Oakmont of Whittier.
Oakmont of Whittier is Ranked in the top 36% of California memory care with 7 CDSS citations on record; last inspected May 2026.

A large home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 58 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · FREE
Oakmont of Whittier has 7 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Where are you in the process? (optional)
Citation history, plotted month by month.
7 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
4 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Elopements, fires, epidemic outbreaks, and poisonings must be reported immediately. Abuse with serious bodily injury requires a 2-hour phone report + 2-hour written report to CDSS, Adult Protective Services, and law enforcement. Abuse without serious bodily injury must be reported within 24 hours. A resident death requires a phone call by the next working day and a written report within 7 days. Injuries requiring medical treatment beyond first aid, and bankruptcy/foreclosure/utility shutoff notices, must also be reported. Incidents not reported on time are a separate violation — families may file a complaint directly with CDSS.
Ask on tour
“When was the last incident report filed with CDSS, and may I see your incident log summary for the past 12 months?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Oakmont of Whittier's record and state requirements.
The facility has 2 serious citations on file across all inspections — can you provide your corrective-action plan for each cited item, and show families any documentation of remediation steps taken?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
11 complaints are on file with CDSS — were any substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The facility has 3 deficiencies on file — can you provide documentation showing how each deficiency was corrected and when the corrective action was completed?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
17 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-05-26Complaint InvestigationType B · 1 finding
“This requirement was not met as evidenced by: This department did not receive written notification within 30 days of a new administrator change. This poses a potential risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted an unannounced Case Management Visit-Deficiencies on 05/26/2026. LPA was greeted by Administrator Blasia Lee-Lole and explained the purpose of the visit. Case Management findings: On 04/27/2026, LPA Ramirez attempted to contact facility Administrator Adriane Runge via telephone. LPA was advised that Administrator Runge was no longer the facility Administrator and Blasia Lee-Lole was appointed as the facility Administrator effective 02/19/2026. Later that evening, Monterey Park Regional Office received an email and attachments advising the department of notification of Administrator Association change. The attachment letter was dated 03/02/2026 and it revealed that effective 02/19/2026, the licensee (Oakmont Management Group) appointed Blasia Lee-Lole as facility administrator. On 05/26/2026, LPA Ramirez conducted a Case Management visit and requested proof that the licensee notified this department in writing, within 30 days of the hiring of a new administrator. The licensee was unable to provide LPA with requested documents at this time. Based on records reviewed, LPA Ramirez issued one (1) type B deficiency. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report, 809-D and appeals rights were provided.
2026-03-19Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
An investigation looked into a complaint that a staff member stole a resident's bank card and made unauthorized purchases. Police reviewed the charges and found insufficient evidence to link them to any staff member, and interviews with six staff members and six residents all denied the allegation or provided alternative explanations for the missing money. The allegation was found to be unsubstantiated.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Staff stole resident's funds. It is alleged that R1’s bank card was stolen and it is believed that S3 may have stolen the card to make multiple purchases. LPA contacted local police department, spoke to the detective and obtained a copy of the police report, the police report and detective disclosed that there was not enough proof/evidence to link the charges made to R1’s card to any staff at the facility and the allegation was unsubstantiated. LPA interviewed 6 staff and each denied the allegation stating that they have never stolen any items or money from the residents nor have they ever witnessed another staff steal from the residents. S3 stated they have never stolen any money from residents and that this particular day in question S3 observed R1’s roommate with a wallet at their desk, the wallet belonged to R1 and it was confiscated, returned to R1 and reported to management immediately. LPA interviewed 6 residents and each denied the allegation, interview with R5 revealed that they had money missing upon moving in but did not believe staff had anything to do with it, staff encouraged R5 to file a police report and although the money was never found R5 stated that they believe they must have dropped it or misplaced it as this is something they do at times. R5 stated this is the only time this has ever happened. Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff/residents, review of police report and facility file records, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was provided.
