Brookdale Greenwood Village-alr
7 CDPHE citations on record, last inspected Apr 2026, license 2304MV.
Brookdale Greenwood Village-alr has 7 CDPHE citations on record; last inspected Apr 2026.
Memory-care basis not yet recorded from the state file.
Source: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
CDPHE recordLast inspection April 22, 2026
A large home, reviewed on public record.

© Google Street View
Compared to 25 Colorado facilities with a similar number of beds.
Assisted living memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment.
on file.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDPHE inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
7 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
7 total · 36 monthsCDPHE Level A–E
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
CDPHE licenses assisted living residences. A secure environment for residents who need one is optional under Chapter 7, Part 25. CDPHE does not publish a facility-level list of homes that have that option, so this page does not call the home state-verified memory care.
Ask on tour
“Ask whether the home has a secure environment, and ask to see the part of the license that says so.”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Brookdale Greenwood Village-alr's record and state requirements.
The facility markets memory care, but CDPHE does not publish a facility-level Secure Environment roster for Colorado communities — can you provide written documentation of the specific dementia training all direct-care staff complete, including the curriculum topics and frequency of refresher training?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
State records show 11 inspection reports on file with 7 deficiencies cited — can you walk us through the corrective action plans submitted to CDPHE for those deficiencies and confirm which have been verified as resolved?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Six complaints were filed with CDPHE during the inspection period on file — were any of those complaints substantiated, and can you share the written remediation steps the facility implemented in response?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
From this home's file.
Counts and lines from the state file we hold.
- Does Brookdale Greenwood Village-alr provide memory care?
Memory-care basis not yet recorded from the state file.
- When was Brookdale Greenwood Village-alr last inspected?
Brookdale Greenwood Village-alr was last inspected on April 22, 2026. That visit is a complaint investigation.
- Has Brookdale Greenwood Village-alr been cited by CDPHE?
Yes. Brookdale Greenwood Village-alr has 7 deficiencies from CDPHE in the last three years. None are tagged immediate jeopardy.
- How many citations does Brookdale Greenwood Village-alr have?
Brookdale Greenwood Village-alr has 7 deficiencies across 8 inspections in the last three years. None are tagged immediate jeopardy.
- Who licenses Brookdale Greenwood Village-alr?
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment licenses Brookdale Greenwood Village-alr. The license number is 2304MV. State record: https://cdphe.colorado.gov/health-facilities/find-and-compare-facilities
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
8 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Plain-language summaries open first — click into any row for the full citation text.
2026-04-22Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
This complaint investigation is in the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment public file. No citation text was included for this visit.
2025-06-16Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A follow-up inspection on June 16, 2025 found that the facility had corrected all deficiencies that were identified during the previous inspection on February 11, 2025. The facility is now in compliance with all previously cited requirements.
2025-06-16Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A revisit inspection was conducted on June 16, 2025 to verify that deficiencies cited during a February 11, 2025 complaint investigation had been corrected. The facility was found to be in compliance with all previously cited deficiencies.
2025-06-16Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A revisit inspection was completed on June 16, 2025 to verify that the facility had corrected all deficiencies from a previous inspection on February 11, 2025. The facility was found to be in compliance with all previously cited deficiencies. No violations were identified.
2025-03-19Complaint InvestigationNo findings
Plain-language summary
This complaint investigation is in the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment public file. No citation text was included for this visit.
2025-02-11Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A revisit inspection was completed on February 11, 2025 to verify that all deficiencies from an August 2022 inspection had been corrected. The facility was evaluated under Colorado's updated assisted living regulations that took effect July 1, 2024.
2025-02-11Complaint InvestigationLevel B · 5 findings
Plain-language summary
A licensure and complaint investigation on February 11, 2025, found that the administrator failed to manage day-to-day operations affecting 83 residents, including not conducting required quarterly medication audits, failing to ensure a CPR-certified staff member was present during at least 15 shifts between January 27 and February 13, 2025, and not maintaining an updated resident roster with emergency contact information readily available at the front desk. The administrator acknowledged responsibility for these requirements but stated she had delegated tasks to other staff members and was unaware of some obligations such as the medication audit requirement.
Read full citation text (5)Hide full citation text
“Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure there was at least one staff member onsite at all times who had current certification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and obstructed airway techniques from a nationally recognized organization, affecting 83 current residents. (Cross-reference S0540)Findings include:A review of staff CPR certifications and staff schedules from 1/27/25-2/13/25 revealed the following 10 shifts did not have a person onsite certified CPR: Day shifts: 1/28, 2/6, 2/13Afternoon shifts: 1/27, 1/28, 1/30, 2/4, 2/5 -2/10, 2/11 and 2/12.On 2/11/25 at 3:40 p.m., the administrator stated it was her responsibility to ensure there was one staff member onsite at all times with current certification in CPR and she looked at the schedule daily to ensure compliance. She acknowledged discrepancies and there were shifts without a staff member certified in CPR.”
“Based on observation, interview and record review, the residence failed to ensure the administrator managed the day-to-day operations of the assisted living residence, including managing the day-to-day delivery of services to ensure residents received the care that is described in the resident agreement and for complying with all applicable state and local laws concerning licensure and certification, affecting 83 current residents. (Cross reference S0734, S0910, S1604) Findings include:Chapter VII regulations governing assisted living residences, part 2.2, defines "Administrator" as a person who is responsible for the overall operation, daily administration, management and maintenance of the assisted living residence. The term "administrator" is synonymous with "operator" as that term is used in Title 25, Article 27, Part 1.The department database revealed the administrator was the administrator of record as of 2/11/24. The administrator provided a certificate that indicated she had been qualified to be an administrator since 11/17/22.a. Quarterly Medication Audits The residence failed to ensure the administrator and qualified medication administration supervisor audited the accuracy and completeness of the medication administration records as required. On 2/11/25 at 3:13 p.m., the administrator stated she was unaware of the requirement to participate in quarterly medication audits and had not completed one. b. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) RequirementsThe residence failed to have a CPR certified staff member onsite on from 2:00 p.m., to 10:00 p.m., for 10 days from 1/27/24 to 2/13/25. From 10:00 p.m., to 6:00 a.m., for five days from 1/27/24 to 2/13/25.On 2/11/25 at 3:40 p.m., the administrator stated it was her responsibility to ensure there was one staff member onsite at all times with current certification in CPR and she looked at the schedule daily to ensure compliance. She acknowledged there were shifts without a staff member certified in CPR. c. Resident Roster The residence failed to have an updated, readily available roster containing all requirements, resident name, room number, emergency contact information and a diagram of the residence. On 2/11/25 at 8:45 a.m., the administrator confirmed a resident roster with the resident names and room number was their official resident roster. She stated the residence had an emergency preparedness binder with the roster as well. On 2/11/25 at 9:50 a.m., the administrator presented a second roster from the emergency preparedness binder however, she acknowledged it had not been updated with recent residents who had been admitted and it had not included emergency contact information. On 2/11/25 at 3:40 p.m., the administrator confirmed that she was aware that the residence needed to have an emergency roster readily available at the front desk. Further stating that they were not in compliance with what regulation 10.1 required.On 2/11/25 at 3:41 p.m., the administrator stated she delegated many of the tasks to other members of the team, she understood managing the day to day was her responsibility. However, she stated she was not a nurse and nursing duties were not her responsibility.”
“Based on interview and record review the residence failed to ensure the administrator and qualified medication administration supervisor audited the accuracy and completeness of the medication administration records affecting 83 current residents. (Cross-reference S0540)Findings include:The residence's Medications Systems policy, dated 10/11/23, read in part: Ongoing oversight of medication delivery would be provided through the residence's quality assurance section. The oversight consisted of routine medication administration record (MAR) audits and MAR to medication cart audits which focused on medication availability. On 2/11/25 quarterly medication audits were requested from the administrator and provided. However, the medication audits were not completed by the administrator and the qualified medication administration supervisor, they were completed by the health and wellness director and the resident care coordinator.On 2/11/25 at 9:13 a.m., the health and wellness director stated she had been completing the medication audits with the resident care coordinator monthly, she stated the administrator did not review or complete medication audits with them. On 2/11/25 at 3:13 p.m., the administrator stated she was not aware of the regulation and therefore did not complete the audits.”
“Based on record review, and interview, the residence failed to have a readily available roster of current residents, their room assignments, and emergency contact information, along with a residence diagram showing room locations, affecting 83 current residents. (Cross-reference S0540)Findings include:1. Record ReviewOn 2/11/25 at 8:45 a.m., a resident roster, provided by the administrator (AD), was not readily available and failed to include two current resident names along with their room assignments and emergency contact information (ECI). Additionally, the names on the resident roster did not accurately reflect the current residents, their ECI, their room numbers or the residence diagram showing room locations.On 2/11/25 at 9:39 a.m., a second resident roster, provided by the AD, was not readily available and failed to include two current resident names along with their room assignments and emergency contact information (ECI). Additionally, the names on the resident roster did not accurately reflect the current residents, their ECI, their room numbers or the residence diagram showing room locations.On 2/11/25 at 9:50 a.m., a third resident roster, provided by the administrator,was not readily available and failed to include two current resident names along with their room assignments and emergency contact information (ECI). Additionally, the names on the resident roster did not accurately reflect the current residents, their ECI, their room numbers or the residence diagram showing room locations.2. InterviewsOn 2/11/25 at 8:45 a.m., the AD confirmed that the roster provided was not readily available and was the residence's "official roster". Further stating that the emergency prep roster was located in the emergency book and did not include two current residents.On 2/11/25 at 8:45 a.m., the AD confirmed the roster provided did not include all aspects of the 10.1 regulation.On 2/11/25 at 9:50 a.m., the AD confirmed the residence roster was not in compliance with the 10.1 regulation, the roster was not readily available and did not include the ECI, room number or map of the residence. She further stated, the required information was in her office and not accessible by staff. On 2/11/25 at 3:40 p.m., the AD confirmed to be aware the residence needed an emergency roster readily available. Further stating that the residence roster was not in compliance with the 10.1 regulation.”
“Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure health information records for residents were kept on site for at least three years following the termination of the resident's stay, affecting one of two former residents (#10). Findings include:Former resident #17 was admitted to the residence on 1/18/22 and discharged on 12/29/23.Records were requested for Former resident #17; however, the residence could not provide the resident's complete record as the residence could not find the paper records the former administrator had kept. The residence did not have recent care plans, recent assessments, or provide medication administration records (MARs) at the end of the onsite visit for Former resident #17.On 2/11/25 at 11:25 a.m., the health and wellness director stated the previous administrator had stored resident records in disorganized boxes.. She added Former resident #17 had been discharged from the residence prior to her hire date and could not find the record. On 2/11/25 at 3:13 p.m., the administrator stated the residence did not have the complete record for many residents as the previous administrator had not left the residence with complete files. She stated she did not have the record for Former resident #17.”
2025-02-11Annual Compliance VisitLevel B · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
A revisit inspection on February 11, 2025, found that the residence failed to maintain compliance with administrator responsibilities for day-to-day operations affecting all 83 current residents, including gaps in quarterly medication audits (which were completed by other staff instead of the administrator), failure to maintain a CPR-certified staff member on-site during certain shifts between January 27, 2024, and February 13, 2025, and failure to keep an updated resident roster with emergency contact information readily available. The administrator acknowledged she was unaware of some regulatory requirements and stated she had delegated tasks to other staff members despite understanding that managing day-to-day operations was her responsibility. These deficiencies had been cited previously in August 2022, but the residence was found to have corrected them at that time and has now failed to maintain compliance.
Read full citation text (2)Hide full citation text
“Based on observation, interview and record review, the residence failed to ensure the administrator managed the day-to-day operations of the assisted living residence, including managing the day-to-day delivery of services to ensure residents received the care that is described in the resident agreement and for complying with all applicable state and local laws concerning licensure and certification, affecting 83 current residents. (Cross reference S0734, S0910, S1604) This deficiency was cited previously during a state relicensure and complaint survey on 8/23/22. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement.Findings include:Chapter VII regulations governing assisted living residences, part 2.2, defines "Administrator" as a person who is responsible for the overall operation, daily administration, management and maintenance of the assisted living residence. The term "administrator" is synonymous with "operator" as that term is used in Title 25, Article 27, Part 1.The department database revealed the administrator was the administrator of record as of 2/11/24. The administrator provided a certificate that indicated she had been qualified to be an administrator since 11/17/22.a. Quarterly Medication Audits The residence failed to ensure the administrator and qualified medication administration supervisor audited the accuracy and completeness of the medication administration records as required. On 2/11/25 at 3:13 p.m., the administrator stated she was unaware of the requirement to participate in quarterly medication audits and had not completed one. b. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) RequirementsThe residence failed to have a CPR certified staff member onsite on from 2:00 p.m., to 10:00 p.m., for 10 days from 1/27/24 to 2/13/25. From 10:00 p.m., to 6:00 a.m., for five days from 1/27/24 to 2/13/25.On 2/11/25 at 3:40 p.m., the administrator stated it was her responsibility to ensure there was one staff member onsite at all times with current certification in CPR and she looked at the schedule daily to ensure compliance. She acknowledged there were shifts without a staff member certified in CPR. c. Resident Roster The residence failed to have an updated, readily available roster containing all requirements, resident name, room number, emergency contact information and a diagram of the residence. On 2/11/25 at 8:45 a.m., the administrator confirmed a resident roster with the resident names and room number was their official resident roster. She stated the residence had an emergency preparedness binder with the roster as well. On 2/11/25 at 9:50 a.m., the administrator presented a second roster from the emergency preparedness binder however, she acknowledged it had not been updated with recent residents who had been admitted and it had not included emergency contact information. On 2/11/25 at 3:40 p.m., the administrator confirmed that she was aware that the residence needed to have an emergency roster readily available at the front desk. Further stating that they were not in compliance with what regulation 10.1 required.On 2/11/25 at 3:41 p.m., the administrator stated she delegated many of the tasks to other members of the team, she understood managing the day to day was her responsibility. However, she stated she was not a nurse and nursing duties were not her responsibility.”
“Based on interview and record review the residence failed to ensure the administrator and qualified medication administration supervisor audited the accuracy and completeness of the medication administration records affecting 83 current residents. (Cross Reference S0540)This deficiency was cited previously during a state relicensure and complaint survey on 8/23/22. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement.Findings include:The residence's Medications Systems policy, dated 10/11/23, read in part: Ongoing oversight of medication delivery would be provided through the residence's quality assurance section. The oversight consisted of routine medication administration record (MAR) audits and MAR to medication cart audits which focused on medication availability. On 2/11/25 quarterly medication audits were requested from the administrator and provided. However, the medication audits were not completed by the administrator and the qualified medication administration supervisor, they were completed by the health and wellness director and the resident care coordinator.On 2/11/25 at 9:13 a.m., the health and wellness director stated she had been completing the medication audits with the resident care coordinator monthly, she stated the administrator did not review or complete medication audits with them. On 2/11/25 at 3:13 p.m., the administrator stated she was not aware of the regulation and therefore did not complete the audits.”
3 older inspections from 2020 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience