRINTED: 01/ 09/ 2026 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/ SUPPLIER/ CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B.

2025-11-06
Complaint Investigation
No findings

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that a resident's neglect allegation was not substantiated; staff reported the resident's declining health condition to nurses and family over four days, monitored the resident every two hours, and the family requested the resident be transported to the hospital where the resident died while receiving comfort care. The investigation reviewed medical records, facility policies, and interviewed staff and the resident's hospice nurse, confirming that staff appropriately communicated changes in the resident's condition and followed the family's wishes regarding hospital transfer.

Full inspector notes

Finding: Not Substantiated Nature of Investigation: The Minnesota Department of Health investigated an allegation of maltreatment, in accordance with the Minnesota Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act, Minn. Stat. 626.557, and to evaluate compliance with applicable licensing standards for the provider type. Initial Investigation Allegation(s): The resident was neglected when the resident had a decline in health, passed away four days later and family was not notified. Investigative Findings and Conclusion: The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. Staff reported the resident’s change in condition to facility nurses, hospice nurses, facility staff monitored the resident, and the hospice nurse assessed the resident. The resident’s family was contacted regarding the resident’s declining condition and the family requested the resident be transported to the hospital where the resident died while on comfort care. The investigator conducted interviews with facility staff members, including administrative staff, nursing staff, and unlicensed staff. The investigator contacted the resident’s hospice nurse. The investigation included review of the resident record(s), death record, hospital records, facility incident reports, personnel files, staff schedules, related facility policy and procedures. Also, the investigator observed the facility’s physical plant, medication administrations and staff interaction during cares. The resident resided in an assisted living facility. The resident’s diagnoses included Alzheimer’s Disease [a progressive disease that causes confusion, memory loss and other cognitive declines]. The resident’s service plan included assistance with activities of daily living such as dressing, toileting, medication management and safety checks every two hours. The resident’s assessment indicated the resident received hospice services, had mild disorientation and judgement deficits. Medical records indicated the resident’s hospice massage therapist reported the resident’s upper respiratory symptoms to the facility nurse, who assessed the resident and observed the resident to have a cough, chills, runny nose and low-grade fever. The facility nurse then updated the resident’s provider and completed a Rapid COVID-19 test which was negative. The facility nurse also updated the hospice nurse. Later this same day, the resident had a fall that was without injury and staff reported the fall to the facility’s on-call nurse. Staff monitored the resident for pain, injury and vital signs for the following two days. Medical records indicated on the next day, the resident had increased weakness, fatigue, decreased appetite and was pale. Staff updated the on-call facility nurse and the hospice nurse, who assessed the resident the same day. Staff continued to monitor the resident every two hours and obtain the resident’s vital signs. Medical records indicated the next day, staff reported to the on-call nurse and the hospice nurse, that the resident experienced diarrhea and dizziness. Later this same day, the resident became unresponsive, had low blood pressure and had low oxygen saturation levels [measures oxygen in the blood]. Staff reported the symptoms to the hospice nurse, who contacted the resident’s family. The resident’s family requested to have the resident sent to the hospital for evaluation. Hospital Medical Records indicated the resident was admitted to the hospital and placed on comfort care; the resident died four days after the onset of the symptoms. During an interview, an on-call nurse stated staff reported the resident had a fall at the on-set of the changes in condition and staff monitored the resident for injuries and further change in condition until the resident was transported to the hospital. During an interview, the resident’s hospice nurse, stated a hospice nurse assessed the resident the day after the onset of the upper respiratory symptoms and there were no changes to the resident’s goals of care on that day. During an interview, an administrative nurse stated the resident’s upper respiratory symptoms were reported by the resident’s hospice nurse. The administrative nurse stated she updated staff and the resident’s hospice nurse regarding an ordered COVID-19 test that was negative as well as updated staff to monitor the resident for further symptoms, push fluids, and administer Tylenol as needed via an electric health records message system. During an interview, the resident’s family member stated that although staff did not notify of the resident’s COVID-19 test results, staff and the resident’s hospice nurse updated the family member regarding the resident’s change in condition and fall over the four days the resident was observed to decline. The family member recalled facility staff and the resident’s hospice nurse followed family request to transport the resident to the hospital after the resident’s oxygen saturation levels were low. In conclusion, the Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. “Not Substantiated” means: An investigatory conclusion indicating the preponderance of evidence shows that an act meeting the definition of maltreatment did not occur. Neglect: Minnesota Statutes, section 626.5572, subdivision 17 “Neglect” means neglect by a caregiver or self-neglect. (a) "Caregiver neglect" means the failure or omission by a caregiver to supply a vulnerable adult with care or services, including but not limited to, food, clothing, shelter, health care, or supervision which is: (1) reasonable and necessary to obtain or maintain the vulnerable adult's physical or mental health or safety, considering the physical and mental capacity or dysfunction of the vulnerable adult; and (2) which is not the result of an accident or therapeutic conduct. Insert maltreatment definition here. Vulnerable Adult interviewed: No. The resident was deceased. Family/Responsible Party interviewed: Yes Alleged Perpetrator interviewed: Not Applicable he Action taken by facility: Facility staff reported and assessed the resident’s change in condition. Facility staff reported incidences to facility nursing and the resident’s hospice nurse. Facility staff transported the resident to the hospital for evaluation. Action taken by the Minnesota Department of Health: No further action taken at this time. cc: The Office of Ombudsman for Long Term Care The Office of Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities PRINTED: 11/14/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 39404 09/30/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 525 OSBORNE ROAD SUITE LIVING SENIOR CARE OF SPRING LAKE SPRING LAKE PARK, MN 55432 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE PREFIX PREFIX REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 On September 30, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health initiated an investigation of complaint #HL394043145C/#HL394045602M. No correction orders are issued. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 PV9W11 If continuation sheet 1 of 1

