The Meadows.
The Meadows is Ranked in the top 1% of Minnesota memory care with no MDH citations on record; last inspected Feb 2026.
A medium home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 187 Minnesota facilities with a similar number of beds.
ALF memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Minnesota Dept. of Health · Health Regulation Division.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month MDH inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Be first to know if The Meadows's inspection record changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
No citations in the last 36 months.
Finding distribution
none · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to The Meadows's record and state requirements.
The most recent inspection on February 27, 2026 resulted in zero deficiencies — can you walk us through how staff document daily dementia care activities, and may we see a sample of those records to understand what oversight looks like when inspectors return?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Two complaints have been filed with the Minnesota Department of Health during the period on file — were either of those complaints substantiated, and what corrective steps did the facility take in response?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Minnesota Statute chapter 144G requires facilities with dementia care licensure to maintain written policies on resident supervision and wandering prevention — can you provide us with a copy of those policies and explain how staff are trained on them?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
3 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-02-27Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A routine inspection of The Meadows was conducted February 23–27, 2026, and state correction orders were issued for violations of Minnesota Statutes chapter 144G. The inspection identified noncompliance with minimum food service requirements under Minnesota Statute 144G.41, Subdivision 1. The facility must document actions taken to correct this violation within the timeframe specified on the state form and may request reconsideration of the correction order within 15 calendar days of receipt.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
correction orders and document the actions taken to comply in the facility's records. The Department reserves the right to return to the facility at any time should the Department receive a complaint or deem it necessary to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of residents in your care. STATE CORRECTIO NORDERS The enclosed State Form documents the state correction orders. MDH documents state licensing correction orders using federal software. Tag numbers are assigned to Minnesota state statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The assigned tag number appears in the far left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag." The state statute number and the corresponding text of the state statute out of compliance are listed in the "Summary Statement of Deficiencies" column. This column also includes the findings that are in violation of the state statute after the statement, "This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by . . ." DOCUMENTATIO ONF ACTION TO COMPLY In accorda nce with Min n. Stat. § 144G.30, Sub d. 5(c), th e lic ens ee mus t docum ent ac tions taken t o comply with the correction orders within the time period outlined on the state form; however, plans of correction are not required to be submitted for approval. The correction order documentation should include the following: Identify how the area( s) of noncompliance was corrected related to the · resident( s)/ employee( s) identified in the correction order. Identify how the area( s) of noncompliance was corrected for all of the provider’s · An equal opportunity employer. Letter ID: IS7N REVISE D09/13/2021 The Meadows March 20, 2026 Page 2 resident( s)/ employees that may be affected by the noncompliance. Identify what changes to your systems and practices were made to ensure compliance with · the specific statute( s). CORRECTIO NORDER RECONSIDERATIO PNROCESS In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 144G.32, Subd. 2, you may challenge the correction order( s) issued, including the level and scope, and any fine assessed through the correction order reconsideration process. The request for reconsideration must be in writing and received by MDH within 15 calendar days of the correction order receipt date. To submit a reconsideration request, please visit: https: / / forms. web. health. state. mn. us/ form/ HRDAppealsForm The MDH Health Regulation Division (HRD )values your feedback about your experience during the survey and/ or investigation process. Please fill out this anonymous provider feedback questionnaire at your conv enien ce at thi s link: https: / / forms. office.com/ g/ Bm5uQEpHVa. Your inpu t is import ant to us and will enable MDH to improve its processes and communication with providers. If you have any questions regarding the questionnaire, please contact Susan Winkelmann at susan. winkelmann@state. mn.us or call 651-201-5952. You are encouraged to retain this document for your records. It is your responsibility to share the information contained in the letter and state form with your organization’s Governing Body. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jodi Johnson, Supervisor State Evaluation Team Email: Jodi.Johnson@state. mn.us Telephone: 507-344-2730 Fax: 1-866-890-9290 HHH PRINTED: 03/ 20/ 2026 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/ SUPPLIER/ CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 32452 02/ 27/ 2026 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 1761 EAGLE VIEW CIRCLE THE MEADOWS ALBERT LEA, MN 56007 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER' S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS- REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 *****ATTENTION***** Minnesota Department of Health is documenting the State Correction Orders ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER LICENSING using federal software. Tag numbers have CORRECTION ORDER( S) been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities. The In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section assigned tag number appears in the 144G. 08 to 144G. 95, these correction orders are far-left column entitled "ID Prefix Tag. " The issued pursuant to a survey. state Statute number and the corresponding text of the state Statute out Determination of whether violations are corrected of compliance is listed in the "Summary requires compliance with all requirements Statement of Deficiencies" column. This provided at the Statute number indicated below. column also includes the findings which When Minnesota Statute contains several items, are in violation of the state requirement failure to comply with any of the items will be after the statement, "This Minnesota considered lack of compliance. requirement is not met as evidenced by." Following the evaluators' findings is the INITIAL COMMENTS: Time Period for Correction. SL32452016- 0 PLEASE DISREGARD THE HEADING OF THE FOURTH COLUMN WHICH On February 23, 2026, through February 27, STATES, "PROVIDER' S PLAN OF 2026, the Minnesota Department of Health CORRECTION. " THIS APPLIES TO conducted a full survey at the above provider and FEDERAL DEFICIENCIES ONLY. THIS the following correction orders are issued. At the WILL APPEAR ON EACH PAGE. time of the survey, there were 28 residents; 28 receiving services under the Assisted Living THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO Facility with Dementia Care license. SUBMIT A PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES. THE LETTER IN THE LEFT COLUMN IS USED FOR TRACKING PURPOSES AND REFLECTS THE SCOPE AND LEVEL ISSUED PURSUANT TO 144G. 31 SUBDIVISION 1-3. 0 480 144G. 41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum 0 480 SS= F requirements; required food services LABORATORY DIRECTOR' S OR PROVIDER/ SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE' S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 62ZD11 If continuation sheet 1 of 23 PRINTED: 03/ 20/ 2026 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/ SUPPLIER/ CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B. WING _____________________________ 32452 02/ 27/ 2026 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 1761 EAGLE VIEW CIRCLE THE MEADOWS ALBERT LEA, MN 56007 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER' S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS- REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 480 Continued From page 1 0 480 (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. (b) For an assisted living facility with a licensed capacity of ten or fewer residents: (1) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626. 0033, item A, the facility may share a certified food protection manager (CFPM) with one other facility located within a 60- mile radius and under common management provided the CFPM is present at each facility frequently enough to effectively administer, manage, and supervise each facility's food service operation; (2) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626. 0545, item A, kick plates that are not removable or cannot be rotated open are allowed unless the facility has been issued repeated correction orders for violations of Minnesota Rules, part 4626. 1565 or 4626. 1570; (3) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626. 0685, item A, the facility is not required to provide integral drainboards, utensil racks, or tables large enough to accommodate soiled and clean items that may accumulate during hours of operation provided soiled items do not contaminate clean items, surfaces, or food, and clean equipment and dishes are air dried in a manner that prevents contamination before storage; (4) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 4626. 1070, item A, the facility is not required to install a dedicated handwashing sink in its existing kitchen provided it designates one well of a two-compartment sink for use only as a handwashing sink; (5) notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, parts 4626. 1325, 4626. 1335, and 4626. 1360, item A, existing floor, wall, and ceiling finishes are STATE FORM 6899 62ZD11 If continuation sheet 2 of 23 PRINTED: 03/ 20/ 2026 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/ SUPPLIER/ CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ B.
2025-10-17Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that emotional abuse was not substantiated when a staff member became impatient and said "no" to a resident during a shower after the resident pinched and spat at the staff member. Video footage, staff interviews, and observations showed the resident did not appear distressed or fearful, and the facility took action by suspending and then terminating the staff member's employment and providing dementia care training to staff.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Finding: Not Substantiated Nature of Investigation: The Minnesota Department of Health investigated an allegation of maltreatment, in accordance with the Minnesota Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act, Minn. Stat. 626.557, and to evaluate compliance with applicable licensing standards for the provider type. Initial Investigation Allegation(s): The alleged perpetrator (AP) emotionally abused the resident when the AP became hostile, impatient, derogatory, and yelled at the resident during a shower. Investigative Findings and Conclusion: The Minnesota Department of Health determined emotional abuse was not substantiated. There was not a preponderance of evidence to support the AP’s actions rose to the level to of threatening, harassing or disparaging with emotional distress. The investigator conducted interviews with facility staff members, including administrative staff, nursing staff, and unlicensed staff. The investigation included review of the resident records, video footage, facility internal investigation, facility incident reports, personnel files, staff schedules, and related facility policy and procedures. Also, the investigator observed staff and resident interactions. The resident resided in an assisted living memory care unit. The resident’s diagnoses included dementia and anxiety. The resident’s service plan included assistance with dressing and bathing. The resident’s assessment indicated the resident was cognitively impaired and had behaviors that included being resistive to cares, verbally aggressive, physically aggressive, inappropriate sexual behavior, angry outburst, and cursing/swearing. The resident’s assessment indicated staff were to remind the resident that the behaviors were not appropriate. The resident’s assessment indicated the resident required one staff for assistance with bathing and dressing. In a series of 10 videos ranging from 15 seconds to two minutes and 15 seconds, a staff member and the AP could be seen in the resident’s room. A staff member removed the resident’s sheets and blankets and made the resident’s bed while the AP completed the resident’s shower. At times during the videos the bathroom door was slightly open and at times the bathroom door was completely closed due to the staff member and AP entering and exiting the bathroom. The AP and resident could be heard on the videos as the AP assists the resident with a shower. The AP told the resident to close her eyes and tilt her head back so that the shampoo could be rinsed out. The resident made numerus inaudible words/noise, and the AP could be heard saying no to the resident multiple times including a statement the resident threw her washcloth. After the resident’s shower, the AP came out of the bathroom and told the staff member, “she pinched my boob” and “spit in my face” while the AP wiped her face with a towel. The end of the videos showed the staff member and the AP assisting the resident with getting dressed, brushing her hair, and escorting the resident out of the room. The videos showed the resident did not appear to be distraught, fearful or in emotional distress. During an interview, unlicensed staff member stated the AP started giving the resident a shower. The resident did not like water on her and would say the water was usually too cold or too hot. During the shower, the resident splashed water and pinched the AP. After the shower, the resident was assisted with getting dressed and brought out to a common area. During an interview, the AP stated during the shower the bathroom door was closed for privacy. During the shower the resident was kicking at her and the resident was told no, do not do that. The AP also stated the resident spit in her face. During the shower, the resident was also given a washcloth to cover her eyes so that shampoo would not get into her eyes, but the resident had thrown the washcloth. The AP stated after the shower, the resident was dressed in her pajamas and assisted out to the living room. During an interview, facility leadership stated the resident had cognitive decline due to dementia and would often strike out, hit, or pinch staff. The resident did not like showers because she did not like the water going over her eyes. After the incident staff was educated regarding working with residents with dementia and audits were completed during resident cares. In conclusion, the Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was not substantiated. “Not Substantiated” means: An investigatory conclusion indicating the preponderance of evidence shows that an act meeting the definition of maltreatment did not occur. Abuse: Minnesota Statutes section 626.5572, subdivision 2. "Abuse" means: … (b) Conduct which is not an accident or therapeutic conduct as defined in this section, which produces or could reasonably be expected to produce physical pain or injury or emotional distress including, but not limited to, the following: (1) hitting, slapping, kicking, pinching, biting, or corporal punishment of a vulnerable adult; (2) use of repeated or malicious oral, written, or gestured language toward a vulnerable adult or the treatment of a vulnerable adult which would be considered by a reasonable person to be disparaging, derogatory, humiliating, harassing, or threatening. Vulnerable Adult interviewed: Yes. Family/Responsible Party interviewed: Yes. Alleged Perpetrator interviewed: Yes. the Action taken by facility: The facility suspended the AP pending an investigation, provided education to staff regarding working with resident’s with dementia and completed audits for the resident cares. The AP is no longer employed by the facility. Action taken by the Minnesota Department of Health: No further action taken at this time cc: The Office of Ombudsman for Long Term Care The Office of Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities PRINTED: 10/20/2025 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C B. WING _____________________________ 32452 09/08/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 1761 EAGLE VIEW CIRCLE THE MEADOWS ALBERT LEA, MN 56007 SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X4) ID ID (X5) (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE PREFIX PREFIX REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE TAG TAG DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 On September 8, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health initiated an investigation of complaint HL324524782M/HL324529928C. No correction orders are issued. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 OWC511 If continuation sheet 1 of 1
2024-03-06Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
On March 5, 2024, the Minnesota Department of Health investigated a complaint at The Meadows in Albert Lea. No violations were found and no correction orders were issued.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
PRINTED: 03/14/2024 FORM APPROVED STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION (X3) DATE SURVEY AND PLAN OF CORRECTION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPLETED A. BUILDING: ______________________ C 32452 B. WING _____________________________ 03/05/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE 1761 EAGLE VIEW CIRCLE THE MEADOWS ALBERT LEA, MN 56007 (X4) ID SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES ID PROVIDER'S PLAN OF CORRECTION (X5) PREFIX (EACH DEFICIENCY MUST BE PRECEDED BY FULL PREFIX (EACH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE COMPLETE TAG REGULATORY OR LSC IDENTIFYING INFORMATION) TAG CROSS-REFERENCED TO THE APPROPRIATE DATE DEFICIENCY) 0 000 Initial Comments 0 000 On March 5, 2024, the Minnesota Department of Health initiated an investigation of complaint #HL324524485C/#HL324527685M. No correction orders are issued. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE STATE FORM 6899 CTC111 If continuation sheet 1 of 1
1 older inspection from 2023 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Albert Lea.
Other memory care facilities near Albert Lea with similar care offerings.
Free · Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience


