Activcare at Yorba Linda.
Activcare at Yorba Linda is Ranked in the top 21% of California memory care with 2 CDSS citations on record; last inspected Jan 2026.

A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 54 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Activcare at Yorba Linda has 2 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
2 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Elopements, fires, epidemic outbreaks, and poisonings must be reported immediately. Abuse with serious bodily injury requires a 2-hour phone report + 2-hour written report to CDSS, Adult Protective Services, and law enforcement. Abuse without serious bodily injury must be reported within 24 hours. A resident death requires a phone call by the next working day and a written report within 7 days. Injuries requiring medical treatment beyond first aid, and bankruptcy/foreclosure/utility shutoff notices, must also be reported. Incidents not reported on time are a separate violation — families may file a complaint directly with CDSS.
Ask on tour
“When was the last incident report filed with CDSS, and may I see your incident log summary for the past 12 months?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Activcare at Yorba Linda's record and state requirements.
The facility holds an 80-bed license under operator income Prop Grp; Activcare Living Rac Yorba Linda — can you provide the current CDSS license document showing the license status and any conditions or restrictions attached to license #306005322?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
CDSS records show zero inspections, zero deficiencies, and zero complaints on file for this facility — can you explain when the most recent state licensing visit occurred and provide a copy of any inspection reports or compliance documentation you have on file?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The facility advertises memory care services but does not carry a formal memory-care designation in CDSS licensing records — does the facility operate under California Title 22 §87705 dementia-care requirements, and can you provide the written dementia-care program if so?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
5 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-01-21Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was an investigation into four complaints about a resident's care, including allegations about falls, medication administration, bedroom access, and meal variety. The facility was found to have no violation regarding falls (the resident fell while attempting self-transfer, but the facility had put fall prevention measures in place), meal variety (staff and residents confirmed alternative meal options were available), and forced medication (five residents and all four staff interviewed denied this occurred); however, the investigation could not prove or disprove the allegation about administering medication without the responsible party's consent because the resident had moved out and records were no longer available.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Staff interviewed stated that R1 sustained some falls due to R1 attempting to transfer herself, even though she required assistance with transferring. Staff interviewed also stated that the facility put fall prevention methods in place for R1. The fall prevention methods put in place for R1 included a lowered bell, a fall mat, a tab alarm, and additional routine checks. Additionally, staff interviewed stated that R1 did not sustain any injuries from her falls at the facility. Although R1 sustained falls while at the facility, staff interviewed confirmed that fall prevention techniques were put in place to deter future falls, and prevent any serious injuries. Regarding the allegation, facility forcing resident to take medications, the following has been concluded: It was alleged that R1 was forced to take medications. The Department conducted an interview with R1. However, R1 was unable to provide a statement regarding this allegation. The Department conducted seven resident interviews. One resident was unable to be qualified for an interview and another resident declined to be interview. However, five out of the seven residents interviewed denied the allegation and stated that they have never been forced to take any medications. The Department conducted four staff interviews. Four out of the four staff interviewed denied the allegation and stated that R1 was never forced to take any medications. Regarding the allegation, facility not allowing resident access to their bedroom, the following has been concluded: It was alleged that the facility did not allow R1 access to her bedroom. The Department conducted an interview with R1. However, R1 was unable to provide a statement regarding this allegation. The Department conducted four staff interviews. One out of the four staff interviewed was unable to recall any information about this allegation. However, three out of the four staff interviewed denied the allegation. Staff interviewed stated that R1 was encouraged to be in the main activity room so that she could be observed by more staff since she had a history of falls at the facility. Staff interviewed also stated that they would assist R1 to her bedroom if she requested to go there. The Department conducted seven resident interviews. One resident was unable to be qualified for an interview and another resident declined to be interview. However, five out