2023-09-15
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

A routine inspection of this assisted living facility with dementia care was conducted on September 15, 2023, and one correction order was issued for an infection control program deficiency, with a $500 fine assessed. The facility must document how it corrected the infection control issue for the specific residents involved and implement changes to prevent the problem from recurring across all residents.

Full inspector notes

CORRECTION ORDERS The enclosed State Form documents the state correction orders. The Department of Health documents state correction orders using federal software. Tag numbers are assigned to Minnesota state statutes for Home Care Providers. The assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state statute number and the corresponding text of the state statute out of compliance are listed in the "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" column. This column also includes the findings that are in violation of the state statute after the statement, "This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by . . ." IMPOSITION OF FINES In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31, Subd. 4, fines and enforcement actions may be imposed based on the level and scope of the violations and imposed immediately with no opportunity to correct the violation first as follows: Level 1: no fines or enforcement. Level 2: a fine of $500 per violation, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20 for widespread violations; Level 3: a fine of $3,000 per violation per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20. Level 4: a fine of $5,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in An equal opportunity employer. Letter ID: 9GJX Revise d04/20/2023 Suite Living Senior Care of Spring Lake Park LLC October 19, 2023 Page 2 § 144G.20. In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.20, Subd. 4(a)(5), the Department of Health imposes fine amounts of either $1,000 or $5,000 to licensees who are found to be responsible for maltreatment. The Department of Health imposes a fine of $1,000 for each substantiated maltreatment violation that consists of abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation according to Minn. Stat. § 626.5572. Subds. 2, 9, 17. The Department of Health also may impose a fine of $5,000 for each substantiated maltreatment violation consisting of sexual assault, death, or abuse resulting in serious injury. In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31, Subd. 4(a)(5)(b), when a fine is assessed against a facility for substantiated maltreatment, the commissioner shall not also impose an immediate fine under this chapter for the same circumstance. Therefore, in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 144G.01 to 144G.9999, the following fines are assessed pursuant to this survey: St - 0 - 0510 - 144g.41 Subd. 3 - Infection Control Program - $500.00 The total amount you are assessed is $500.00. You will be invoiced approximately 30 days after receipt of this notice, subject to appeal. DOCUMENTATION OF ACTION TO COMPLY Per Minn. Stat. § 144G.30, Subd. 5(c), the licensee must document actions taken to comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. The correction order documentation should include the following: Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected related to the resident(s)/employee(s) identified in the correction order. Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected for all of the provider’s residents/employees that may be affected by the noncompliance. Identify what changes to your systems and practices were made to ensure compliance with the specific statute(s). CORRECTION ORDER RECONSIDERATION PROCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.32, Subd. 2, you may challenge the correction order issued, including the level and scope, and any fine assessed through the correction order reconsideration process. The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by the Department of Health within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. A state correction order under Minn. Stat. § 144G.91, Subd. 8, Free from Maltreatment is associated with a maltreatment determination by the Office of Health Facility Complaints. If