Haven Homes Assisted Living.
Haven Homes Assisted Living is Grade A, ranked in the top 1% of Minnesota memory care with no MDH citations on record; last inspected May 2025.
A large home, reviewed on public record.
Ranked against 138 Minnesota facilities.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Minnesota Dept. of Health · Health Regulation Division.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Be first to know if Haven Homes Assisted Living's inspection record changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
No citations in the last 36 months.
Finding distribution
none · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Haven Homes Assisted Living's record and state requirements.
The Minnesota Department of Health roster shows Haven Homes holds an Assisted Living Facility with Dementia Care license under Minn. Stat. ch. 144G — can you walk us through the written dementia care program and explain how it differs from the general assisted living services for the other residents?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
MDH records show 1 complaint was filed during the inspection period on file — was that complaint substantiated, and can you share the facility's written response or corrective action plan that addressed the concern?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The most recent MDH inspection on May 2, 2025 found zero deficiencies across 3 reports — can you show families the inspection reports themselves and explain how the facility maintains compliance with Minnesota's dementia care regulations?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every MDH visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-04-08Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
The Minnesota Department of Health investigated a complaint that staff neglected a resident by improperly using a mechanical lift, which resulted in a femur fracture. The investigation concluded that neglect was not substantiated because the resident had osteoporosis and a history of fractures, and medical imaging showed the fracture was pathological, meaning it could not be determined when or how it occurred. The facility reviewed mechanical lift procedures and emergency protocols with all staff following the incident.
Full inspector notes
Finding: Not Substantiated Nature of Investigation: The Minnesota Department of Health investigated an allegation of maltreatment, in accordance with the Minnesota Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act, Minn. Stat. 626.557, and to evaluate compliance with applicable licensing standards for the provider type. Initial Investigation Allegation(s): The facility neglected the resident when staff used a mechanical standing lift to transfer the resident. During the transfer, the staff member lowered the resident to the floor, and the resident sustained a femur fracture. Investigative Findings and Conclusion: The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. The resident sustained a fracture, but there was insufficient evidence to attribute the injury to staff. The resident had osteoporosis, a history of fractures and x-ray indicated the femur fracture was pathological therefore it could not be determined when or how the fracture occurred. The investigator conducted interviews with facility staff, including administrative, nursing, and unlicensed staff, as well as the outside hospice provider. The investigation included a review of the resident’s facility and hospice records, the death certificate, internal investigation reports, personnel and training records, and facility policies and procedures. The investigator also observed the unit and care provided, including mechanical lift transfers. The resident resided in an assisted living memory care unit with diagnoses including dementia and osteoporosis. The residents’ services included assistance with all activities of daily living including a mechanical standing lift. The resident’s assessment indicated she was unable to communicate her needs, non ambulatory, had generalized pain and enrolled in hospice services for over one year. A facility incident report indicated that during a routine mechanical stand transfer from the resident’s chair to the hospital bed, the resident began to fall. The staff member lowered the resident to the floor and called for assistance. The resident did not report pain or display nonverbal signs of pain. Two staff members assisted the resident into bed and notified the facility nurse. The nurse assessed the resident and contacted hospice. The resident record indicated a provider examined the resident, adjusted her medication, applied ice packs, and directed facility staff to keep the resident bedbound and non-weight-bearing until a mobile x-ray could be completed and further direction was provided by the provider. The resident record indicated that the provider reviewed X-rays and examined the resident. Imaging showed a femur fracture and widespread reduced bone density consistent with a pathological fracture. The treatment plan included comfort measures, a leg immobilizer, bed rest, and no weight-bearing or range-of-motion movement of the affected leg. During an interview, a staff member present on the day of the incident reported that they had used the mechanical lift successfully for the resident on many previous occasions and that the incident was unexpected. The staff member stated the lift operated correctly when they lowered the resident to the floor. During interviews, several licensed and unlicensed staff members stated the mechanical lift functioned well for both the resident and staff. They reported no concerns or observed issues with the residents’ safety or comfort during their use over several months. During an interview, a manager stated there were no concerns about the staff member, who provided “excellent” care. Following the investigation, the facility coached the staff member to call a nurse before assisting a resident off the floor. The staff member also redemonstrated the correct use of all mechanical lifts used at the facility. During an interview, the outside provider reported the resident’s fracture was pathological and stated that when the fracture occurred was unknown. The provider reported visiting the resident at the facility multiple times over several months and stated that staff were consistently kind and competent and went “above and beyond expectations”. During an interview, the resident’s family stated they visited frequently, that the resident had lived at the facility for years, and that they had no concerns, and that the staff took “wonderful” care of the resident. In conclusion, the Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. “Not Substantiated” means: An investigatory conclusion indicating the preponderance of evidence shows that an act meeting the definition of maltreatment did not occur. Neglect: Minnesota Statutes, section 626.5572, subdivision 17 “Neglect” means neglect by a caregiver or self-neglect. (a) "Caregiver neglect" means the failure or omission by a caregiver to supply a vulnerable adult with care or services, including but not limited to, food, clothing, shelter, health care, or supervision which is: (1) reasonable and necessary to obtain or maintain the vulnerable adult's physical or mental health or safety, considering the physical and mental capacity or dysfunction of the vulnerable adult; and (2) which is not the result of an accident or therapeutic conduct. Vulnerable Adult interviewed: No, deceased Family/Responsible Party interviewed: Yes Alleged Perpetrator interviewed: Not Applicable Action taken by facility: After the facility completed an internal investigation, it provided a review of mechanical lift transfers and emergency procedures to all staff and updated a frequently used communication tool. Action taken by the Minnesota Department of Health: No further action taken at this time. cc: The Office of Ombudsman for Long Term Care The Office of Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities PRINTED: 04/ 15/ 2026 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/ SUPPLIER/ CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 37302 03/ 10/ 2026 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 4848 GATEWAY BOULEVARD HAVEN HOMES ASSISTED LIVING MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER' S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS- REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 On March 10, 2026 the Minnesota Department of Health initiated an investigation of complaint #HL373021860M/ #HL373026884C. No correction orders are issued. LABORATORY DIRECTOR' S OR PROVIDER/ SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE' S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 JWSR11 If continuation sheet 1 of 1
2025-05-02Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection of Haven Homes Assisted Living on May 2, 2025 found one violation related to fire protection and physical environment under Minnesota's assisted living regulations. The facility was assessed a $500 fine for this Level 2 violation and must document the corrective actions taken within the timeframe specified by the state.
Full inspector notes
correction orders and document the actions taken to comply in the facility's records. The Department reserves the right to return to the facility at any time should the Department receive a complaint or deem it necessary to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of residents in your care. STATE CORRECTION ORDERS The enclosed State Form documents the state correction orders. MDH documents state licensing correction orders using federal software. Tag numbers are assigned to Minnesota state statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state statute number and the corresponding text of the state statute out of compliance are listed in the "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" column. This column also includes the findings that are in violation of the state statute after the statement, "This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by . . ." IMPOSITION OF FINES In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31, Subd. 4, fines and enforcement actions may be imposed based on the level and scope of the violations and may be imposed immediately with no opportunity to correct the violation first as follows: Level 1: no fines or enforcement. Level 2: a fine of $500 per violation, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20 for widespread violations; Level 3: a fine of $3,000 per violation per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20. Level 4: a fine of $5,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in An equal opportunity employer. Letter ID: IS7N REVISED 09/13/2021 Haven Homes Assisted Living June 13, 2025 Page 2 § 144G.20. Therefore, in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 144G.01 to 144G.9999, the following fines are assessed pursuant to this survey: St - 0 - 0775 - 144g.45 Subd. 2. (a) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment - $500.00 Therefore, in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 144G.01 to 144G.9999, t he total amount you are assessed is $500.00. You will be invoiced approximately 30 days after receipt of this notice, subject to appeal. DOCUMENTATION OF ACTION TO COMPLY In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.30, Subd. 5(c), the licensee must document actions taken to comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. The correction order documentation should include the following: Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected related to the resident(s)/employee(s) identified in the correction order. Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected for all of the provider’s resident(s)/employees that may be affected by the noncompliance. Identify what changes to your systems and practices were made to ensure compliance with the specific statute(s). CORRECTION ORDER RECONSIDERATION PROCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.32, Subd. 2, you may challenge the correction order(s) issued, including the level and scope, and any fine assessed through the correction order reconsideration process. The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. To submit a reconsideration request, please visit: https://forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/HRDAppealsForm REQUESTING A HEARING Alternatively, in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31, Subd. 5(d), an assisted living provider that has been assessed a fine under this subdivision has a right to a reconsideration or a hearing under this section and chapter 14. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 144G.20, Subd. 14 and Subd. 18, a request for a hearing must be in writing and received by the Department of Health within 15 business days of the correction order receipt date. The request must contain a brief and plain statement describing each matter or issue contested and any new information you believe constitutes a defense or mitigating factor. To submit a hearing request, please visit: Haven Homes Assisted Living June 13, 2025 Page 3 https://forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/HRDAppealsForm To appeal fines via reconsideration, please follow the procedure outlined above. P lease note that you may request a reconsideration o r a hearing, but not both. If you wish to contest tags without fines in a reconsideration and tags with the fines at a hearing, please submit two separate appeals forms at the website listed above. The MDH Health Regulation Division (HRD) values your feedback about your experience during the survey and/or investigation process. Please fill out this anonymous provider feedback questionnaire at your convenience at this link: h ttps://forms.office.com/g/Bm5uQEpHVa. Your input is important to us and will enable MDH to improve its processes and communication with providers. If you have any questions regarding the questionnaire, please contact Susan Winkelmann at susan.winkelmann@state.mn.us or call 651-201-5952. You are encouraged to retain this document for your records. It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and state form with your organization’s Governing Body. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Kelly Thorson, Supervisor State Evaluation Team Email: Kelly.Thorson@state.mn.us Telephone: 320-223-7336 Fax: 1-866-890-9290 HHH PRINTED: 06/13/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 37302 05/02/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 4848 GATEWAY BOULEVARD HAVEN HOMES ASSISTED LIVING MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING Minnesota Department of Health is CORRECTION ORDER(S) documenting the State Correction Orders using federal software. Tag numbers have In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section been assigned to Minnesota State 144G.08 to 144G.95, these correction orders are Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The issued pursuant to a survey. assigned tag number appears in the far-left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The Determination of whether violations are corrected state Statute number and the requires compliance with all requirements corresponding text of the state Statute out provided at the Statute number indicated below. of compliance is listed in the "Summary When Minnesota Statute contains several items, Statement of Deficiencies" column. This failure to comply with any of the items will be column also includes the findings which considered lack of compliance. are in violation of the state requirement after the statement, "This Minnesota INITIAL COMMENTS: requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the evaluators ' findings is the SL37302016-0 Time Period for Correction. On April 28, 2025, through May 1, 2025, the PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF survey at the above provider. At the time of the STATES,"PROVIDER'S PLAN OF survey, there were 81 resident(s); 62 of whom CORRECTION." THIS APPLIES TO were receiving services under the Assisted Living FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS Facility with Dementia Care license. WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES. THE LETTER IN THE LEFT COLUMN IS USED FOR TRACKING PURPOSES AND REFLECTS THE SCOPE AND LEVEL ISSUED PURSUANT TO 144G.31 SUBDIVISION 1-3. 0 650 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records 0 650 SS=D (a) The facility must maintain current records of LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 B3QO11 If continuation sheet 1 of 24 PRINTED: 06/13/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 37302 05/02/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 4848 GATEWAY BOULEVARD HAVEN HOMES ASSISTED LIVING MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 650 Continued From page 1 0 650 each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services.
2023-06-21Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection on June 21, 2023 found Haven Homes Assisted Living in violation of infection control program requirements under Minnesota state law. The facility was issued a correction order and assessed a $500 fine for this violation. The facility must document the actions it took to correct the deficiency within the timeframe specified by the state.
