Juniper Village at Louisville
2 CDPHE citations on record, last inspected Jan 2026, license 23033N.
Juniper Village at Louisville has 2 CDPHE citations on record; last inspected Jan 2026.
Memory-care basis not yet recorded from the state file.
Source: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
CDPHE recordLast inspection January 13, 2026
A large home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 70 Colorado facilities.
Assisted living memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment.
on file.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDPHE inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
2 total · 36 monthsCDPHE Level A–E
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
CDPHE licenses assisted living residences. A secure environment for residents who need one is optional under Chapter 7, Part 25. CDPHE does not publish a facility-level list of homes that have that option, so this page does not call the home state-verified memory care.
Ask on tour
“Ask whether the home has a secure environment, and ask to see the part of the license that says so.”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Juniper Village at Louisville's record and state requirements.
CDPHE records show 16 inspection reports on file with 15 deficiencies cited — can you walk us through the most common deficiency themes found during those inspections and show us the corrective action plans the facility submitted in response?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Five of the deficiencies on file were classified as serious (severity level 3 or 4) — can you provide documentation showing how those serious citations were resolved and what changes were made to prevent recurrence?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Nine complaints were filed with CDPHE during the inspection period on file — were any of those complaints substantiated, and can you share the facility's written response or remediation steps for any substantiated findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
From this home's file.
Counts and lines from the state file we hold.
- Does Juniper Village at Louisville provide memory care?
Memory-care basis not yet recorded from the state file.
- When was Juniper Village at Louisville last inspected?
Juniper Village at Louisville was last inspected on January 13, 2026. That visit is a complaint investigation.
- Has Juniper Village at Louisville been cited by CDPHE?
Yes. Juniper Village at Louisville has 2 deficiencies from CDPHE in the last three years. None are tagged immediate jeopardy.
- How many citations does Juniper Village at Louisville have?
Juniper Village at Louisville has 2 deficiencies across 10 inspections in the last three years. None are tagged immediate jeopardy.
- Who licenses Juniper Village at Louisville?
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment licenses Juniper Village at Louisville. The license number is 23033N. State record: https://cdphe.colorado.gov/health-facilities/find-and-compare-facilities
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
10 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2026-01-13Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
This complaint investigation is in the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment public file. No citation text was included for this visit.
2025-05-19Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
This complaint investigation is in the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment public file. No citation text was included for this visit.
2024-12-30Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
This complaint investigation is in the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment public file. No citation text was included for this visit.
2024-12-30Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A revisit inspection was completed on December 30, 2024, to follow up on a deficiency found during a previous survey on September 4, 2024. The residence was found to be in compliance with all regulations surveyed. No violations were confirmed.
2024-12-30Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A revisit inspection on December 30, 2024 checked whether the facility had corrected a deficiency found on September 4, 2024. The facility was found to be in compliance with all regulations surveyed.
2024-10-24Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
This complaint investigation is in the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment public file. No citation text was included for this visit.
2024-09-04Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A revisit inspection was completed on September 4, 2024 to check whether deficiencies found during a previous inspection on September 7, 2023 had been corrected, and at least one deficiency was still cited. New regulations for assisted living residences took effect on July 1, 2024, which may have affected the standards applied during this revisit.
2024-09-04Annual Compliance VisitLevel D · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A revisit inspection on September 4, 2024 found that the residence failed to update fall prevention plans for two residents after they experienced multiple falls between late August and early September 2024. One resident had five falls in six days, including injuries such as a skin tear to the elbow and fractures to multiple ribs and the forearm; another resident had four falls in five days, including a head injury that required an emergency department visit. The residence's policies required care plan updates when residents experienced changes in condition, but staff did not document individualized fall prevention approaches in response to these incidents.