maltreatment is substantiated, you will receive a separate letter with the reconsideration process under Minn. Stat. § Suite Living Senior Care of Spring Lake Park LLC October 19, 2023 Page 3 626.557. Please email reconsideration requests to: Health.HRD.Appeals@state.mn.us. Please attach this letter as part of your reconsideration request. Please clearly indicate which tag(s) you are contesting and submit information supporting your position(s). Please address your cover letter for reconsideration requests to: Reconsideration Unit 85 East Seventh Place St. Paul, MN 55164-0970 REQUESTING A HEARING Alternatively, in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31, Subd. 5(d), an assisted living provider that has been assessed a fine under this subdivision has a right to a reconsideration or a hearing under this section and chapter 14. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 144G.20, Subd. 14 and Subd. 18, a request for a hearing must be in writing and received by the Department of Health within 15 business days of the correction order receipt date. The request must contain a brief and plain statement describing each matter or issue contested and any new information you believe constitutes a defense or mitigating factor. Requests for hearing may be emailed to: H ealth.HRD.Appeals@state.mn.us. To appeal fines via reconsideration, please follow the procedure outlined above. P lease note that you may request a reconsideration or a hearing, but not both. You are encouraged to retain this document for your records. It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and/or state form with your organization’s Governing Body. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jess Schoenecker, Supervisor State Evaluation Team Email: jess.schoenecker@state.mn.us Telephone: 651-201-3789 Fax: 1-866-890-9290 HHH PRINTED: 10/19/2023 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 39404 09/15/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 525 OSBORNE ROAD SUITE LIVING SENIOR CARE OF SPRING LAKE SPRING LAKE PARK, MN 55432 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 ******ATTENTION****** Minnesota Department of Health is documenting the State Licensing ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING Correction Orders using federal software. CORRECTION ORDER(S) Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section Living License Providers. The assigned 144G.08 to 144G.95, these correction orders are tag number appears in the far left column issued pursuant to a survey. entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state Statute number and the corresponding text of the Determination of whether violations are corrected state Statute out of compliance is listed in requires compliance with all requirements the "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" provided at the Statute number indicated below. column. This column also includes the When Minnesota Statute contains several items, findings which are in violation of the state failure to comply with any of the items will be requirement after the statement, "This considered lack of compliance. Minnesota requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the surveyors' INITIAL COMMENTS: findings is the Time Period for Correction. SL39404015 PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF On September 11, 2023, through September 14, THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH 2023, the Minnesota Department of Health STATES,"PROVIDER'S PLAN OF conducted a survey at the above provider, and CORRECTION." THIS APPLIES TO the following correction orders are issued. At the FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS time of the survey, there were 21 active residents WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. whom were receiving services under the Assisted Living with Dementia Care license. THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES. The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3. 0 480 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum 0 480 SS=F requirements (13) offer to provide or make available at least the LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 146411 If continuation sheet 1 of 46 PRINTED: 10/19/2023 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.