Editorial Independence

StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from any operator. Rankings are derived solely from state inspection records and verified family reviews.

StarlynnCare
Minnesota · Norwood Youngamerica

The Harbor at Peace Village.

The Harbor at Peace Village is Grade A, ranked in the top 1% of Minnesota memory care with no MDH citations on record; last inspected Oct 2025.

ALF · Memory Care41 licensed beds · mediumDementia-trained staff
300 Faxon Road North · Norwood Youngamerica, MN 55368LIC# ALRC:360
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Facility · Norwood Youngamerica
A 41-bed ALF · Memory Care with no citations on file.
Last inspection · Oct 2025 · cleanSource · MDH
Licensed beds
41
Memory care
✓ Yes
Last inspection
Oct 2025
Last citation
None on record
Operated by
Phone
§ 01 · Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

§ 02 · Peer Comparison

Ranked against 187 Minnesota facilities.

ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Minnesota Dept. of Health · Health Regulation Division.

Severity rank
100th
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
100th
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
peer median
0
100
Frequency rank
100th
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

FACILITY WATCH · BETA

Be first to know if The Harbor at Peace Village's inspection record changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

§ 03 · The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

No citations in the last 36 months.

0weighted score · 24 mo
No citation activity in this window.
peer median
Jun 2024May 2026

Finding distribution

none · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

No findings in the last 36 months.
§ 05 · Tour Prep

Questions to ask before you visit.

A short pre-tour checklist tailored to The Harbor at Peace Village's record and state requirements.

01 /

Minnesota Department of Health records show one complaint on file — can you share whether that complaint was substantiated, and if so, what corrective actions the facility implemented in response?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

02 /

The most recent MDH inspection on October 22, 2025 found zero deficiencies — can you walk us through how the facility prepares for unannounced surveys and maintains compliance with Minnesota's assisted living and dementia care standards?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

03 /

As a licensed Assisted Living Facility with Dementia Care under Minnesota Statute Chapter 144G, what written policies govern your dementia care program, and can families review those policies during the tour?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

§ 06 · Full Inspection Record

Every MDH visit, verbatim.

3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

3
reports on file
0
total deficiencies
2025-10-22
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

A standard inspection of The Harbor at Peace Village was completed on October 22, 2025, and found a violation of Minnesota background study requirements under state statute 144G.60 Subdivision 1. The facility was assessed a fine of $1,000.00 for this violation and must document the actions taken to correct the deficiency within the required timeframe.