2025-10-18Other VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation looked into two allegations: that staff failed to prevent sexual abuse of a resident, and that staff did not properly safeguard a resident's hearing aids and walker. Investigators interviewed eight staff members and four other residents, reviewed records, and found no evidence to support either allegation—staff consistently reported that hearing aids were properly stored and charged, and no corroborating accounts of missing belongings were found. No violations were cited.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
The investigation revealed the following: regarding the allegation “Staff did not prevent a resident from being sexually abused while in care.” It is alleged staff did not prevent R1 from being sexually abused while in care. Interviews conducted by Community Care Licensing Investigation Branch did not corroborate this allegation. Eight (8) out of the eight (8) staff interviewed by LPA Ramirez, did not corroborate with this allegation. Staff interviews revealed R1 suffered from cognitive impairment and aggressive behaviors. Interview with S6 revealed prior to R1 relocating to the facility memory care unit, R1 revealed to S6 that they (R1) experienced a traumatic event when they were younger and S6 believed this traumatic event was re-manifested into R1’s memory and that’s why R1 made this allegation. S6 revealed they did not care for R1 once R1 moved to the facility memory care but, S6 would still go visit R1 and observed R1 to be well cared for by memory care staff. Four (4) out of the four (4) residents interviewed by LPA Ramirez did not corroborate this allegation. Despite several attempts to contact R1 by Community Care Licensing Investigation Branch and LPA Ramirez, all attempts were unsuccessful. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . “Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings.” It is alleged staff did not safeguard R1’s hearing aid devices and walker. Eight (8) out of the eight (8) staff interviewed by LPA Ramirez, did not corroborate with this allegation. S8 revealed that R1’s hearing aids were charged in the memory care medication room; along with all other memory care residents’ hearing aids. S8 revealed they recalled R1’s hearing aids were believed to have been misplaced but were located shortly after in the medication room. S7 revealed that R1’s hearing aids were placed on R1 during the day and charged at night in the memory care medication room. S7 revealed that R1 would take off their hearing aids often and staff would place them on the charger. S7 revealed they were never told by any staff or by R1’s family that R1’s walker was missing. Review of R1’s Client/Resident Personal Property and Valuables (LIC 921), did not corroborate this allegation. LPA Ramirez made multiple attempts to contact R1 and R1’s responsible party but all attempts were unsuccessful. Four (4) out of the four (4) residents interviewed by LPA Ramirez did not corroborate this allegation. R2 revealed that they have never had any personal belongings missing. R3 revealed staff treated them well and they felt safe to leave expensive personal belongings out when staff clean their room. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . No deficiencies were cited during this complaint investigation. A copy of this report was provided.
2025-10-18Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A routine annual inspection was conducted on October 18, 2025, and no deficiencies were found. The facility has proper staffing credentials, maintains required resident records and training documentation, and has emergency preparedness plans in place including drills and evacuation routes. Medications are stored securely and the facility was operating within its licensed capacity.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted an unannounced subsequent annual inspection visit on 10/18/2025 and was greeted by Gina Alvarez- Business Office Director and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. LPA Ramirez conducted initial annual inspection on 10/02/2025. Administrator Adriane Runge arrived shortly after to assist. LPA Ramirez identified herself and explained the purpose of the visit. Operational Requirements: The fire clearance is approved for ninety-seven (97) non- ambulatory resident, of which seven (7) may be bedridden. This facility may retain no more than fifteen (15) hospice residents. There were eight (8) residents under hospice care, during annual inspection. Staffing: Administrator Certificate (7003384740) for Adriane Runge with an expiration date of 06/05/2027 was observed. Staff employed are over the age of 18 and are fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. Personnel Records Training: Staff files are maintained at the facility. LPA Ramirez observed required annual training, CPR and First Aid for six (6) out of the six (6) personnel record reviewed. LPA Ramirez observed TB testing results, Health screening, fingerprint clearance and job application for six (6) out of the six (6) personnel record reviewed. Resident Records/Incident Reports: LPA reviewed resident records for six (6) residents in care. Resident records are maintained at the facility. Admission Agreement, Physician's Report (including T.B and Ambulatory Status), Consent for Medical Treatment, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Resident Pre-Appraisal, Care Plan/Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, Resident Rights were observed. Planned Activities: LPA Ramirez observed board games, magazines, and other activities for residents. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has the Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC610D/9 pages) in place. Last documented emergency drills were conducted on 09/27/2025. LPA Ramirez observed facility sketches with exits and emergency exits routes throughout various locations of the facility. LPA Ramirez observed emergency food supply located in pantry. Health Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: The medications are centrally stored in the medication room and in bubble packs and/or original containers. LPA Ramirez observed Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record. The facility provides incidental medical services. No deficiencies were observed during this visit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided.
