Minnesota · Red Wing

Deer Crest Senior Living.

ALF · Memory Care85 bedsDementia-trained staff
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Peer rank
Top 1% of Minnesota memory care
See full peer rank →
Facility · Red Wing
A 85-bed ALF · Memory Care with no citations on file.
Licensed beds
85
Last inspection
Dec 2024
Last citation
None on record
Operated by
Phone
Snapshot

A large home, reviewed on public record.

Peer Comparison

Compared to 143 Minnesota facilities with a similar number of beds.

ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Minnesota Dept. of Health · Health Regulation Division.

Severity rank
100th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
100th%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month MDH inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

FACILITY WATCH · FREE

Be first to know if Deer Crest Senior Living's inspection record changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

Where are you in the process? (optional)

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

No citations in the last 36 months.

Peer median 1 · dashed
No citation activity in this window.
peer median
Aug 2024as of Jul 2026

Finding distribution

none · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

No findings in the last 36 months.
Tour Prep

Questions to ask before you visit.

A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Deer Crest Senior Living's record and state requirements.

01 /

The most recent Minnesota Department of Health inspection on December 11, 2024 resulted in zero deficiencies across all areas — can you walk us through the internal quality-assurance processes you use to maintain compliance with Minnesota Statute Chapter 144G dementia care requirements between state visits?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

02 /

Two complaints were filed with the Minnesota Department of Health during the inspection period on file — can you describe the nature of those complaints, whether they were substantiated, and what corrective measures the facility implemented in response?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

03 /

As a licensed Assisted Living Facility with Dementia Care under Minnesota Statute Chapter 144G, what written dementia care policies and staff training documentation can you show families on a tour to demonstrate how the 85-bed building supports residents with cognitive impairment?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

3
reports on file
0
total deficiencies
2026-05-06
Complaint Investigation
No findings
2024-12-11
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

A standard licensing survey was conducted at Deer Crest Senior Living on December 9–11, 2024, and state correction orders were issued. The facility must document actions taken to correct violations of Minnesota statutes related to food services and other requirements, with no immediate fines assessed for this survey. The facility has a specified time period to correct the deficiencies and may request reconsideration of the correction orders within 15 calendar days if desired.

Read raw inspector notes

correction orders and document the actions taken to comply in the facility's records. The Department reserves the right to return to the facility at any time should the Department receive a complaint or deem it necessary to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of residents in your care. STATE CORRECTION ORDERS The enclosed State Form documents the state correction orders. MDH documents state licensing correction orders using federal software. Tag numbers are assigned to Minnesota state statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state statute number and the corresponding text of the state statute out of compliance are listed in the "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" column. This column also includes the findings that are in violation of the state statute after the statement, "This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by . . ." In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31 Subd. 4, MDH may assess fines based on the level and scope of the violations; h owever, no immediate fines are assessed for this survey of your facility. DOCUMENTATION OF ACTION TO COMPLY In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.30, Subd. 5(c), the licensee must document actions taken to comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. The correction order documentation should include the following: An equal opportunity employer. Letter ID: IS7N REVISED 09/13/2021 Deer Crest Senior Living January 27, 2025 Page 2 Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected related to the resident(s)/employee(s) identified in the correction order. Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected for all of the provider’s resident(s)/employees that may be affected by the noncompliance. Identify what changes to your systems and practices were made to ensure compliance with the specific statute(s). CORRECTION ORDER RECONSIDERATION PROCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.32, Subd. 2, you may challenge the correction order(s) issued, including the level and scope, and any fine assessed through the correction order reconsideration process. The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. To submit a reconsideration request, please visit: https://forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/HRDAppealsForm The MDH Health Regulation Division (HRD) values your feedback about your experience during the survey and/or investigation process. Please fill out this anonymous provider feedback questionnaire at your convenience at this link: h ttps://forms.office.com/g/Bm5uQEpHVa. Your input is important to us and will enable MDH to improve its processes and communication with providers. If you have any questions regarding the questionnaire, please contact Susan Winkelmann at susan.winkelmann@state.mn.us or call 651-201-5952. You are encouraged to retain this document for your records. It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and state form with your organization’s Governing Body. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jodi Johnson, Supervisor State Evaluation Team Email: jodi.johnson@state.mn.us Telephone: 507-344-2730 Fax: 1 -866-890-9290 JMD PRINTED: 01/27/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 30636 12/11/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 470 HEWITT BOULEVARD DEER CREST SENIOR LIVING RED WING, MN 55066 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING Minnesota Department of Health is CORRECTION ORDER(S) documenting the State Correction Orders using federal software. Tag numbers have In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section been assigned to Minnesota State 144G.08 to 144G.95, these correction orders are Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The issued pursuant to a survey. assigned tag number appears in the far-left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The Determination of whether violations are corrected state Statute number and the requires compliance with all requirements corresponding text of the state Statute out provided at the Statute number indicated below. of compliance is listed in the "Summary When Minnesota Statute contains several items, Statement of Deficiencies" column. This failure to comply with any of the items will be column also includes the findings which considered lack of compliance. are in violation of the state requirement after the statement, "This Minnesota INITIAL COMMENTS: requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the evaluators ' findings is the SL30636016-0 Time Period for Correction. On December 9, 2024, through December 11, PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF 2024, the Minnesota Department of Health THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH conducted a full survey at the above provider. At STATES,"PROVIDER'S PLAN OF the time of the survey, there were 77 residents; CORRECTION." THIS APPLIES TO 58 receiving services under the Assisted Living FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS Facility with Dementia Care license. WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES. THE LETTER IN THE LEFT COLUMN IS USED FOR TRACKING PURPOSES AND REFLECTS THE SCOPE AND LEVEL ISSUED PURSUANT TO 144G.31 SUBDIVISION 1-3. 0 480 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum 0 480 SS=F requirements; required food services LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 FVKV11 If continuation sheet 1 of 19 PRINTED: 01/27/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 30636 12/11/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 470 HEWITT BOULEVARD DEER CREST SENIOR LIVING RED WING, MN 55066 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 480 Continued From page 1 0 480 (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. (b) For an assisted living facility with a licensed capacity of ten or fewer residents: (1) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.0033, item A, the facility may share a certified food protection manager (CFPM) with one other facility located within a 60-mile radius and under common management provided the CFPM is present at each facility frequently enough to effectively administer, manage, and supervise each facility's food service operation; (2) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.0545, item A, kick plates that are not removable or cannot be rotated open are allowed unless the facility has been issued repeated correction orders for violations of Minnesota Rules, part 4626.1565 or 4626.1570; (3) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.0685, item A, the facility is not required to provide integral drainboards, utensil racks, or tables large enough to accommodate soiled and clean items that may accumulate during hours of operation provided soiled items do not contaminate clean items, surfaces, or food, and clean equipment and dishes are air dried in a manner that prevents contamination before storage; (4) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.1070, item A, the facility is not required to install a dedicated handwashing sink in its existing kitchen provided it designates one well of a two-compartment sink for use only as a handwashing sink; (5) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, parts 4626.1325, 4626.1335, and 4626.1360, item A, existing floor, wall, and ceiling finishes are STATE FORM 6899 FVKV11 If continuation sheet 2 of 19 PRINTED: 01/27/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 30636 12/11/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 470 HEWITT BOULEVARD DEER CREST SENIOR LIVING RED WING, MN 55066 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 480 Continued From page 2 0 480 allowed provided the facility keeps them clean and in good condition; (6) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.

2024-11-08
Complaint Investigation
No findings

Plain-language summary

The Minnesota Department of Health investigated a complaint that an unlicensed caregiver financially exploited a resident by diverting opioid medications, but determined the allegation was inconclusive because there was insufficient evidence to prove the alleged caregiver took the medications, given that tape was found on the narcotic medication card for up to four days and multiple staff members had access during that time. The facility conducted its own investigation, terminated the alleged caregiver's employment, and provided education to staff on medication storage procedures.

Read raw inspector notes

Finding: Inconclusive Nature of Investigation: The Minnesota Department of Health investigated an allegation of maltreatment, in accordance with the Minnesota Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act, Minn. Stat. 626.557, and to evaluate compliance with applicable licensing standards for the provider type. Initial Investigation Allegation(s): The alleged perpetrator, an unlicensed caregiver, financially exploited the resident when opioid medications were missing from the resident’s supply. Investigative Findings and Conclusion: The Minnesota Department of Health determined financial exploitation was inconclusive. The investigation indicated tape was present on the narcotic medication card and a different medication was taped in spaces on the narcotic card, however, it was inconclusive that the alleged perpetrator was the specific person who diverted the narcotic medication. The length of time the tape was reportedly on the back of the narcotic card increased the number of individuals who may have switched out the narcotics. The investigator conducted interviews with facility staff members, including administrative staff, nursing staff, and unlicensed staff. The investigator contacted the resident’s family member. The investigation included review of the resident record(s), facility internal investigation, facility incident reports, personnel files, staff schedules, law enforcement report, and related facility policy and procedures. Also, the investigator observed staff to resident interactions and narcotic count in facility. The resident resided in an assisted living memory care unit. The resident’s diagnoses included Alzheimer’s disease and a fractured left radius (bone in wrist area). The resident’s assessment indicated the resident had both short- and long-term memory impairment and required the assistance of one unlicensed caregiver for transfers from bed to wheelchair. The resident’s service plan included assistance with transfers, assistance with placing to a brace and sling to her left arm, and medication administration. The resident was experiencing pain in her left arm after a fall with fracture; the pain was managed with narcotic medications administered by unlicensed caregivers. The facility internal investigation indicated a concern was reported to facility nurse #1 regarding tape which was found on the back of the resident’s narcotic medication card. Nurse #1 later discovered the medications taped in the narcotic card spaces were not the prescribed narcotic medication but had been switched out for a different medication raising the concern someone had taken the resident’s narcotics. Upon reviewing the security video, the managers found that the alleged perpetrator had suspicious behavior viewed on the video. However, the only video footage was dated on the day the staff member(s) reported the tape on the narcotic card to the facility nurses. The internal investigation included notes from interviews. Those interview notes indicated staff members accounts said the tape had been present for up to 4 days on the narcotic medication card before it was brought to the attention of managers and nursing staff. During investigative interviews, multiple unlicensed caregivers reported they noticed tape on the narcotic medication card several days before it was reported to the nursing staff but did not report the incident because the narcotic count was correct. During an interview, the alleged perpetrator stated she reported the tape on the narcotic medication card to a nurse [a nurse other than nurse #1] who verified the narcotic count was correct. The alleged perpetrator stated she did view the security video footage dated the same day the incident was reported to the facility nurses. She stated she did place tape on the medication card to reinforce the tape that was already present. She also stated she did not take the narcotic medication. In conclusion, the Minnesota Department of Health determined financial exploitation was inconclusive. Inconclusive: Minnesota Statutes, section 626.5572, Subdivision 11. "Inconclusive" means there is less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur. Financial exploitation: Minnesota Statutes, section 626.5572, subdivision 9 (a) In breach of a fiduciary obligation recognized elsewhere in law, including pertinent regulations, contractual obligations, documented consent by a competent person, or the obligations of a responsible party under section 144.6501, a person: (1) engages in unauthorized expenditure of funds entrusted to the actor by the vulnerable adult which results or is likely to result in detriment to the vulnerable adult; or (2) fails to use the financial resources of the vulnerable adult to provide food, clothing, shelter, health care, therapeutic conduct or supervision for the vulnerable adult, and the failure results or is likely to result in detriment to the vulnerable adult. (b) In the absence of legal authority, a person: (1) willfully uses, withholds, or disposes of funds or property of a vulnerable adult; (2) obtains for the actor or another the performance of services by a third person for the wrongful profit or advantage of the actor or another to the detriment of the vulnerable adult; (3) acquires possession or control of, or an interest in, funds or property of a vulnerable adult through the use of undue influence, harassment, duress, deception, or fraud; or (4) forces, compels, coerces, or entices a vulnerable adult against the vulnerable adult's will to perform services for the profit or advantage of another. Vulnerable Adult interviewed: No, cognitively impaired Family/Responsible Party interviewed: Yes Alleged Perpetrator interviewed: Yes Action taken by facility: The facility completed an internal investigation and alleged perpetrator is no longer employed at facility. The facility reviewed its procedure for medication storage and provided education for unlicensed caregivers to report irregularities such as this right away. Action taken by the Minnesota Department of Health: No further action taken at this time. cc: The Office of Ombudsman for Long Term Care The Office of Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities PRINTED: 11/13/2024 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 30636 10/15/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 470 HEWITT BOULEVARD DEER CREST SENIOR LIVING RED WING, MN 55066 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 On October 15, 2024, the Minnesota Department of Health initiated an investigation of complaint #HL306367544C/#HL306365426M. No correction orders are issued. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 ACD711 If continuation sheet 1 of 1

1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.

Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.

Nearby

Other facilities in Red Wing.

Other memory care facilities near Red Wing with similar care offerings.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.
Editorial Independence

The memory care site on the family's side: StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from facilities.