Editorial Independence

StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from any operator. Rankings are derived solely from state inspection records and verified family reviews.

StarlynnCare
Minnesota · Mountain Iron

Diamond Willow Assisted Living.

Diamond Willow Assisted Living is Grade C−, ranked in the bottom 47% of Minnesota memory care with 1 MDH citation on record; last inspected Feb 2026.

ALF · Memory Care26 licensed beds · mediumDementia-trained staff
8583 Unity Drive · Mountain Iron, MN 55768LIC# ALRC:220
Limited Inspection History · fewer than 4 records in 3 years
Facility · Mountain Iron
A 26-bed ALF · Memory Care with one citation on file (Jul 2023).
Last inspection · Feb 2026 · citedSource · MDH
Licensed beds
26
Memory care
✓ Yes
Last inspection
Feb 2026
Last citation
Jul 2023
Operated by
Phone
§ 01 · Snapshot

A medium home, reviewed on public record.

§ 02 · Peer Comparison

Ranked against 187 Minnesota facilities.

ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Minnesota Dept. of Health · Health Regulation Division.

Severity rank
12th
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
100th
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
peer median
0
100
Frequency rank
28th
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

FACILITY WATCH · BETA

Diamond Willow Assisted Living has 1 citation on record. Know the moment anything changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

§ 03 · The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

1 deficiencie on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

0weighted score · 24 mo
No citation activity in this window.
peer median
Jun 2024May 2026

Finding distribution

1 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G1
H
I
Sev 2
D
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
§ 05 · Tour Prep

Questions to ask before you visit.

A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Diamond Willow Assisted Living's record and state requirements.

01 /

The most recent MDH inspection on February 26, 2026 found zero deficiencies across all standards — can you walk us through the specific dementia care practices and documentation systems that have helped maintain this compliance record?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

02 /

One complaint was filed with the Minnesota Department of Health during the inspection period on file — can you share whether that complaint was substantiated, and if so, what corrective steps the facility took in response?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

03 /

As an Assisted Living Facility with Dementia Care licensed under Minnesota Statutes chapter 144G, what written dementia care program and staff training documentation can you provide to families during a tour?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

§ 06 · Full Inspection Record

Every MDH visit, verbatim.

2 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

2
reports on file
1
total deficiencies
2026-02-26
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

During a routine inspection on February 26, 2026, the Minnesota Department of Health found that Diamond Willow Assisted Living did not meet state requirements for its infection control program. The facility received a correction order and was assessed a $500 fine, and must document the actions it takes to correct this violation.

Full inspector notes

correction orders and document the actions taken to comply in the facility's records. The Department reserves the right to return to the facility at any time should the Department receive a complaint or deem it necessary to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of residents in your care. STATE CORRECTIO NORDERS The enclosed State Form documents the state correction orders. MDH documents state licensing correction orders using federal software. Tag numbers are assigned to Minnesota state statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state statute number and the corresponding text of the state statute out of compliance are listed in the "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" column. This column also includes the findings that are in violation of the state statute after the statement, "This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by . . ." IMPOSITION OF FINES In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31, Subd. 4, fines and enforcement actions may be imposed based on the level and scope of the violations and may be imposed immediately with no opportunity to correct the violation first as follows: Level 1: no fines or enforcement; Level 2: a fine of $500 per violation, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20; Level 3: a fine of $1,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20; An equal opportunity employer. Letter ID: IS7N REVISE D09/13/2021 Diamond Willow Assisted Living March 20, 2026 Page 2 Level 4: a fine of $3,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20; Level 5: a fine of $5,000 per violation, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20. Therefore, in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 144G.01 to 144G.9999, the following fines are assessed pursuant to this survey: St - 0 - 0510 - 144g.41 Subd. 3 - Infection Control Program - $500.00 The refor e, in accor danc e wit h Minn. Sta t. §§ 144G.01 to 144G.999 9, the total amount you are assessed is $500.00. You will be invoiced approximately 30 days after receipt of this notice, subject to appeal . DOCUMENTATIO ONF ACTION TO COMPLY In accorda nce with Min n. Stat. § 144G.30, Sub d. 5(c), th e lic ens ee mus t docum ent ac tions taken t o comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. The correction order documentation should include the following: Identify how the area( s) of noncompliance was corrected related to the · resident( s)/ employee( s) identified in the correction order. Identify how the area( s) of noncompliance was corrected for all of the provider’s · resident( s)/ employees that may be affected by the noncompliance. Identify what changes to your systems and practices were made to ensure compliance with · the specific statute( s). CORRECTIO NORDER RECONSIDERATIO PNROCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.32, Subd. 2, you may challenge the correction order( s) issued, including the level and scope, and any fine assessed through the correction order reconsideration process. The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. To submit a reconsideration request, please visit: https: / / forms. web. health. state. mn.us/ form/ HRDAppealsForm REQUESTIN GA HEARING Alternatively, in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31, Subd. 5(d), an assisted living provider that has been assessed a fine under this subdivision has a right to a reconsideration or a hearing under this section and chapter 14. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 144G.20, Subd. 14 and Subd. 18, a request for a hearing must be in writing and received by the Department of Health within 15 business days of the correction order receipt date. The request must contain a brief and plain statement describing each matter or issue contested and any new information you believe constitutes a defense or mitigating factor. Diamond Willow Assisted Living March 20, 2026 Page 3 To submit a hearing request, please visit: https: / / forms. web. health. state. mn. us/ form/ HRDAppealsForm To appe al fi nes via re cons iderat ion , pl ease follow the procedu r e outl ined abo ve. Plea se no te tha t you may re que st a rec onside rati on or a hearing, bu t not bot h. If you wish to cont est ta gs with out fine s in a reconsideration and tags with the fines at a hearing, please submit two separate appeals forms at the website listed above. The MDH Health Regulation Division (HRD )values your feedback about your experience during the survey and/ or investigation process. Please fill out this anonymous provider feedback questionnaire at your conv enien ce at thi s link: https: / / forms. office.com/ g/ Bm5uQEpHVa. Your inpu t is import ant to us and will enable MDH to improve its processes and communication with providers. If you have any questions regarding the questionnaire, please contact Susan Winkelmann at susan. winkelmann@state. mn.us or call 651-201-5952. You are encouraged to retain this document for your records. It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and state form with your organization’s Governing Body. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jessie Chenze, Supervisor State Evaluation Team Email: Jessie.Chenze@state. mn.us Telephone: 218-332-5175 Fax: 1-866-890-9290 CLN PRINTED: 03/ 20/ 2026 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/ SUPPLIER/ CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 24664 02/ 26/ 2026 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 8583 UNITY DRIVE DIAMOND WILLOW ASSISTED LIVING MOUNTAIN IRON, MN 55768 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER' S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS- REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 *****ATTENTION***** Minnesota Department of Health is documenting the State Correction Orders ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING using federal software. Tag numbers have CORRECTION ORDER( S) been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section assigned tag number appears in the 144G. 08 to 144G. 95, these correction orders are far-left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag. " The issued pursuant to a survey. state Statute number and the corresponding text of the state Statute out Determination of whether violations are corrected of compliance is listed in the "Summary requires compliance with all requirements Statement of Deficiencies" column. This provided at the Statute number indicated below. column also includes the findings which When Minnesota Statute contains several items, are in violation of the state requirement failure to comply with any of the items will be after the statement, "This Minnesota considered lack of compliance. requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the evaluators' findings is the INITIAL COMMENTS: Time Period for Correction. SL24664016- 0 PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH On February 24, 2026, through February 26, STATES, "PROVIDER' S PLAN OF 2026, the Minnesota Department of Health CORRECTION. " THIS APPLIES TO conducted a full survey at the above provider and FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS the following correction orders are issued. At the WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. time of the survey, there were 25 residents; 25 receiving services under the Assisted Living THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO Facility with Dementia Care license. SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES. THE LETTER IN THE LEFT COLUMN IS USED FOR TRACKING PURPOSES AND REFLECTS THE SCOPE AND LEVEL ISSUED PURSUANT TO 144G. 31 SUBDIVISION 1-3. 0 460 144G. 41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements 0 460 SS= D (5) provide a means for residents to request LABORATORY DIRECTOR' S OR PROVIDER/ SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE' S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 3VG011 If continuation sheet 1 of 24 PRINTED: 03/ 20/ 2026 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/ SUPPLIER/ CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B.

2023-07-24
Complaint Investigation
1 · Substantiated Finding

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation substantiated that a facility staff member verbally abused a resident with dementia by yelling profanities, stomping, swinging her arms in a threatening manner, and threatening to slash the resident's throat; the staff member's conduct was witnessed by nursing and unlicensed staff despite their interventions to stop the behavior. The resident, who had early onset Alzheimer's Disease and anxiety, was identified in their care plan as at risk for abuse and required 24-hour supervision. The Minnesota Department of Health determined the abuse allegation was substantiated and the staff member was responsible for the maltreatment.

Substantiated FindingMinn. Stat. §MN-SUBST
Verbatim citation text · Minn. Stat. §MN-SUBST

MDH substantiated maltreatment or licensing violation finding

Full inspector notes

Finding: Substantiated, individual responsibility Nature of Investigation: The Minnesota Department of Health investigated an allegation of maltreatment, in accordance with the Minnesota Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act, Minn. Stat. 626.557, and to evaluate compliance with applicable licensing standards for the provider type. Initial Investigation Allegation(s): The alleged perpetrator (AP), facility staff, abused a resident when the AP yelled at the resident and repeatedly acted in an intimidating, threatening, manner while the AP stomped and swung their arms around and threatened to slash the resident's throat. Investigative Findings and Conclusion: The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was substantiated. The AP was responsible for the maltreatment. The AP was witnessed slamming her fists on the table, stomping her feet, and swinging her arms around while yelling in the resident’s face, “Fuck you, you want to see mad, now I am fucking mad!” “You just couldn’t leave me alone”! The AP continued to yell at the resident despite staff intervening twice. The AP stated she would, “slash [residents] throat from ear to ear.” The investigator conducted interviews with facility staff members, including administrative staff, nursing staff, and unlicensed staff. The investigation included review of AP personnel files, An equal opportunity employer. training records, resident records, progress notes, incident report, facility investigation documentation, and witness statements. The resident resided in an assisted living facility memory care unit with diagnoses including early onset Alzheimer’s Disease, moderate depressive disorder, and anxiety. The resident’s assessment indicated the resident was cognitively impaired and could be disoriented and anxious at times. The resident’s care plan and individual abuse prevention plan identified the resident was at risk for abuse and mental abuse related to impaired judgment. The resident required 24-hour supervision and staff assistance, with ques and reassurance to protect the resident from abuse. One day the resident’s progress note indicated the resident was having agitation and behaviors with repetitive questions. A short time later a facility incident report indicated the resident told the AP she was being rude and mean, and the resident did not like how the AP was treating people. The incident report indicated the resident and AP argued and the AP walked away, however the resident followed the AP and they continued to argue. The AP then got up and started yelling and swearing at the resident. Staff intervened and separated the AP from the resident, and the AP left the facility. The report indicated the resident attempted to follow the AP, and the AP continued to yell and swear at the resident. The progress note indicated when the AP returned to the facility she began yelling and swearing at the resident again, staff separated the AP from the resident, and instructed the AP to leave the building. When interviewed a facility nursing staff stated the AP and resident argued back and forth for approximately 10 to 15 minutes. The resident followed the AP and continued asking the AP why she was acting that way. Suddenly, the AP yelled at the resident, “Fuck you, you want to see mad! You want to see fucking mad; now this is mad! You just could not leave me alone!” The nurse stated the AP slammed her fists on the table, stomped her feet, and swung her arms around while yelling in the resident’s face in a threatening intimidating manor. The nurse stated she intervened and sent the AP outside two separate times, but the AP returned and continued to yell and swear at the resident and blamed the resident for making her angry. The nurse stated the incident was frightening, shocking, and the AP’s response toward the resident was pure anger and rage. When interviewed two unlicensed staff stated they witnessed the incident between the AP and the resident. The staff stated the AP and resident were arguing, and suddenly the AP threw her hands up, slammed her fists on the table, started to “storm” and stomp around in a threatening manner, and repeatedly yelled at and swore in the resident’s face. One staff stated she heard the AP tell the resident she would, “slash her throat from ear to ear”. When interviewed the AP stated she had personal issues going on in her life and was having a bad day when the resident accused her of being rude to another resident. The AP stated she initially walked away, but the resident followed her and continued to ask repetitive questions. The AP stated she “blew up” at the resident and yelled at the resident in anger, but stated she never touched the resident. The AP indicated she went outside a couple of times to cool off, but when she came back in the facility the resident continued to accuse her of doing something wrong. The AP stated she yelled at the resident repeatedly over 20-30 minutes but denied swearing at or threatening to harm the resident. When the AP was asked what she said to the resident the AP did not recall. In conclusion, the Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was substantiated. Substantiated: Minnesota Statutes, section 626.5572, Subdivision 19. “Substantiated” means a preponderance of evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred. Abuse: Minnesota Statutes section 626.5572, subdivision 2. "Abuse" means: (a) An act against a vulnerable adult that constitutes a violation of, an attempt to violate, or aiding and abetting a violation of: (1) assault in the first through fifth degrees as defined in sections 609.221 to 609.224; (2) the use of drugs to injure or facilitate crime as defined in section 609.235; (3) the solicitation, inducement, and promotion of prostitution as defined in section 609.322; and (4) criminal sexual conduct in the first through fifth degrees as defined in sections 609.342 to 609.3451. A violation includes any action that meets the elements of the crime, regardless of whether there is a criminal proceeding or conviction. (b) Conduct which is not an accident or therapeutic conduct as defined in this section, which produces or could reasonably be expected to produce physical pain or injury or emotional distress including, but not limited to, the following: (1) hitting, slapping, kicking, pinching, biting, or corporal punishment of a vulnerable adult; (2) use of repeated or malicious oral, written, or gestured language toward a vulnerable adult or the treatment of a vulnerable adult which would be considered by a reasonable person to be disparaging, derogatory, humiliating, harassing, or threatening. Vulnerable Adult interviewed: No, unable. Family/Responsible Party interviewed: Yes. Alleged Perpetrator interviewed: Yes the Action taken by facility: The facility investigated the incident. The AP is no longer employed by the facility. Action taken by the Minnesota Department of Health: The facility was issued a correction order regarding the vulnerable adult’s right to be free from maltreatment. You may also call 651-201-4200 to receive a copy via mail or email. The responsible party will be notified of their right to appeal the maltreatment finding. If the maltreatment is substantiated against an identified employee, this report will be submitted to the nurse aide registry for possible inclusion of the finding on the abuse registry and/or to the Minnesota Department of Human Services for possible disqualification in accordance with the provisions of the background study requirements under Minnesota 245C. cc: The Office of Ombudsman for Long Term Care The Office of Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities St. Louis County Attorney Mountain Iron City Attorney Mountain Iron Police Department PRINTED: 07/27/2023 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 24664 07/12/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 8583 UNITY DRIVE DIAMOND WILLOW OF MOUNTAIN IRO N MOUNTAIN IRON, MN 55768 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 ******ATTENTION****** Minnesota Department of Health is documenting the State Correction Orders ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING using federal software. Tag numbers have CORRECTION ORDER been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living License In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section Providers. The assigned tag number 144G.08 to 144G.95, these correction orders are appears in the far left column entitled "ID issued pursuant to a complaint investigation.

1 older inspection from 2022 are not shown in the free view.

1 older inspection (20222023) are available with a premium membership.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.