Full inspector notes

correction orders. MDH documents state licensing correction orders using federal software. Tag numbers are assigned to Minnesota state statutes for Assisted Living Facilities .The assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag". The state statute number and the corresponding text of the state statute out of compliance are listed in the "Summary Statemen tof Deficiencies "column. This column also includes the findings that are in violation of the state statute after the statement, "This MN Requiremen tis not met as evidenced by . . ." IMPOSITION OF FINES In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G3. 1, Subd .4, fines and enforcement actions may be imposed based on the level and scope of the violations and may be imposed immediately with no opportunity to correct the violation first as follows: Leve l1: no fines or enforcement; Leve l2: a fine of $500 per violation, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G2. 0; Leve l3: a fine of $1,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G2. 0; Leve l4: a fine of $3,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G2. 0; Leve l5: a fine of $5,000 per violation, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G2. 0. Therefore ,in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 144G0. 1 to 144G9. 999, the following fines are assessed An equal opportunity employer . Letter ID: IS7N REVISE 0D9/13/2021 The Harbor at Peace Village Novembe r5, 2025 Page 2 pursuant to this survey: St - 0 - 1290 - 144g.60 Subdivision 1 - Background Studies Required - $1,000.00 Therefore ,in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 144G0. 1 to 144G9. 999, the total amount you are assesse dis $1,000.00. You will be invoiced approximately 30 days after receipt of this notice, subject . to appeal DOCUMENTATIO ONF ACTION TO COMPLY In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G3. 0, Subd .5(c), the licensee must docum ent actions taken to comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. The correction order documentation should include the following: x Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected related to the resident(s)/ employees( ) identified in the correction order. x Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected for all of the provider’s resident(s)/ employees that may be affected by the noncompliance. x Identify what changes to your systems and practices were made to ensure compliance with the specific statute(s). CORRECTIO ONRDER RECONSIDERATI OPRNOCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G3. 2, Subd .2, you may challenge the correction order(s) issued, including the level and scope ,and any fine assesse dthrough the correction order reconsideration process .The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. To submit a reconsideration request, please visit: https:/ / forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/ HRDAppealsForm REQUESTIN AG HEARING Alternatively ,in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G3. 1, Subd .5(d), an assisted living provider that has been assesse da fine under this subdivision has a right to a reconsideration or a hearing under this section and chapter 14. Pursuan tto Minn. Stat. § 144G2. 0, Subd .14 and Subd .18, a request for a hearing must be in writing and received by the Department of Health within 15 business days of the correction order receipt date. The request must contain a brief and plain statement describing each matter or issue contested and any new information you believe constitutes a defense or mitigating factor. To submit a hearing request, please visit: https:/ / forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/ HRDAppealsForm To appea lfines via reconside ration, please follow the pr ocedur e outlined above. Plea se note that you may request a reconsideration or a hearing, but not both. If you wish to contest tags without fines in The Harbor at Peace Village Novembe r5, 2025 Page 3 a reconsideration and tags with the fines at a hearing, please submit two separate appeals forms at the website listed above. The MDH Health Regulation Division (HRD )values your feedback about your experience during the survey and/or investigation process .Please fill out this anonymous provider feedback questionnaire at your convenience at this link: https:/ / forms.office.com/g/ Bm5uQEpHV.a Your input is important to us and will enable MDH to improve its processe sand communication with providers . If you have any questions regarding the questionnaire ,please contact Susan Winkelmann at susanw. inkelmann@state.mn.us or call 651-201-5952. You are encouraged to retain this document for your records . It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and state form with your organizations’ Governing Body. If you have any questions ,please contact me. Sincerely, Kelly Thorson ,Supervisor State Evaluation Team Email: Kelly.Thorson@state.mn.us Telephone :320-223-7336 Fax :1-866-890-9290 CLN PRINTED: 11/05/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 28522 10/22/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 300 FAXON ROAD NORTH THE HARBOR AT PEACE VILLAGE NORWOOD YOUNG AMERIC, MN 55368 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE PREFIX PREFIX REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 *****ATTENTION***** Minnesota Department of Health is documenting the State Licensing ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING Correction Orders using federal software. CORRECTION ORDER(S) Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section Living License Providers. The assigned 144G.08 to 144G.95, these correction orders are tag number appears in the far-left column issued pursuant to a survey. entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state Statute number and the corresponding text of the Determination of whether violations are corrected state Statute out of compliance is listed in requires compliance with all requirements the "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" provided at the Statute number indicated below. column. This column also includes the When Minnesota Statute contains several items, findings which are in violation of the state failure to comply with any of the items will be requirement after the statement, "This considered lack of compliance. Minnesota requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the surveyors' INITIAL COMMENTS: findings is the Time Period for Correction. SL285822016 PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH On October 20, 2025, through October 22, 2025, STATES,"PROVIDER'S PLAN OF the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a CORRECTION." THIS APPLIES TO full survey at the above provider and the FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS following correction orders are issued. At the time WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. of the survey, there were 35 residents; 28 receiving services under the Assisted Living THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO Facility license. SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES. The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3. 0 110 144G.10 Subdivision 1a Assisted living director 0 110 SS=C license required LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 WWJJ11 If continuation sheet 1 of 15 PRINTED: 11/05/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 28522 10/22/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 300 FAXON ROAD NORTH THE HARBOR AT PEACE VILLAGE NORWOOD YOUNG AMERIC, MN 55368 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE PREFIX PREFIX REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 110 Continued From page 1 0 110 Each assisted living facility must employ an assisted living director who is licensed or permitted by the Board of Executives for Long Term Services and Supports and affiliated as the director of record with the board. This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the licensed assisted living director (LALD) was listed as the Director of Record for the licensee.

2025-02-07
Complaint Investigation
No findings

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that a resident who tested positive for fentanyl in the emergency room and received Narcan was not neglected by the facility. The facility did not administer fentanyl, had none in its medical supplies, and no residents had prescriptions for it; the source of the fentanyl in the resident's system could not be determined. The Minnesota Department of Health took no further action.

Full inspector notes

Finding: Not Substantiated Nature of Investigation: The Minnesota Department of Health investigated an allegation of maltreatment, in accordance with the Minnesota Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act, Minn. Stat. 626.557, and to evaluate compliance with applicable licensing standards for the provider type. Initial Investigation Allegation(s): The facility neglected the resident when she was found confused and sent to the emergency room (ER), where she tested positive for fentanyl and was administered Narcan. Investigative Findings and Conclusion: The Minnesota Department of Health determined that neglect was not substantiated. Although the resident was found to have fentanyl in her system, there was no evidence indicating the facility gave nor administered fentanyl. No residents at the facility had a prescription for fentanyl and the facility had none in its medical supplies. The investigator conducted interviews with facility staff members, including administrative staff, and unlicensed staff. The investigation included review of the resident’s records, internal investigation documentation, incident reports, staff schedules, policies, and procedures. The resident resided in an assisted living secured memory care building. The resident’s diagnoses include cognitive impairment and chronic low back pain. The resident’s service plan included medication management. On a Monday, the progress notes indicated the resident experienced increased confusion and complained of frequent and urgent urination. The facility contacted the physician, who ordered a urinalysis (UA) with a reflex culture (UC). Two days later, the results came back and indicating a possible infection, and the physician prescribed Macrobid (an antibiotic) by mouth twice a day for seven days. On Thursday, the progress notes indicated that the resident was sent to the emergency room (ER) due to increasing lower back pain following an unwitnessed fall. The hospital records indicated that the resident initially presented with complaints of back pain but was later found to be confused in the ER and subsequently developed a fever. She appeared drowsy but was arousable. A routine urine drug screen was conducted, which tested positive for fentanyl. The hospital checked the resident for a fentanyl patch, but none was found. Fentanyl was not listed in her prescribed medications, nor was she administered any by paramedics. As a precaution and given these findings, the hospital administered a dose of Narcan. The hospital records also indicated Macrobid could have contributed to her confusion. During an interview, a manager, who was also nurse, stated the resident experienced a fall and was very confused when the lift assist team arrived to help her up. The manager stated the resident was unable to explain what had happened. Due to what appeared to be a change in her condition the resident was transported to the emergency room (ER). In the ER, a nurse reported that the resident tested positive for fentanyl. The manager initiated an internal investigation but was unable to determine how the resident had fentanyl in her system. She confirmed that the resident did not have an order for fentanyl and the facility managed her medications. Additionally, no other residents under the facility’s medication management had orders for fentanyl. During an interview, the resident was unable to recall what had happened but stated that she loved being at the facility and had no concerns about the care she received. During an interview, the resident’s family stated none of her family visitors used fentanyl and it was unknown how the resident would have been exposed to fentanyl. In conclusion, the Minnesota Department of Health determined that neglect was not substantiated. “Not Substantiated” means: An investigatory conclusion indicating the preponderance of evidence shows that an act meeting the definition of maltreatment did not occur. Neglect: Minnesota Statutes, section 626.5572, subdivision 17 “Neglect” means neglect by a caregiver or self-neglect. (a) "Caregiver neglect" means the failure or omission by a caregiver to supply a vulnerable adult with care or services, including but not limited to, food, clothing, shelter, health care, or supervision which is: (1) reasonable and necessary to obtain or maintain the vulnerable adult's physical or mental health or safety, considering the physical and mental capacity or dysfunction of the vulnerable adult; and (2) which is not the result of an accident or therapeutic conduct. Vulnerable Adult interviewed: Yes. Family/Responsible Party interviewed: Yes. Alleged Perpetrator interviewed: Not Applicable. Action taken by facility: The facility started an internal investigation. Action taken by the Minnesota Department of Health: No further action taken at this time. cc: The Office of Ombudsman for Long Term Care The Office of Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities PRINTED: 02/10/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 28522 01/23/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 300 FAXON ROAD NORTH THE HARBOR AT PEACE VILLAGE NORWOOD YOUNG AMERIC, MN 55368 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 On January 23, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health initiated an investigation of complaints #HL285227443M/ HL285222821C . No correction orders are issued. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 Y6BF11 If continuation sheet 1 of 1

2023-08-10
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

A follow-up inspection on October 24, 2023 found that a correction order from an earlier survey had not been resolved; the violation involved appropriate care and services under Minnesota law. The facility was assessed a $3,000 fine for this uncorrected deficiency. The facility has the right to request reconsideration or a hearing within 15 business days of receiving this notice.

Full inspector notes

correction orders issued pursuant to the October 27, 2023, survey. In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31 Subd. 4 (a), state correction orders issued pursuant to the last survey, completed on August 12, 2023, found not corrected at the time of the October 24, 2023, follow-up survey and/or subject to penalty assessment are as follows: 2310-Appropriate Care And Services-144g.91 Subd. 4 (a) - $3,000.00 The details of the violations noted at the time of this follow-up survey completed on October 24, 2023 (listed above), are on the attached State Form. Brackets around the ID Prefix Tag in the left hand column, e.g., {2 ----} will identify the uncorrected tags. Therefore, in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 144G.01 to 144G.9999, t he total amount you are assessed is $3,000.00. You will be invoiced approximately 30 days after receipt of this notice, subject to appeal. DOCUMENTATION OF ACTION TO COMPLY In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.30, Subd. 5(c), the licensee must document actions taken to comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. IMPOSITION OF FINES: Level 1: no fines or enforcement. Level 2: a fine of $500 per violation, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in §144G.20 for widespread violations; Level 3: a fine of $3,000 per violation per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in §144G.20. Level 4: a fine of $5,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in An equal opportunity employer. Letter ID: 8GKP Revised 04/14/2023 The Harbor at Peace Village Novembe r6, 2023 Page 2 §144 G.20. CORRECTION ORDER RECONSIDERATION PROCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.32, Subd. 2, you may challenge the correction order(s) issued, including the level and scope, and any fine assessed through the correction order reconsideration process. The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by the MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. A state correction order under Minn. Stat. § 144G.91, Subd. 8, Free from Maltreatment is associated with a maltreatment determination by the Office of Health Facility Complaints. If maltreatment is substantiated, you will receive a separate letter with the reconsideration process under Minn. Stat. § 626.557. Please email reconsideration requests to: Health.HRD.Appeals@state.mn.us. Please attach this letter as part of your reconsideration request. Please clearly indicate which tag(s) you are contesting and submit information supporting your position(s). Please address your cover letter for reconsideration requests to: Reconsideration Unit HRD 3A, 3rd Floor 625 Robert Street North St. Paul, MN 55155 REQUESTING A HEARING Alternatively, in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31, Subd. 5(d), an assisted living provider that has been assessed a fine under this subdivision has a right to a reconsideration or a hearing under this section and chapter 14. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 144G.20, Subd. 14 and Subd. 18, a request for a hearing must be in writing and received by the MDH within 15 business days of the correction order receipt date. The request must contain a brief and plain statement describing each matter or issue contested and any new information you believe constitutes a defense or mitigating factor. Requests for hearing may be emailed to: Health.HRD.Appeals@state.mn.us. To appeal fines via reconsideration, please follow the procedure outlined above. P lease note that you may request a reconsideration o r a hearing, but not both. We urge you to review these orders carefully. If you have questions, please contact Kelly Thorson at The Harbor at Peace Village Novembe r6, 2023 Page 3 You are encouraged to retain this document for your records. It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and/or state form with your organization’s Governing Body. Sincerely, Kelly Thorson, Supervisor State Evaluation Team Email: kelly.thorson@state.mn.us Telephone: 320-223-7336 Fax: 1-866-890-9290 HHH PRINTED: 11/06/2023 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ R B. WING _____________________________ 28522 10/24/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 300 FAXON ROAD NORTH THE HARBOR AT PEACE VILLAGE NORWOOD YOUNG AMERIC, MN 55368 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) {0 000} Initial Comments {0 000} *****ATTENTION****** Minnesota Department of Health is documenting the State Correction Orders ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING using federal software. Tag numbers have CORRECTION ORDER been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living License In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section Providers. The assigned tag number 144G.08 to 144G.95 this correction order(s) has appears in the far left column entitled "ID been issued pursuant to a survey. Prefix Tag." The state Statute number and the corresponding text of the state Statute Determination of whether a violation has been out of compliance is listed in the corrected requires compliance with all "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" requirements provided at the Statute number column. This column also includes the indicated below. When Minnesota Statute findings which are in violation of the state contains several items, failure to comply with any requirement after the statement, "This of the items will be considered lack of Minnesota requirement is not met as compliance. evidenced by." Following the surveyors' findings is the Time Period for Correction. INITIAL COMMENTS: Project SL28522015-1 PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH On October 24, 2023 through October 25, 2023, STATES,"PROVIDER'S PLAN OF the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a CORRECTION." THIS APPLIES TO revisit at the above provider to follow-up on FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS orders issued pursuant to a survey completed on WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. August 11, 2023. At the time of the survey, there were residents: 28 receiving services under the THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO Assisted Living license. As a result of the revisit, SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR the following orders were reissued. VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES. An immediate correction order was identified on October 24, 2023, issued for SL28522015-1, tag The letter in the left column is used for identification 2310. tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 On October 25, 2023, the immediacy of subd. 1, 2, and 3. correction order 2310 was removed, however, non-compliance remained at a level 3, scope of widespread violation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 E3OX12 If continuation sheet 1 of 27 PRINTED: 11/06/2023 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ R B. WING _____________________________ 28522 10/24/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 300 FAXON ROAD NORTH THE HARBOR AT PEACE VILLAGE NORWOOD YOUNG AMERIC, MN 55368 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) {0 250} Continued From page 1 {0 250} {0 250} 144G.20 Subdivision 1 Conditions {0 250} SS=F (a) The commissioner may refuse to grant a provisional license, refuse to grant a license as a result of a change in ownership, refuse to renew a license, suspend or revoke a license, or impose a conditional license if the owner, controlling individual, or employee of an assisted living facility: (1) is in violation of, or during the term of the license has violated, any of the requirements in this chapter or adopted rules; (2) permits, aids, or abets the commission of any illegal act in the provision of assisted living services; (3) performs any act detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of a resident; (4) obtains the license by fraud or misrepresentation; (5) knowingly makes a false statement of a material fact in the application for a license or in any other record or report required by this chapter; (6) denies representatives of the department access to any part of the facility's books, records, files, or employees; (7) interferes with or impedes a representative of the department in contacting the facility's residents; (8) interferes with or impedes ombudsman access according to section 256.

§ 07 · Nearby

Other facilities in Norwood Youngamerica.

Other memory care facilities near Norwood Youngamerica with similar care offerings.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.