of the seven residents interviewed denied the allegation and stated that they are allowed to go to their bedrooms whenever they want to. Regarding the allegation, facility administering medication without obtaining consent from resident's responsible party, the following has been concluded: It was alleged that the facility administered R1's PRN Ativan medication without obtaining consent from R1's responsible party. CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Regarding the allegation, facility not providing a variety of meals to resident, the following has been concluded: The Department conducted seven resident interviews. One resident was unable to be qualified for an interview and another resident declined to be interview. However, five out of the seven residents interviewed denied the allegation. Residents interviewed stated that they are satisfied with the food provided by the facility. Residents interviewed also confirmed the facility provides alternative food options if they do not like the meals that are served on that day. The Department conducted four staff interviews. Four out of the four staff interviewed denied the allegation and confirmed the facility provides alternative food options if residents are not satisfied with the meals that are served on that day. The Department inspected the food menu provided to residents and observed the facility provides a variety of food options to residents. The Department also observed that residents are able to order off of the alternative menu if they are not satisfied with the food options served on that day. Based on the evidence gathered during this investigation, the complaint is UNFOUNDED, meaning that the two allegations are false, could not have happened and/or is without reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Enrique Ledesma and a copy of the report was provided. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 The Department conducted an interview with R1. However, R1 was unable to provide a statement regarding this allegation. The Department conducted four staff interviews. One out of the four staff interviewed was recall any information about this allegation. However, three out of the four staff interviewed denied the allegation. Staff interviewed stated that consent was received from R1's responsible party regarding R1's PRN Ativan medication. The Department was unable to review any medication administration records for R1 due to R1 moving out of the facility on September 19, 2022. Additionally, the facility no longer has any records for R1 on the premises. Due to the conflicting information received during the investigation, the Department is unable to ascertain if the allegations occurred as reported. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, the four allegations are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Enrique Ledesma and a copy of the report was provided.
2025-08-26Annual Compliance VisitType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During a follow-up visit related to a previous complaint investigation, inspectors found that the facility failed to report 18 falls that occurred between February and August 2025, even though staff had documented these falls in the resident's progress notes. The facility did not submit required incident reports for any of these falls to the state licensing department. The facility was cited for this violation, and management was notified of the findings and their appeal rights.
“Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. LPA observed Licensee did not send incident reports for falls on R1, which posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Edward Kim conducted a case management visit to document a deficiency observed during the investigation of complaint 22-AS-20250820085829 but unrelated to the allegation investigated. During the visit at the facility, LPA reviewed R1’s Facility’s Progress Notes and observed the following falls were listed in the Progress Notes, but no incident reports were received by the department: February 12, 2025, February 26, 2025, February 28, 2025, June 8, 2025, June 10, 2025, July 2, 2025, around 1:30 AM, July 2, 2025, around 8:20 AM, July 4, 2025, July 6, 2025, July 11, 2025, July 14, 2025, July 19, 2025, July 25, 2025, July 30, 2025, and August 3, 2025. A deficiency was cited during the visit according to Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8. The facility did not send incident reports of when R1 had falls on February 12, 2025, February 26, 2025, February 28, 2025, June 8, 2025, June 10, 2025, July 2, 2025, around 1:30 AM, July 2, 2025, around 8:20 AM, July 4, 2025, July 6, 2025, July 11, 2025, July 14, 2025, July 19, 2025, July 25, 2025, July 30, 2025, and August 3, 2025. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report, LIC811, and appeal rights were provided to Executive Director Enrique Ledesma.
2025-07-25Other VisitType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During a routine annual inspection on July 25, 2025, the facility was found to be clean, well-maintained, and properly stocked with supplies, but inspectors cited two issues: three staff members had not completed their required annual 20-hour training for 2024, and one resident with dementia did not have a current medical assessment on file (the last one was from June 2024). The facility's emergency equipment, fire safety systems, and infection control practices were in order at the time of the visit.
“Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in three out of eight staff. LPA observed S1, S2, and S3 did not complete the 20 hours for 2024, which posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 08/08/2025 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Licensee states they will read and sign a statement of understanding for Health Safety Code 1569.625(b) and will send a plan that will ensure staff complete the 20 hours for 2025. Licensee will send proof of this to CCLD via email to edward.kim@dss.ca.gov by POC due date August 8, 2025.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On July 25, 2025, at 9:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Edward Kim conducted an unannounced required 1-Year annual visit using the CARE Inspection Tool. Upon arrival at the facility, LPA Kim met with Executive Director (ED) Enrique Ledesma and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is licensed to operate for eighty (80) non-ambulatory, of which seventeen (17) may be bedridden, and have a hospice waiver for fifteen (15) residents. Facility is approved for delayed egress and secure perimeter, and a waiver for locked perimeter gates. The facility is a single-story structure, which consists of the following: fifty-four (54) resident bedrooms, six (6) office rooms, thirty-eight (38) bathrooms, waiting area, activity area, dining room, kitchen, and two (2) outdoor covered patio areas. LPA Kim toured indoor and outdoor of the physical plant with ED Ledesma. There are no bodies of water or obstructions on the premises. All rooms were inspected. Beds and bedding supplies were in good condition, adequate lighting was provided, storage for each resident’s personal belongings was observed. Bed linens, comforters, and bath towels were adequately stocked at the time of visit. The following bedrooms were inspected: Resident Room 102, Resident Room 203, Resident Room 206, Resident Room 207, Resident Room 208, Resident Room 302, Resident Room 305, Resident Room 402 and Resident Room 406. Bathrooms were found to be within Title 22 regulations and were clean and operational. The water temperature measured between 110.4 degrees F and 117.5 degrees F. A comfortable temperature of 75 degrees F was maintained in the facility. LPA Kim observed the facility to be sanitary and appropriately furnished at the time of visit. Storage areas for personal hygiene, cleaning supplies, toxins, and sharps objects were stored and not accessible to residents. Evaluation Report Continues on LIC 809-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 During the visit, LPA Kim observed the facility's infection control practices. LPA observed the facility has a 30-day supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). The kitchen was inspected and there is a two-day supply of perishable and seven-day supply of non-perishable food available and maintained properly. Emergency food is stored in the kitchen. Emergency water and emergency supplies were stored in a storage closet. A working telephone (714-577-8005) remains available and is dedicated to the residents. LPA Kim reviewed the facility’s plan of operation, emergency and disaster plan, and fire/safety drill log. The facility conducted a Fire/Safety Drill on June 15, 2025. The facility has eleven (11) fire extinguishers that were charged and they were all serviced on September 5, 2024. All smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were operable and last checked on October 29, 2024, by Orange County Fire Authority. First Aid was maintained and contained all the necessary elements. Certificate of Liability insurance is effective October 10, 2024, and expires on October 10, 2025. LPA Kim conducted an audit of eight (8) resident files (R1-R8), eight (8) staff files (S1-S8), and medication and medication administration record. LPA observed R1’s medical assessment dated June 25, 2024, and was diagnosed with dementia. LPA also observed S1, S2, and S3 did not complete twenty hours of training for 2024. LPA conducted six (6) resident interviews and four (4) staff interviews. A deficiency was cited during the visit according to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8). The annual twenty hours of staff training for three out of eight staff (S1, S2, and S3), were not completed. A technical violation was assessed during the visit. LPA observed R1, diagnosed with dementia, did not have a current medical assessment for 2025. The last medical assessment was dated June 25, 2024. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report, LIC811, LIC809D, and appeal rights were provided to Executive Director Enrique Ledesma.