Full inspector notes
correction orders. The MDH documents state licensing correction orders using federal software. Tag numbers are assigned to Minnesota state statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state statute number and the corresponding text of the state statute out of compliance are listed in the "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" column. This column also includes the findings that are in violation of the state statute after the statement, "This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by . . ." IMPOSITION OF FINES In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31, Subd. 4, fines and enforcement actions may be imposed based on the level and scope of the violations and may be imposed immediately with no opportunity to correct the violation first as follows: Level 1: no fines or enforcement. Level 2: a fine of $500 per violation, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20 for widespread violations; Level 3: a fine of $3,000 per violation per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20. Level 4: a fine of $5,000 per incident, in addition to any enforcement mechanism authorized in § 144G.20. In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31, Subd. 4 (a)(5), the MDH may impose fine amounts of either $1,000 or $5,000 to licensees who are found to be responsible for maltreatment. The MDH may impose a fine of $1,000 for each substantiated maltreatment violation that consists of abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation according to Minn. Stat. § 626.5572, Subds. 2, 9, 17. The MDH also may impose a fine of $5,000 for each substantiated maltreatment violation consisting of sexual An equal opportunity employer. Letter ID: IS7N REVISED 09/13/ 2021 Haven Homes Assisted Living July 17, 2023 Page 2 assault, death, or abuse resulting in serious injury. In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31, Subd. 4 (b), when a fine is assessed against a facility for substantiated maltreatment, the commissioner shall not also impose an immediate fine under this chapter for the same circumstance. Therefore, in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 144G.01 to 144G.9999, the following fines are assessed pursuant to this survey: St - 0 - 0510 - 144g.41 Subd. 3 - Infection Control Program = $500.00 The re fore , in accorda nc e wi th Mi nn. Sta t. §§ 144G. 01 to 144 G .9999, the total amount you are assessed is $500.00. You will be invoiced approximately 30 days after receipt of this notice, subject to appeal . DOCUMENTATIO ONF ACTION TO COMPLY In accorda nc e wi th Mi nn. Sta t. § 144G.30, Subd. 5(c), the licens ee mus t doc ument acti ons ta ken to comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. The correction order documentation should include the following: Identify how the area( s) of noncompliance was corrected related to the · resident( s)/ employee(s) identified in the correction order. Identify how the area( s) of noncompliance was corrected for all of the provider’s · resident( s)/ employees that may be affected by the noncompliance. Identify what changes to your systems and practices were made to ensure compliance with the · specific statute( s). CORRECTIO NORDER RECONSIDERATIO PNROCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.32, Subd. 2, you may challenge the correction order(s) issued, including the level and scope, and any fine assessed through the correction order reconsideration process. The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by the MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. A state correction order under Minn. Stat. § 144G.91, Subd. 8, Free from Maltreatment is associated with a maltreatment determination by the Office of Health Facility Complaints. If maltreatment is substantiated, you will receive a separate letter with the reconsideration process under Minn. Stat. § 626.557. Pl ea se ema il rec ons idera ti on reques ts to: Health. HRDA. ppeals@state. mn. us. Pl ea se atta c h thi s letter as part of your reconsideration request. Please clearly indicate which tag( s) you are contesting and submit information supporting your position(s). Please address your cover letter for reconsideration requests to: Haven Homes Assisted Living July 17, 2023 Page 3 Reconsideration Unit 85 East Seventh Place St. Paul, MN 55164-0970 REQUESTIN GA HEARING Alternatively, in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31, Subd. 5(d), an assisted living provider that has been assessed a fine under this subdivision has a right to a reconsideration or a hearing under this section and chapter 14. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 144G.20, Subd. 14 and Subd. 18, a request for a hearing must be in writing and received by the MDH within 15 business days of the correction order receipt date. The request must contain a brief and plain statement describing each matter or issue contested and any new information you believe constitutes a defense or mitigating factor. Requests for hea ri ng ma y be ema iled to: Health. HRDA. ppeals@state. mn. us. To appe al fi ne s vi a rec ons ider a ti on, pl ease fol low the proc edure outl ined above . Pl ease note tha t you ma y re ques t a rec ons idera ti on or a hea ri ng , but not both. You are encouraged to retain this document for your records. It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and state form with your organization’s Governing Body. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jess Schoenecker, Supervisor State Evaluation Team Email: jess. schoenecker@ state. mn.us Telephone: 651-201-3789 Fax: 651-281-9796 PMB PRINTED: 07/ 17/ 2023 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/ SUPPLIER/ CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 37302 06/ 21/ 2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 4848 GATEWAY BOULEVARD HAVEN HOMES ASSISTED LIVING MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER' S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS- REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 ******ATTENTION****** Minnesota Department of Health is documenting the State Correction Orders ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING using federal software. Tag numbers have CORRECTION ORDER( S) been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living License In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section Providers. The assigned tag number 144G. 08 to 144G. 95, these correction orders are appears in the far left column entitled "ID issued pursuant to a survey. Prefix Tag." The state Statute number and the corresponding text of the state Statute Determination of whether violations are corrected out of compliance is listed in the requires compliance with all requirements "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" provided at the Statute number indicated below. column. This column also includes the When Minnesota Statute contains several items, findings which are in violation of the state failure to comply with any of the items will be requirement after the statement, "This considered lack of compliance. Minnesota requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the surveyors' INITIAL COMMENTS: findings is the Time Period for Correction. SL37302015 PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF On June 20, 2023, through June 21, 2023, the THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH survey at the above provider, and the following CORRECTION. " THIS APPLIES TO correction orders are issued. At the time of the FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS survey, there were eighty- five (85) active WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. residents; fifty-nine (59) receiving services under the Assisted Living with Dementia Care license. THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES. The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G. 31 subd. 1, 2, and 3. 0 470 144G.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.