Read full citation text (1)Hide full citation text
“Based on observation, interview, and record review the residence failed to detail in each resident's care plan the individualized approach necessary to address fall risk, affecting two of three sample residents (#20 and #21). Chapter 7 regulations governing assisted living residences, requires in part 12.15 that "The assisted living residence shall develop policies and procedures to establish a fall management program. The program shall include the following: B) Detailing in each resident ' s care plan the individualized approach necessary to address fall risk related to deficits in strength, balance, and eyesight, or effects of medication as identified during the comprehensive resident assessment ..." Specifically, from 8/25/24 through 8/30/24, Resident #21 experienced five falls in six days in which the residence failed to update the care plan for Resident #21 to include individualized approaches necessary to address fall risks. On 8/26/24 Resident #21 had a fall which resulted in a skin tear to the left elbow. On 8/30/24 Resident #21 had a fall which resulted in a closed fracture of multiple ribs on the left side and fracture of the right ulna.Specifically, from 8/30/24 through 9/4/24, Resident #20 experienced four falls in which the residence failed to update the care plan for Resident #20 to include individualized approaches necessary to address fall risks. Additionally, on 9/1/24 Resident #20 fell and had an abrasion on the back of his head which resulted in a visit to the emergency department. Findings include:1. Residence PolicyThe residence's Wellness Services Manual: Care Planning Assessment policy, undated, read in part: "When a resident has a change in behavior, cognition, discharge status, communication, ancillary service, need, etc. The Social Service Representative is responsible to change the care plan to match the current functioning and plan for the resident."2. Observations On 9/4/24 at 9:11 a.m., Resident #21 was seated in the residence's common area. The resident was in his walker chair hunched over with dried blood on his lip and a cast on his right arm. The resident was not able to answer questions due to cognitive impairment. 3. Record ReviewResident #21 was admitted to the residence on 6/17/24 with a diagnosis of severe unspecified dementia. The care plan for Resident #21, dated 6/13/24, read in part: The resident requires two person transfer assistance and an escort to/from meals/activities. However, the residence failed to update the care plan after his falls on 8/25, 8/26, 8/29, and 8/30/24, to detail individualized approaches necessary to address fall risks.A progress note, dated 8/25/24, read in part: Resident #21 was found sitting on his left side/hip in the grass. His wheeled walker was standing nearby. His shoes were off and nearby. A visitor wasstanding nearby him. He reported to the staff that he lost his balance and fell.A progress note, dated 8/26/24, read in part: residence staff observed Resident #21 on the floor for an unknown amount of time. The residence noted a skin tear to the left elbow.A fall assessment, dated 8/28/24, read in part: Resident #21 had balance problems while standing/walking and required the use of assistive devices.A progress note, dated 8/29/24, read in part: Residence staff observed Resident #21 on the floor next to his bed, and notified the nurse.A progress note, dated 8/30/24 at 9:47 a.m., read in part: residence staff observed Resident #21 kneeling on the floor next to his bed. Resident #21 had a swollen painful right elbow and a one centimeter skin laceration on his left elbow.A progress note, dated 8/30/24 at 10:57 a.m., read in part: residence staff observed Resident #21 in the common area lose balance, without his walker, and fall on his right side. Resident #21 was taken to the emergency department and returned with a diagnosis of a closed fracture of multiple ribs on the left side and fracture of the right ulna.Emergency department discharge paperwork, dated 8/30/24, read in part for Resident #21: There was a comminuted fracture of the olecranon with seven millimeters of proximal retraction of the proximal fragments. Moderate associated dorsal soft tissue swelling/hematoma.External hospice orders, dated 8/30/24, read in part for Resident #21: Diagnoses were dementia, frequent falls, failure to thrive, and a right elbow fracture.A fall assessment, dated 9/1/24, read in part: Resident #21 had balance problems while standing/walking and required the use of assistive devices.A fall assessment, dated 9/2/24, read in part: Resident #21 had balance problems while standing/walking and required the use of assistive devices.4. InterviewsOn 9/4/24 at 11:50 a.m., Staff #13 stated that to prevent falls for Resident #21, they kept him busy during the day, and provided the walker when they saw him without it. However, Staff #13 stated Resident #21 was not able to use his walker successfully anymore. The staff member confirmed that staff reviewed care plans for updates to individualized approaches necessary to address fall risk. On 9/4/24 at 11:55 a.m., Staff #11 stated to prevent falls for Resident #21, they reminded Resident #21 to use his walker. Additionally, Staff #11 stated the resident required frequent checks at night about every 10-20 minutes.On 9/4/24 at 12:27 p.m., Staff #12 stated when Resident #21 tried to walk without staff assistance, staff did their best to direct him to sit in the nearest chair to prevent falling. Staff #12 confirmed that staff reviewed the resident's electronic record and the book (a staff binder with check in times for residents marked off by staff initials which included times for specific tasks but did not include names or room numbers of the residents) for updates to individualized approaches necessary to address fall risk. 5. There was similar deficient practice for Resident #20 in which the resident fell and was injured.”
2024-09-04Annual Compliance VisitLevel D · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A revisit inspection on September 4, 2024 found that the residence failed to update care plans with individualized fall prevention strategies for two residents after they experienced multiple falls between late August and early September 2024. Resident #21 fell five times in six days, sustaining a skin tear to the elbow on August 26 and fractures to multiple ribs and the right arm on August 30, while Resident #20 fell four times and hit his head on September 1, requiring an emergency department visit. The residence's policy required care plan updates when residents' conditions changed, but staff did not implement individualized fall risk approaches despite documented balance problems and repeated falls.