2024-11-21Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A licensing representative conducted an unannounced follow-up visit on November 21, 2024, to review an incident the facility had reported to regulators. The inspector reviewed staff records, resident files, facility conditions, and interviewed staff, and found no violations or health and safety concerns.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On November 21, 2024, at 9:15am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Edward Kim conducted an unannounced Case Management Visit to follow-up on an incident report that was self reported from the facility. LPA Kim was greeted and granted entry by staff. LPA explained the purpose of the visit to Marketing Director Shannen Buckholz. During today’s visit, LPA conducted a health and safety check, and there were no imminent health/safety concerns observed. Facility maintained at a comfortable temperature for the residents in care. LPA obtained Staff Roster, Resident Roster, and R1’s records which includes the Physician’s Report, Admission’s Agreement, Emergency Information, Consent Forms, Incident Reports, and Appraisal and Needs/Service Plan. LPA conducted three staff interviews and attempted two staff phone interviews. No deficiencies were observed during this visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the Marketing Director Shannen Buckholz.
2024-07-18Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was an unannounced annual inspection on July 18, 2024, in which the facility was found to meet requirements in all major areas including physical plant condition, cleanliness, food and water supply, emergency preparedness, and resident care documentation. One technical violation was noted related to Title 22 regulations.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
On July 18, 2024 around 8:25AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Edward Kim conducted an unannounced required 1-Year annual visit using the CARE Inspection Tool. Upon arrival at the facility, LPA Kim met with Executive Director (ED) Enrique Ledesma and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is licensed to operate for sixty (60) non-ambulatory, of which 15 may be bedridden, and have a hospice waiver for fifteen (15) residents. Facility is approved for delayed egress and secure perimeter, and a waiver for locked perimeter gates. The facility is a single-story structure, which consists of the following: fifty-three (53) resident bedrooms, six (6) office rooms, thirty-eight (38) bathrooms, waiting area, activity area, dining room, kitchen, and two (2) outdoor covered patio areas. LPA Kim toured indoor and outdoor of the physical plant with ED Ledesma. There are no bodies of water or obstructions on the premises. All rooms were inspected. Beds and bedding supplies were in good condition, adequate lighting was provided, storage for each resident’s personal belongings was observed. Bed linens, comforters, and bath towels were adequately stocked at the time of visit. The following bedrooms were inspected: Resident Room 101, Resident Room 106, Resident Room 206, Resident Room 209, Resident Room 306, Resident Room 307, Resident Room 310, Resident Room 401 and Resident Room 409. Bathrooms were found to be within Title 22 regulations and were clean and operational. The water temperature measured between 107.2 degrees F and 114.9 degrees F. A comfortable temperature of 74 degrees F was maintained in the facility. LPA Kim observed the facility to be sanitary and appropriately furnished at the time of visit. Storage areas for personal hygiene, cleaning supplies, toxins, and sharps objects were stored and not accessible to clients. The kitchen was inspected and there is a two-day supply of perishable and seven-day supply of non-perishable food available and maintained properly. Evaluation Report Continues on LIC 809-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 During the visit, LPA Kim observed the facility's infection control practices. LPA observed the facility has a 30-day supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Emergency food is stored in the kitchen. Emergency water and emergency supplies were stored in a storage closet. A working telephone (714-577-8005) remains available. LPA Kim reviewed the facility’s plan of operation, emergency and disaster plan, and fire/safety drill log. The facility conducted a Fire/Safety Drill on April 22, 2024. The facility has eleven (11) fire extinguishers that are charged and they were all serviced on September 22, 2023, smoke detectors, and carbon monoxide detectors were operable and last checked on November 7, 2023. First Aid was maintained and contained all the necessary elements. LPA Kim conducted an audit of ten (10) resident files (R1-R10), eight (8) staff files (S1-S8), and medication and medication administration record were all in order and complete. LPA conducted three (3) resident interviews and seven (7) staff interviews. A Technical violation was assessed during this inspection visit according to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8). An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Executive Director Enrique Ledesma.
2 older inspections from 2021 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Orange County.
Other memory care facilities in Orange County with similar care offerings.
Free · Full Inspection Record
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.

