Vista Prairie at Goldfinch Est.
Vista Prairie at Goldfinch Est is Grade C, ranked in the top 48% of Minnesota memory care with 1 MDH citation on record; last inspected Dec 2024.

A large home, reviewed on public record.
Ranked against 138 Minnesota facilities.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better. Source: Minnesota Dept. of Health · Health Regulation Division.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Vista Prairie at Goldfinch Est has 1 citation on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
1 deficiencie on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
1 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Vista Prairie at Goldfinch Est's record and state requirements.
The most recent Minnesota Department of Health inspection on December 19, 2024 found zero deficiencies across all 140 licensed beds — can you walk us through your internal quality assurance process and show documentation of how you prepare for state inspections?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
MDH records show 2 complaints were filed during the inspection period on file — were either of those complaints substantiated by the state, and can you share your written response or corrective action documentation for any substantiated findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
As an Assisted Living Facility with Dementia Care licensed under Minn. Stat. ch. 144G, what written policies govern your dementia care program, and can families review those policies along with staff competency assessment records during a tour?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every MDH visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2025-02-14Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint was investigated after an unlicensed caregiver made two medication errors—first accidentally removing the wrong Ativan tablet from a bubble pack, then taping the wrong medication (Lasix) back into the pack when trying to correct the mistake—but no harm occurred to the resident. The Minnesota Department of Health determined the allegation of neglect was not substantiated because the errors were isolated mistakes with no resulting injury and the facility immediately took corrective action, including removing the caregiver from medication duties and educating staff on proper error reporting. The facility also notified the resident's physician and implemented additional safeguards.
Full inspector notes
Finding: Not Substantiated Nature of Investigation: The Minnesota Department of Health investigated an allegation of maltreatment, in accordance with the Minnesota Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act, Minn. Stat. 626.557, and to evaluate compliance with applicable licensing standards for the provider type. Initial Investigation Allegation(s): The alleged perpetrator (AP) neglected the resident by punching the wrong Lorazepam (Ativan) bubble pack, attempting to put it back, and accidentally inserting a different medication instead of Ativan. Investigative Findings and Conclusion: The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. The AP, who was an unlicensed caregiver whose duties included medication passing, made an error when he punched out Ativan by mistake. The AP then made an additional mistake when he attempted to put the medication back but put the wrong on in the bubble pack. No harm occurred to the resident and the error was isolated. The investigator conducted interviews with facility staff members, including administrative staff and nursing staff. The investigation included review of the resident’s records, internal investigation documentation, incident reports, personnel files, staff schedules, policies, and procedures. The resident resided in an assisted living secured memory care building. The resident’s diagnoses include dementia, restlessness and agitation. The resident’s service plan indicated the resident required assistance with medication management. The facility’s incident report indicated the nurse was informed a dose of as-needed Ativan had a piece of tape behind it in the as-needed medication bubble pack. Upon examination, the nurse found the medication taped in the bubble pack was not Ativan but Lasix. The resident’s physician order sheet indicated that the resident had an order for Ativan 0.5 milligrams (mg) twice a day and an additional Ativan 0.5 mg tablet once daily as needed for aggression, with a required interval of 4-6 hours between scheduled doses. During an interview, a manager stated that the incident was reported to the nurse after it was noticed that the resident’s as-needed Ativan pill in the bubble pack did not look the same as the other pills and an internal investigation was initiated during which the AP was interviewed. The AP said he accidentally taken the as-needed Ativan instead of the scheduled Ativan. Upon realizing the mistake, he attempted to put the medication back and taped it to the back of the pack. However, the medication he put back was Lasix, not Ativan. A comparison of the pills found they looked in color and shape, both being round and white. Subsequently, the facility provided the AP a corrective action and re-assigned to duties which did not include medication passes. All staff members were educated on the importance of reporting medication errors to the nurse immediately, and a sign was posted as a reminder. During an interview, the nurse stated controlled medications [such as Ativan] medications were stored in a locked drawer in the med cart, with both PRN and scheduled medications stored together, making it possible to mistake one for the other. In conclusion, the Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. “Not Substantiated” means: An investigatory conclusion indicating the preponderance of evidence shows that an act meeting the definition of maltreatment did not occur. Neglect: Minnesota Statutes, section 626.5572, subdivision 17 “Neglect” means neglect by a caregiver or self-neglect. (a) "Caregiver neglect" means the failure or omission by a caregiver to supply a vulnerable adult with care or services, including but not limited to, food, clothing, shelter, health care, or supervision which is: (1) reasonable and necessary to obtain or maintain the vulnerable adult's physical or mental health or safety, considering the physical and mental capacity or dysfunction of the vulnerable adult; and (2) which is not the result of an accident or therapeutic conduct. (d) For purposes of this section, a vulnerable adult is not neglected for the sole reason that: (4) an individual makes an error in the provision of therapeutic conduct to a vulnerable adult which does not result in injury or harm which reasonably requires medical or mental health care; or (5) an individual makes an error in the provision of therapeutic conduct to a vulnerable adult that results in injury or harm, which reasonably requires the care of a physician, and: (i) the necessary care is provided in a timely fashion as dictated by the condition of the vulnerable adult; (ii) if after receiving care, the health status of the vulnerable adult can be reasonably expected, as determined by the attending physician, to be restored to the vulnerable adult's preexisting condition; (iii) the error is not part of a pattern of errors by the individual; (iv) if in a facility, the error is immediately reported as required under section 626.557, and recorded internally in the facility; (v) if in a facility, the facility identifies and takes corrective action and implements measures designed to reduce the risk of further occurrence of this error and similar errors; and (vi) if in a facility, the actions required under items (iv) and (v) are sufficiently documented for review and evaluation by the facility and any applicable licensing, certification, and ombudsman agency. Vulnerable Adult interviewed: No, due to cognitive loss Family/Responsible Party interviewed: No. attempts were not successful. Alleged Perpetrator interviewed: No; attempts were not successful. Action taken by facility: The facility initiated an internal investigation. The resident was assessed, and the physician was notified. Staff education was provided, and the AP was removed from medication cart duty. Action taken by the Minnesota Department of Health: No further action taken at this time. cc: The Office of Ombudsman for Long Term Care The Office of Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities PRINTED: 02/18/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 30399 01/21/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 850 GOLDFINCH STREET VISTA PRAIRIE AT GOLDFINCH ESTATES FAIRMONT, MN 56031 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 On Jan 21, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health initiated an investigation of complaints #HL303998042M/ HL303994101C. No correction orders are issued. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 1KLY11 If continuation sheet 1 of 1
2024-12-19Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection was conducted at Vista Prairie at Goldfinch Estates from December 16 through 19, 2024, at which time the facility had 124 residents, with 118 receiving services under the Assisted Living Facility with Dementia Care license. State correction orders were issued for violations of Minnesota statutes; no immediate fines were assessed. The facility must document the actions taken to correct the violations within the time periods specified on the state form.
Full inspector notes
correction orders and document the actions taken to comply in the facility's records. The Department reserves the right to return to the facility at any time should the Department receive a complaint or deem it necessary to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of residents in your care. STATE CORRECTION ORDERS The enclosed State Form documents the state correction orders. MDH documents state licensing correction orders using federal software. Tag numbers are assigned to Minnesota state statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state statute number and the corresponding text of the state statute out of compliance are listed in the "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" column. This column also includes the findings that are in violation of the state statute after the statement, "This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by . . ." In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.31 Subd. 4, MDH may assess fines based on the level and scope of the violations; h owever, no immediate fines are assessed for this survey of your facility. DOCUMENTATION OF ACTION TO COMPLY In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.30, Subd. 5(c), the licensee must document actions taken to comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. The correction order documentation should include the following: An equal opportunity employer. Letter ID: IS7N REVISED 09/13/2021 Vista Prairie At Goldfinch Estates February 10, 2025 Page 2 Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected related to the resident(s)/employee(s) identified in the correction order. Identify how the area(s) of noncompliance was corrected for all of the provider’s resident(s)/employees that may be affected by the noncompliance. Identify what changes to your systems and practices were made to ensure compliance with the specific statute(s). CORRECTION ORDER RECONSIDERATION PROCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.32, Subd. 2, you may challenge the correction order(s) issued, including the level and scope, and any fine assessed through the correction order reconsideration process. The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. To submit a reconsideration request, please visit: https://forms.web.health.state.mn.us/form/HRDAppealsForm The MDH Health Regulation Division (HRD) values your feedback about your experience during the survey and/or investigation process. Please fill out this anonymous provider feedback questionnaire at your convenience at this link: h ttps://forms.office.com/g/Bm5uQEpHVa. Your input is important to us and will enable MDH to improve its processes and communication with providers. If you have any questions regarding the questionnaire, please contact Susan Winkelmann at susan.winkelmann@state.mn.us or call 651-201-5952. You are encouraged to retain this document for your records. It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and state form with your organization’s Governing Body. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jodi Johnson, Supervisor State Evaluation Team Email: jodi.johnson@state.mn.us Telephone: 507-344-2730 Fax: 1 -866-890-9290 JMD PRINTED: 02/10/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 30399 12/19/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 850 GOLDFINCH STREET VISTA PRAIRIE AT GOLDFINCH ESTATES FAIRMONT, MN 56031 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING Minnesota Department of Health is CORRECTION ORDER(S) documenting the State Correction Orders using federal software. Tag numbers have In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section been assigned to Minnesota State 144G.08 to 144G.95, these correction orders are Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The issued pursuant to a survey. assigned tag number appears in the far-left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The Determination of whether violations are corrected state Statute number and the requires compliance with all requirements corresponding text of the state Statute out provided at the Statute number indicated below. of compliance is listed in the "Summary When Minnesota Statute contains several items, Statement of Deficiencies" column. This failure to comply with any of the items will be column also includes the findings which considered lack of compliance. are in violation of the state requirement after the statement, "This Minnesota INITIAL COMMENTS: requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the evaluators ' findings is the SL30399016-0 Time Period for Correction. PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF On December 16, 2024, through December 19, THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH 2024, the Minnesota Department of Health STATES,"PROVIDER'S PLAN OF conducted a full survey at the above provider. At CORRECTION." THIS APPLIES TO the time of the survey, there were 124 residents; FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS 118 receiving services under the Assisted Living WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. Facility with Dementia Care license. THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES. THE LETTER IN THE LEFT COLUMN IS USED FOR TRACKING PURPOSES AND REFLECTS THE SCOPE AND LEVEL ISSUED PURSUANT TO 144G.31 SUBDIVISION 1-3. 0 480 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum 0 480 SS=F requirements; required food services (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 574111 If continuation sheet 1 of 17 PRINTED: 02/10/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 30399 12/19/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 850 GOLDFINCH STREET VISTA PRAIRIE AT GOLDFINCH ESTATES FAIRMONT, MN 56031 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 480 Continued From page 1 0 480 4626. (b) For an assisted living facility with a licensed capacity of ten or fewer residents: (1) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.0033, item A, the facility may share a certified food protection manager (CFPM) with one other facility located within a 60-mile radius and under common management provided the CFPM is present at each facility frequently enough to effectively administer, manage, and supervise each facility's food service operation; (2) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.0545, item A, kick plates that are not removable or cannot be rotated open are allowed unless the facility has been issued repeated correction orders for violations of Minnesota Rules, part 4626.1565 or 4626.1570; (3) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.0685, item A, the facility is not required to provide integral drainboards, utensil racks, or tables large enough to accommodate soiled and clean items that may accumulate during hours of operation provided soiled items do not contaminate clean items, surfaces, or food, and clean equipment and dishes are air dried in a manner that prevents contamination before storage; (4) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626.1070, item A, the facility is not required to install a dedicated handwashing sink in its existing kitchen provided it designates one well of a two-compartment sink for use only as a handwashing sink; (5) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, parts 4626.1325, 4626.1335, and 4626.1360, item A, existing floor, wall, and ceiling finishes are allowed provided the facility keeps them clean and in good condition; (6) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part STATE FORM 6899 574111 If continuation sheet 2 of 17 PRINTED: 02/10/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 30399 12/19/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 850 GOLDFINCH STREET VISTA PRAIRIE AT GOLDFINCH ESTATES FAIRMONT, MN 56031 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 480 Continued From page 2 0 480 4626.
2023-12-22Complaint Investigation1 · Substantiated Finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation substantiated that a staff member gave a resident a cold shower against the resident's preference and recorded the resident on social media without permission; the resident's service plan specified preference for warm showers, and the resident was heard screaming during the incident. The staff member admitted to the actions and later resigned. The Minnesota Department of Health determined this constituted abuse under state law.
“MDH substantiated maltreatment or licensing violation finding”
Full inspector notes
Finding: Substantiated, individual responsibility Nature of the Investigation: The Minnesota Department of Health investigated an allegation of maltreatment, in accordance with the Minnesota Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act, Minn. Stat. 626.557, and to evaluate compliance with applicable licensing standards for the provider type. Initial Investigation Allegation(s): The alleged perpetrator (AP) abused the resident when she gave the resident a cold shower, prompting her to react vocally, and she recorded the resident's reaction on Snapchat. Investigative Findings and Conclusion: The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was substantiated. The AP was responsible for the maltreatment. The AP gave the resident a shower which included exposure to cold water and recorded the resident on Snapchat (a social media platform). The investigator conducted interviews with facility staff members, including administrative staff, and unlicensed staff. The investigator contacted the resident's family member. The investigation included review of resident's records, the AP’s personnel record, facility's policies and procedures, incident reports. The investigation included an onsite visit, observations, and interactions between residents and facility staff. An equal opportunity employer. The resident resided in an assisted living secured memory care building. The resident’s diagnoses include intellectual disabilities and depression. The resident’s service plan included assistance with all activities of daily living which included hygiene, dressing, toileting, medications, meals, and housekeeping. The service plan also included the resident preferred warm showers. The facility internal investigation documents indicated a staff member reported the AP played a Snapchat audio recording. The same documents indicated the staff member said the resident could be heard in the recording screaming “Stop that, [AP’s name]”. The AP told the staff member she turned the water to cold and gave the resident a cold shower. The facility internal investigation documents included notes from an interview with the AP. These notes indicated the AP admitted to recording the AP during the cold shower and the resident told her to stop. The AP stated she thought it was a joke to do this with the resident. The AP claimed she was turning the water off when it transitioned from warm to cold and acknowledged she recorded the resident on social media. During an interview, the staff member stated the AP told her she had a recording of the resident screaming when she turned the warm water to cold water temperature during her shower. The staff member stated the AP found it amusing and recorded the resident and that the AP laughed about it while relating the story. The staff member stated later the resident was terrified to receive a shower because of what had happened. During an interview, a management staff stated a staff member reported to her the AP gave a cold shower to a resident and recorded audio of the incident on Snapchat. She stated she spoke to the AP, who admitted to recording the audio while giving the resident a cold shower. Following the investigation, the AP resigned and declined further discussion with the management team. During the investigation, the attempts to interview the AP were unsuccessful. In conclusion, the Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was substantiated. Substantiated: Minnesota Statutes, section 626.5572, Subdivision 19. “Substantiated” means a preponderance of evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred. Physical Abuse: Minnesota Statutes, section 260E.03, Subd. 18 "Physical abuse" means any physical injury, mental injury under subdivision 13, or threatened injury under subdivision 23, inflicted by a person responsible for the child's care on a child other than by accidental means, or any physical or mental injury that cannot reasonably be explained by the child's history of injuries, or any aversive or deprivation procedures, or regulated interventions, that have not been authorized under section 125A.0942 or 245.825. (b) Abuse does not include reasonable and moderate physical discipline of a child administered by a parent or legal guardian that does not result in an injury. Abuse does not include the use of reasonable force by a teacher, principal, or school employee as allowed by section 121A.582. (c) For the purposes of this subdivision, actions that are not reasonable and moderate include, but are not limited to, any of the following: (1) throwing, kicking, burning, biting, or cutting a child; (2) striking a child with a closed fist; (3) shaking a child under age three; (4) striking or other actions that result in any nonaccidental injury to a child under 18 months of age; (5) unreasonable interference with a child's breathing; (6) threatening a child with a weapon, as defined in section 609.02, subdivision 6; (7) striking a child under age one on the face or head; (8) striking a child who is at least age one but under age four on the face or head, which results in an injury; (9) purposely giving a child: (i) poison, alcohol, or dangerous, harmful, or controlled substances that were not prescribed for the child by a practitioner in order to control or punish the child; or (ii) other substances that substantially affect the child's behavior, motor coordination, or judgment; that result in sickness or internal injury; or that subject the child to medical procedures that would be unnecessary if the child were not exposed to the substances. (10) unreasonable physical confinement or restraint not permitted under section 609.379, including but not limited to tying, caging, or chaining. Vulnerable Adult interviewed: No. Family/Responsible Party interviewed: No, attempts to interview unsuccessful Alleged Perpetrator interviewed: No, attempts to interview unsuccessful Action taken by facility: The facility initiated an internal investigation, suspended the AP, and updated the resident’s service plan. The AP resigned. Action taken by the Minnesota Department of Health: The facility was issued a correction order regarding the vulnerable adult’s right to be free from maltreatment. You may also call 651-201-4200 to receive a copy via mail or email. The responsible party will be notified of their right to appeal the maltreatment finding. If the maltreatment is substantiated against an identified employee, this report will be submitted to the nurse aide registry for possible inclusion of the finding on the abuse registry and/or to the Minnesota Department of Human Services for possible disqualification in accordance with the provisions of the background study requirements under Minnesota 245C. cc: The Office of Ombudsman for Long Term Care The Office of Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Martin County Attorney Fairmont City Attorney Fairmont Police Department Minnesota Department of Human Services PRINTED: 12/26/2023 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 30399 11/14/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 850 GOLDFINCH STREET VISTA PRAIRIE AT GOLDFINCH ESTATES FAIRMONT, MN 56031 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 On November 14, 2023, the Minnesota Department of Health initiated an investigation of complaint HL303996043M/HL303991205C. The following correction order is issued, tag identification 2360. 02360 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment 02360 Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act. This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by: The facility failed to ensure one of one resident No plan of correction is required for this reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment. tag. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and an individual alleged perpetrator was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 QGQE11 If continuation sheet 1 of 1
Other facilities in Fairmont.
Other memory care facilities near Fairmont with similar care offerings.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
No published reviews yet. Use the button above to share your experience.