Read full citation text (1)Hide full citation text
“Based on observation, interview, and record review the residence failed to detail in each resident's care plan the individualized approach necessary to address fall risk, affecting two of three sample residents (#20 and #21). Chapter 7 regulations governing assisted living residences, requires in part 12.15 that "The assisted living residence shall develop policies and procedures to establish a fall management program. The program shall include the following: B) Detailing in each resident ' s care plan the individualized approach necessary to address fall risk related to deficits in strength, balance, and eyesight, or effects of medication as identified during the comprehensive resident assessment ..." Specifically, from 8/25/24 through 8/30/24, Resident #21 experienced five falls in six days in which the residence failed to update the care plan for Resident #21 to include individualized approaches necessary to address fall risks. On 8/26/24 Resident #21 had a fall which resulted in a skin tear to the left elbow. On 8/30/24 Resident #21 had a fall which resulted in a closed fracture of multiple ribs on the left side and fracture of the right ulna.Specifically, from 8/30/24 through 9/4/24, Resident #20 experienced four falls in which the residence failed to update the care plan for Resident #20 to include individualized approaches necessary to address fall risks. Additionally, on 9/1/24 Resident #20 fell and had an abrasion on the back of his head which resulted in a visit to the emergency department. Findings include:1. Residence PolicyThe residence's Wellness Services Manual: Care Planning Assessment policy, undated, read in part: "When a resident has a change in behavior, cognition, discharge status, communication, ancillary service, need, etc. The Social Service Representative is responsible to change the care plan to match the current functioning and plan for the resident."2. Observations On 9/4/24 at 9:11 a.m., Resident #21 was seated in the residence's common area. The resident was in his walker chair hunched over with dried blood on his lip and a cast on his right arm. The resident was not able to answer questions due to cognitive impairment. 3. Record ReviewResident #21 was admitted to the residence on 6/17/24 with a diagnosis of severe unspecified dementia. The care plan for Resident #21, dated 6/13/24, read in part: The resident requires two person transfer assistance and an escort to/from meals/activities. However, the residence failed to update the care plan after his falls on 8/25, 8/26, 8/29, and 8/30/24, to detail individualized approaches necessary to address fall risks.A progress note, dated 8/25/24, read in part: Resident #21 was found sitting on his left side/hip in the grass. His wheeled walker was standing nearby. His shoes were off and nearby. A visitor wasstanding nearby him. He reported to the staff that he lost his balance and fell.A progress note, dated 8/26/24, read in part: residence staff observed Resident #21 on the floor for an unknown amount of time. The residence noted a skin tear to the left elbow.A fall assessment, dated 8/28/24, read in part: Resident #21 had balance problems while standing/walking and required the use of assistive devices.A progress note, dated 8/29/24, read in part: Residence staff observed Resident #21 on the floor next to his bed, and notified the nurse.A progress note, dated 8/30/24 at 9:47 a.m., read in part: residence staff observed Resident #21 kneeling on the floor next to his bed. Resident #21 had a swollen painful right elbow and a one centimeter skin laceration on his left elbow.A progress note, dated 8/30/24 at 10:57 a.m., read in part: residence staff observed Resident #21 in the common area lose balance, without his walker, and fall on his right side. Resident #21 was taken to the emergency department and returned with a diagnosis of a closed fracture of multiple ribs on the left side and fracture of the right ulna.Emergency department discharge paperwork, dated 8/30/24, read in part for Resident #21: There was a comminuted fracture of the olecranon with seven millimeters of proximal retraction of the proximal fragments. Moderate associated dorsal soft tissue swelling/hematoma.External hospice orders, dated 8/30/24, read in part for Resident #21: Diagnoses were dementia, frequent falls, failure to thrive, and a right elbow fracture.A fall assessment, dated 9/1/24, read in part: Resident #21 had balance problems while standing/walking and required the use of assistive devices.A fall assessment, dated 9/2/24, read in part: Resident #21 had balance problems while standing/walking and required the use of assistive devices.4. InterviewsOn 9/4/24 at 11:50 a.m., Staff #13 stated that to prevent falls for Resident #21, they kept him busy during the day, and provided the walker when they saw him without it. However, Staff #13 stated Resident #21 was not able to use his walker successfully anymore. The staff member confirmed that staff reviewed care plans for updates to individualized approaches necessary to address fall risk. On 9/4/24 at 11:55 a.m., Staff #11 stated to prevent falls for Resident #21, they reminded Resident #21 to use his walker. Additionally, Staff #11 stated the resident required frequent checks at night about every 10-20 minutes.On 9/4/24 at 12:27 p.m., Staff #12 stated when Resident #21 tried to walk without staff assistance, staff did their best to direct him to sit in the nearest chair to prevent falling. Staff #12 confirmed that staff reviewed the resident's electronic record and the book (a staff binder with check in times for residents marked off by staff initials which included times for specific tasks but did not include names or room numbers of the residents) for updates to individualized approaches necessary to address fall risk. 5. There was similar deficient practice for Resident #20 in which the resident fell and was injured.”
2024-09-04Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint revisit inspection was conducted on September 4, 2024, to determine whether deficiencies cited on September 7, 2023, had been corrected. A deficiency was found during this revisit. The facility operates under revised assisted living regulations that took effect on July 1, 2024.
6 older inspections from 2018 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience