The Encore at Hugo.
The Encore at Hugo is Grade A, ranked in the top 1% of Minnesota memory care with no MDH citations on record; last inspected Apr 2025.

A medium home, reviewed on public record.
Ranked against 85 Minnesota facilities.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Minnesota Dept. of Health · Health Regulation Division.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Be first to know if The Encore at Hugo's inspection record changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
No citations in the last 36 months.
Finding distribution
none · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to The Encore at Hugo's record and state requirements.
The most recent inspection on April 30, 2025, found zero deficiencies across all areas — can you share the written inspection report from the Minnesota Department of Health and walk through how you prepared for that survey?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Two complaints were filed with MDH during the inspection period on record — were either of those complaints substantiated, and what documentation can you provide about how the facility responded to those concerns?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
This facility holds an Assisted Living Facility with Dementia Care license under Minnesota Statutes chapter 144G — can you show families the written dementia care program and explain how staff competency in dementia care is assessed and documented?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every MDH visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-04-30Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
On July 21, 2025, Minnesota Department of Health conducted a follow-up survey at The Encore at Hugo to check on corrections from an April 30, 2025 inspection and found the facility in substantial compliance with state requirements. Food service requirements were not reviewed during this follow-up visit. The facility had previously been issued correction orders that were addressed to reach substantial compliance.
Full inspector notes
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ R B. WING _____________________________ 30353 07/21/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 5607 150TH STREET NORTH THE ENCORE AT HUGO HUGO, MN 55038 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) {0 000} Initial Comments {0 000} *****ATTENTION****** ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER FOLLOW UP SURVEY INITIAL COMMENTS SL#30353016-1 On July 21, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a follow-up survey at the above provider to follow-up on orders issued pursuant to a survey completed on April 30, 2025. As a result of the follow-up survey, the licensee is in substantial compliance. {0 480} 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum {0 480} SS=F requirements; required food services (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. (b) For an assisted living facility with a licensed capacity of ten or fewer residents: (1) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.0033, item A, the facility may share a certified food protection manager (CFPM) with one other facility located within a 60-mile radius and under common management provided the CFPM is present at each facility frequently enough to effectively administer, manage, and supervise each facility's food service operation; (2) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.0545, item A, kick plates that are not removable or cannot be rotated open are allowed unless the facility has been issued repeated correction orders for violations of Minnesota Rules, part 4626.1565 or 4626.1570; LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 JT8C12 If continuation sheet 1 of 12 PRINTED: 08/29/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ R B. WING _____________________________ 30353 07/21/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 5607 150TH STREET NORTH THE ENCORE AT HUGO HUGO, MN 55038 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) {0 480} Continued From page 1 {0 480} (3) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.0685, item A, the facility is not required to provide integral drainboards, utensil racks, or tables large enough to accommodate soiled and clean items that may accumulate during hours of operation provided soiled items do not contaminate clean items, surfaces, or food, and clean equipment and dishes are air dried in a manner that prevents contamination before storage; (4) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.1070, item A, the facility is not required to install a dedicated handwashing sink in its existing kitchen provided it designates one well of a two-compartment sink for use only as a handwashing sink; (5) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, parts 4626.1325, 4626.1335, and 4626.1360, item A, existing floor, wall, and ceiling finishes are allowed provided the facility keeps them clean and in good condition; (6) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.1375, shielded or shatter-resistant lightbulbs are not required, but if a light bulb breaks, the facility must discard all exposed food and fully clean all equipment, dishes, and surfaces to remove any glass particles; and (7) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.1390, toilet rooms are not required to be provided with a self-closing door. This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by: Not reviewed during this survey. {0 485} 144G.41 Subdivision 1.a (a) Minimum {0 485} SS=C requirements; required food services STATE FORM 6899 JT8C12 If continuation sheet 2 of 12 PRINTED: 08/29/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ R B. WING _____________________________ 30353 07/21/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 5607 150TH STREET NORTH THE ENCORE AT HUGO HUGO, MN 55038 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) {0 485} Continued From page 2 {0 485} (a) All assisted living facilities must offer to provide or make available at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) guidelines, including seasonal fresh fruit and fresh vegetables. The menus must be prepared at least one week in advance and made available to all residents. The facility must encourage residents' involvement in menu planning. Meal substitutions must be of similar nutritional value if a resident refuses a food that is served. Residents must be informed in advance of menu changes. The facility must not require a resident to include and pay for meals in the resident's contract. This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by: Not reviewed during this survey. {0 580} 144G.42 Subd. 2 Quality management {0 580} SS=F The facility shall engage in quality management appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided. "Quality management activity" means evaluating the quality of care by periodically reviewing resident services, complaints made, and other issues that have occurred and determining whether changes in services, staffing, or other procedures need to be made in order to ensure safe and competent services to residents. Documentation about quality management activity must be available for two years. Information about quality management must be available to the commissioner at the time STATE FORM 6899 JT8C12 If continuation sheet 3 of 12 PRINTED: 08/29/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ R B. WING _____________________________ 30353 07/21/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 5607 150TH STREET NORTH THE ENCORE AT HUGO HUGO, MN 55038 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) {0 580} Continued From page 3 {0 580} of the survey, investigation, or renewal. This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by: Not reviewed during this survey. {0 650} 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records {0 650} SS=D (a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. The records must include the following infomation: (1) evidence of current professional licensure, registration, or certification if licensure, registration, or certification is required by this chapter or rules; (2) records of orientation, required annual training and infection control training, and competency evaluations; (3) current job description, including qualifications, responsibilities, and identification of staff persons providing supervision; (4) documentation of annual performance reviews that identify areas of improvement needed and training needs; (5) for individuals providing assisted living services, verification that required health screenings under subdivision 9 have taken place and the dates of those screenings; and (6) documentation of the background study as required under section 144.057. This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by: Not reviewed during this survey. {0 775} 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical {0 775} SS=E environment STATE FORM 6899 JT8C12 If continuation sheet 4 of 12 PRINTED: 08/29/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ R B.
2025-01-22Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation was conducted at The Encore at Hugo on January 8, 2025, to review whether facility policies and practices complied with state laws governing assisted living facilities with dementia care. No correction orders were issued as a result of the investigation.
Full inspector notes
STATE LICENSING COMPLIANCE REPORT Report #: HL303531544C Date Concluded: January 22, 2025 Name, Address, and County of Facility Investigated: The Encore at Hugo 5607 150th St N, Hugo, MN 55038 Washington County Facility Type: Assisted Living Facility with Evaluator’s Name: Brandon Martfeld, RN Dementia Care (ALFDC) BSN, Special Investigator The Minnesota Department of Health conducted a complaint investigation to determine compliance with state laws and rules governing the provision of care under Minnesota Statutes, 144G (ALL). The purpose of this complaint investigation was to review if facility policies and practices comply with applicable laws and rules. No maltreatment under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 626 was alleged. To view a copy of the correction orders, if any, please visit: https://www.health.state.mn.us/facilities/regulation/directory/provcompselect.html, or call website, please see the attached state form. PRINTED: 01/22/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 30353 01/08/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 5607 150TH STREET NORTH THE ENCORE AT HUGO HUGO, MN 55038 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 On January 8, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health initiated an investigation of complaint #HL303531544C. No correction orders are issued. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 UE7I11 If continuation sheet 1 of 1
2024-01-11Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
The Minnesota Department of Health investigated a complaint that an unlicensed staff member yelled at and restrained a resident by locking the resident's wheelchair during a night shift incident. The investigation was inconclusive because staff and the alleged staff member gave conflicting accounts of what happened, and no video footage was available to clarify the facts, though the facility assessed the resident the next morning and found no visible injuries. The facility placed the staff member on administrative leave and terminated their employment following an internal investigation, and the resident's family reported being kept informed and having no further concerns about care.
Full inspector notes
Finding: Inconclusive Nature of Visit: The Minnesota Department of Health investigated an allegation of maltreatment, in accordance with the Minnesota Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act, Minn. Stat. 626.557, and to evaluate compliance with applicable licensing standards for the provider type. Allegation(s): An unlicensed staff member/alleged perpetrator (AP) abused the resident when the AP reprimanded and restrained the resident for being uncooperative. Investigative Findings and Conclusion: The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was inconclusive. Although an altercation occurred between the resident and the staff member/alleged perpetrator (AP), it is unable to be determined if abuse occurred as conflicting accounts of the incident were provided. The investigator conducted interviews with members of the facility nursing staff, agency staff personnel, and the resident’s family. The investigation included review of the resident’s medical record, facility staffing schedules, personnel files, policies and procedures, grievances, and incident reports. At the time of the onsite visit, the investigator toured the facility and observed interactions between staff and residents. An equal opportunity employer. The resident resided in an assisted living facility memory care unit. The resident’s diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, cognitive communication deficits, and major depressive disorder. The resident’s service plan included medication administration, assistance with activities of daily living, and housekeeping. According to complaint documents, an incident occurred during the night shift between the resident and the AP. The AP was overheard yelling at the resident and restrained the resident by locking the resident’s wheelchair brakes, before forcefully pushing the resident back to their room. The next morning the incident was reported to facility management. Facility management placed the AP on administrative leave and initiated an internal investigation. During the internal investigation, the AP denied abusing the resident, however, the AP’s employment was terminated as a result of the investigation. No video camera footage was available to review from the night of the alleged incident. During an interview, a staff member who worked the night of the incident stated the AP appeared visibly upset and used a loud and angry tone of voice with the resident. The staff member stated that on two occasions that night, it appeared the AP restrained the resident when the AP locked the resident’s wheelchair brakes to restrict the resident’s movement. During an interview with a nurse at the facility, the nurse indicated she was informed of the incident the following morning and initiated an internal investigation. The nurse indicated the resident was assessed that morning and had no visible injury but confirmed the AP was terminated after completion of the internal investigation. During an interview, the AP admitted to using a loud tone of voice but denied restraining or verbally abusing the resident. During an interview with the resident’s family member, they stated the facility kept them well informed of the incident and they had no further concerns with the care or treatment provided by facility staff. At the time of the onsite visit, the resident was not available for interview. In conclusion, the Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was inconclusive. Inconclusive: Minnesota Statutes, section 626.5572, Subdivision 11. "Inconclusive" means there is less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur. Abuse: Minnesota Statutes section 626.5572, subdivision 2. "Abuse" means: (a) An act against a vulnerable adult that constitutes a violation of, an attempt to violate, or aiding and abetting a violation of: (1) assault in the first through fifth degrees as defined in sections 609.221 to 609.224; (2) the use of drugs to injure or facilitate crime as defined in section 609.235; (3) the solicitation, inducement, and promotion of prostitution as defined in section 609.322; and (4) criminal sexual conduct in the first through fifth degrees as defined in sections 609.342 to 609.3451. A violation includes any action that meets the elements of the crime, regardless of whether there is a criminal proceeding or conviction. (b) Conduct which is not an accident or therapeutic conduct as defined in this section, which produces or could reasonably be expected to produce physical pain or injury or emotional distress including, but not limited to, the following: (1) hitting, slapping, kicking, pinching, biting, or corporal punishment of a vulnerable adult; (2) use of repeated or malicious oral, written, or gestured language toward a vulnerable adult or the treatment of a vulnerable adult which would be considered by a reasonable person to be disparaging, derogatory, humiliating, harassing, or threatening; (3) use of any aversive or deprivation procedure, unreasonable confinement, or involuntary seclusion, including the forced separation of the vulnerable adult from other persons against the will of the vulnerable adult or the legal representative of the vulnerable adult; and (4) use of any aversive or deprivation procedures for persons with developmental disabilities or related conditions not authorized under section 245.825. (c) Any sexual contact or penetration as defined in section 609.341, between a facility staff person or a person providing services in the facility and a resident, patient, or client of that facility. (d) The act of forcing, compelling, coercing, or enticing a vulnerable adult against the vulnerable adult's will to perform services for the advantage of another. Vulnerable Adult interviewed: Unavailable for interview. Family/Responsible Party interviewed: Yes Alleged Perpetrator interviewed: Yes Action taken by facility: The facility immediately removed the AP from the schedule, completed an internal investigation, and reported the incident. The AP is no longer employed at the facility. Action taken by the Minnesota Department of Health: The facility was found to be in noncompliance. To view a copy of the Statement of Deficiencies and/or correction orders, please visit: https://www.health.state.mn.us/facilities/regulation/directory/provcompselect.html If you are viewing this report on the MDH website, please see the attached Statement of Deficiencies. You may also call 651-201-4200 to receive a copy via mail or email cc: The Office of Ombudsman for Long Term Care The Office of Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities PRINTED: 01/19/2024 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 30353 12/18/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 5607 150TH STREET NORTH THE ENCORE AT HUGO HUGO, MN 55038 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER CORRECTION The Minnesota Department of Health ORDER (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and an individual In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section person was responsible for the 144G.08 to 144G.95, these correction orders are maltreatment, in connection with incidents issued pursuant to a complaint investigation. which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for Determination of whether a violation is corrected details. requires compliance with all requirements provided at the statute number indicated below. Minnesota Department of Health is When a Minnesota Statute contains several documenting the State Correction Orders items, failure to comply with any of the items will using federal software. Tag numbers have be considered lack of compliance. been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The INITIAL COMMENTS: assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The #HL303535967C/#HL303538584M state Statute number and the corresponding text of the state Statute out On December 18, 2023, the Minnesota of compliance is listed in the "Summary Department of Health conducted a complaint Statement of Deficiencies" column. This investigation at the above provider, and the column also includes the findings which following correction orders are issued. At the time are in violation of the state requirement of the complaint investigation, there were 15 after the statement, "This Minnesota residents receiving services under the provider's requirement is not met as evidenced by." Assisted Living with Dementia Care license. Following the evaluators' findings is the Time Period for Correction. The following correction order is issued/orders are issued for #HL303535967C/#HL303538584M PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF tag identification 0620 and 2380. THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH STATES,"PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION." THIS APPLIES TO FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES.
1 older inspection from 2022 are not shown in the free view.
1 older inspection (2022–2023) are available with a premium membership.
Other facilities in Hugo.
Other memory care facilities near Hugo with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.