2025-10-02Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
During a routine annual inspection on July 8, 2025, inspectors found the facility in compliance with safety and operational standards, including proper storage of hazardous materials, working smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors, safe water temperatures, clean food storage areas, and secure oxygen equipment. The facility had eight residents receiving hospice care, which is within the allowed limit of fifteen. The inspection was not yet complete—the inspector will return to review records and conduct staff interviews—but no violations were identified during this visit.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst’s (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted an annual inspection on 07/08/2025. LPA met with Gina Alvarez- Business Office Director and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. Administrator Adriane Runge arrived shortly after to assist with tour. This facility is licensed to serve ninety-seven (97) non- ambulatory resident, of which seven (7) may be bedridden. This facility may retain no more than fifteen (15) hospice residents. There were eight (8) residents under hospice care, during annual inspection. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools for the visit today and observed the following: See 809-C for continued 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Physical Plant and Environment safety: Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons and other items that could pose a danger if readily available to residents, were observed to be inaccessible to residents. LPA observed carbon monoxide detectors and smoke alarms in hallways. Smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and observed to be operational. LPA inspected six (6) rooms; of which three (3) were located in memory care. All resident bedrooms contained the required furniture, linens and lighting. Water temperatures in all grooming and bathing areas were measured to be with 105 – 120 degrees F. Facility maintains a weekly waterlog to record water temperature throughout the facility. LPA Ramirez observed postings encouraging proper hand washing etiquette in restrooms. LPA Ramirez observed grab bars near toilets and inside showers. LPA observed evacuation chairs in stairways. Food Service: LPA observed sufficient supply of nonperishable for one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days in the facility kitchen area. Soaps, detergents, and cleaning compounds were observed to be stored away from food supplies. Freezers and refrigerators were observed to be clean and within temperatures of 0 degree F (-17.7 degree C), and refrigerators with a maximum temperature of 40-degree F. (4 degree C). LPA observed facility weekly and daily menu, which is approved by the facility certified dietary manager. LPA observed kitchen staff preparing for lunch while wearing hair nets and gloves. LPA observed several dining room servers disinfecting tables and counters while wearing gloves and hair nets. Planned Activities: LPA observed a calendar for October of 2025 with various activities and outings for residents. LPA observed sufficient outdoor space in both assisted living section and in memory care. Residents Rights-Information: LPA observed the following postings in common areas throughout the facility: Complaint Poster (PUB 475), personal rights, and nondiscrimination notice. LPA Ramirez observed facility computers with internet access and a facility land line. Residents with Special Needs: LPA observed signs posted indicating “No smoking - Oxygen in Use” in various locations of the facility. LPA observed several oxygen tanks in resident rooms secured in stands. Knives, sharps or other items that could pose a danger to residents with dementia, were observed to be inaccessible. Auditory devices and delay egress perimeters were observed to be in working order. Due to time constraints, LPA Ramirez will return at a later time to complete record review and interviews; required for annual inspection. No deficiencies were cited at this time. The Exit interview was conducted with Administrator Adriane Runge. A copy of this report was provided.
2025-09-03Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
An investigator responded to a complaint that staff injured a resident during a transfer using a mechanical lift. The investigation found that the lift malfunctioned, its wheels got stuck, and the resident fell onto the bed; part of the lift grazed the resident's forehead and they sustained a head injury that caused bleeding, prompting a 911 call. The facility was cited and issued a $500 penalty for this incident, and investigators also found that one staff member was using the lift without required training.
“Resident #1 (R1) sustained injuries to their head on 11/11/2024 during staff assistance with a transfer using a hoyer lift. R1 head laceration (J staples), and a large scalp hematoma as a result.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
The Investigation Revealed the Following: Allegation: Facility staff caused injuries to resident during a transfer. It is alleged that R1 sustained injuries to their head during a transfer using a Hoyer Lift, that was assisted by S2 and S3. LPA conducted interviews with staff and 3 out of 6 staff confirmed the above allegation. S2 and S3 both confirmed the above allegation and stated that when they were using the hoyer lift, it was giving them trouble, the wheels got stuck and R1 landed on their bed from the hoyer lift. Part of the hoyer lift, grazed R1's forehead and R1 landed on her pillow, moments later blood was observed on the pillow and it was seen that R1 had an injury to the back of their head, 911 was called immediately. LPA reviewed in-service training for staff on usage of hoyer lift and it was explained to LPA by S1 that there is no documentation or proof that training prior to this incident was held. Since incident there have been 2 in-service training's dated 11/27/2024 and 12/4/2024, during staff interviews it was revealed that S6 has not received training for the hoyer lift and use the hoyer lift to assist residents with transfers. LPA interviewed residents and 8 out of 10 residents denied the allegation and stated they have never sustained injuries while being assisted nor have the witnessed/heard of any other resident sustaining an injury while being provided assistance/transfer. 2 of the 10 residents interviewed have a cognitive impairment that did not allow for successful interview. Based on observations and interviews which were conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 1 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Immediate Civil Penalties will be issued today, in the amount of $500.00 due to Staff caused serious injury to resident. At this time an Enhanced Civil Penalty (ECP) determination is pending in reference to Health and Safety Code 87468.1(a)(2) and may be assessed at a later date. Exit interview held and a copy of this report, appeal rights and civil penalty assessment were emailed to Adriane Runge - Executive Director.
2025-08-28Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedCitation on file
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that staff members injured a resident while operating a mechanical lift during a transfer—the lift malfunctioned, the resident fell onto the bed, and the lift grazed the resident's forehead; the resident hit the back of their head on a pillow and bled, requiring a 911 call. The investigation also found that the facility had not provided proper training on lift use to all staff before this incident, and at least one staff member was operating the lift without any documented training. The facility was issued a $500 penalty and required to provide training to staff.
Substantiated — the state found a violation and issued a citation. Full citation details are on file with the state.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
The Investigation Revealed the Following: Allegation: Facility staff caused injuries to resident during a transfer. It is alleged that R1 sustained injuries to their head during a transfer using a Hoyer Lift, that was assisted by S2 and S3. LPA conducted interviews with staff and 3 out of 6 staff confirmed the above allegation. S2 and S3 both confirmed the above allegation and stated that when they were using the hoyer lift, it was giving them trouble, the wheels got stuck and R1 landed on their bed from the hoyer lift. Part of the hoyer lift, grazed R1's forehead and R1 landed on her pillow, moments later blood was observed on the pillow and it was seen that R1 had an injury to the back of their head, 911 was called immediately. LPA reviewed in-service training for staff on usage of hoyer lift and it was explained to LPA by S1 that there is no documentation or proof that training prior to this incident was held. Since incident there have been 2 in-service training's dated 11/27/2024 and 12/4/2024, during staff interviews it was revealed that S6 has not received training for the hoyer lift and use the hoyer lift to assist residents with transfers. LPA interviewed residents and 8 out of 10 residents denied the allegation and stated they have never sustained injuries while being assisted nor have the witnessed/heard of any other resident sustaining an injury while being provided assistance/transfer. 2 of the 10 residents interviewed have a cognitive impairment that did not allow for successful interview. Based on observations and interviews which were conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 1 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Immediate Civil Penalties were issued on 12/28/24, in the amount of $500.00 due to Staff caused serious injury to resident. At this time an Enhanced Civil Penalty (ECP) determination is pending in reference to Health and Safety Code 1569.49(f) and may be assessed at a later date. Exit interview held and a copy of this report, appeal rights and civil penalty assessment were provided to Adriane Runge - Executive Director.
2025-08-08Other VisitType B · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
During a follow-up case management visit, inspectors found that staff had not received proper training on how to use a mechanical lift device, which had resulted in a resident being injured. Staff training records on file did not document any instruction on safe operation of the lift equipment. The facility was cited for this lack of training.
“During the course of a complaint investigation for complaint # 28-AS-20241113164508, LPA reviewed staff files and did not observe any training's on file on how to utilize a hoyer lift properly while assisting residents.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted a Case Management visit. LPA met Angela Boyd - Health Services Director and discussed the purpose of this visit. During the course of a complaint investigation for complaint # 28-AS-20241113164508, it was discovered that the administrator at the time of the complaint investigation, did not ensure that staff were properly trained on how to operate a hoyer lift , which resulted in injuries to a resident in care. During investigation of above referenced complaint LPA reviewed staff files and did not observe any training's on file on how to utilize a hoyer lift properly while assisting residents (citations were previously issued during complaint investigation dated 12/18/2024 for injuries resident sustained, however, lack of training was not addressed at that time). Today LPA is addressing the and issuing the deficiency. Deficiency lack of training is being issued please refer to the LIC809 - D page for details. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report and appeals rights were emailed.
2025-08-01Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found no evidence that staff failed to lock medications, falsified medication records, failed to supervise residents taking medication, or left residents in soiled diapers for extended periods. Staff and residents interviewed confirmed that medications are securely stored and supervised, and that incontinence care is provided promptly.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Allegation: Staff did not ensure centrally stored medication was locked and inaccessible to residents. It has been alleged that staff misplace residents’ medication which would later be found inside the residents’ rooms. Staff interviews revealed that residents medications are locked inside a medication cart which is stored inside the locked medication room. Interviewed staff indicated that residents’ medications are not misplaced nor later found in residents’ rooms. Interviewed staff indicated that they have not received any complaints/concerns pertaining to this matter. Resident interviews revealed that staff provide residents with their medication daily and in a timely manner. Interviewed residents indicated that staff provide supervision when medication is provided to ensure the medication is consumed by the resident. Interviewed residents indicated that they do not have direct access to medication as the medication is centrally stored inside a medication cart and is inaccessible to residents. Interviews do not corroborate this allegation. Allegation: Staff falsified medication records. It has been alleged that staff misplaced a R-1’s Oxycodone pill and rather than reporting the pill missing, staff allegedly “falsely reporting it as a miscount”. Staff interviews revealed that on 04/26/25, R-1's Oxycodone pill #16 was discovered inside the medication cart and not inside the bubble pack. Interviewed staff indicated that the foil of R-1's bubble pack for Oxycodone somehow was broken/punctured under pill #16 which caused it to fall out of the medication bubble pack and onto the medication cart. Staff interviews revealed that R-1’s Oxycodone pill #16 medication was not missing as it was found inside the medication cart, therefore, per staff interviews, this medication was not reported as a “miscount”. Interviewed staff indicated that controlled medications are counted by staff on a daily basis and are logged on the controlled medication shift count. Interviewed staff indicated that R-1 takes this medication on an as needed basis and the last administration was on 03/16/25. Interviewed staff indicated that they have not received any complaints/concerns pertaining to this matter. Interviews and reviewed documentation do not corroborate this allegation. Refer to LIC 9099C for the continuation of this report. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Allegation: Staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident missing their medication dosage. It has been alleged that staff dispensed a diabetic medication to a resident (R-2) but did not ensure that the resident (R-2) consumed it and left the room. Staff interviews revealed that staff provide adequate supervision when administering residents’ medication. Interviewed staff indicated that R-2 takes their medication in front of the medication technician. Interviewed staff indicated that they have not found any unconsumed medication inside R-2’s room. Interviewed staff indicated that they have not received any complaints/concerns pertaining to this matter. Resident interviews revealed that staff administrating medication provide supervision to residents during the medication distribution to ensure residents are consuming their medication. Interviewed residents indicated that staff do not just provide them with their medication and leave. Interviewed residents indicated that they do not have any concerns pertaining to this matter. Interviews do not corroborate this allegation. Allegation: Staff left residents in soiled diapers for extended periods of time It has been alleged that staff avoided changing residents’ briefs at the end of their shift and that residents were wet, soiled and waited an additional hour and a half to be changed. Staff interviews revealed that staff do not leave residents in soiled diapers for extended periods of time. Interviewed staff indicated that they conduct rounds every (2) hours and as needed to change residents with soiled diapers. Interviewed staff indicated that they do not wait until the end of their shift to change residents’ diapers nor wait an hour and a half to change residents' diapers. Interviewed staff indicated that they have not received any complaints/concerns pertaining to this matter. Resident interviews revealed that staff provide incontinence care in a timely manner. Interviewed residents indicated that staff do not leave them in soiled diapers for an extended period of time. Interviewed residents indicated that they do not have any concerns pertaining to this matter. Interviews do not corroborate this allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to Adriane Runge (Executive Director).
2025-05-20Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found no violations. The facility was alleged to have improperly given medication without a doctor's order, treated residents roughly or yelled at them, served food with inadequate sanitation practices, and lost a resident's clothing, but interviews with residents and staff, along with medical records and facility tours, did not support these allegations.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
It is alleged staff gave R1 doses of medication without doctor’s consent. Interviews conducted with residents revealed 4 out of 7 residents stated their medication is provided as prescribed and 3 out of 7 residents were not able to provide information due to cognitive skills. Interviews with staff revealed medication technicians provide medication as prescribed by the physician. Documents review revealed, on 3/11/25 a medication clarification sheet was signed by nurse practitioner listing two orders of quetiapine, one for 25mg and another for 50mg. Medication administration record notes the same medications listed on medication clarification. Charting notes revealed, on 5/12/25 and 5/13/25 R1’s responsible party shared concerns about the medication dosage to medication technician. On 5/13/25 facility staff contacted nurse practitioner to address R1’s responsible party concerns. On 5/14/25 facility staff received new order of medication per R1’s responsible party request. Medication review did not reveal medication errors. Although the allegation may have happened the facility staff were providing medication as prescribed. Facility noted R1’s responsible party concern and address it with physician. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegations: Facility staff handled residents in a rough manner and Facility staff yelled at resident. It is alleged staff aggressively sat a resident down and yelled at another resident. Interviews conducted with residents revealed 7 out of 7 residents stated that facility staff treat them well and respectfully. Interviews with staff revealed staff have not observed any other staff treat the residents in an aggressive manner or yelling at residents. Per administrator there have not been any incidents of staff treating residents disrespectfully report it. Training on Communication; Courtesy was provided to staff #2 on 4/22/25. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . Regarding allegation: Facility staff did not observe proper food service sanitation practices. It is alleged staff serve food with dirty hands and without gloves. Interviews with residents revealed 4 out of 7 residents stated staff take measurements to observe sanitation practices and 3 out of 7 residents were unable to answer due to cognitive skills. Interviews with staff revealed staff use gloves and hairnets to serve the food provided to the residents and practice hygiene while providing care. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Interviews with staff revealed staff use gloves and hairnets to serve the food provided to the residents and practice hygiene while providing care. Training on basic hand hygiene was provided on 6/10/24 and About Infection Control and Prevention on 6/8/24 was provided to staff #2. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation: Facility staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings . It is alleged R1’s clothes have gone missing. Interviews conducted with residents revealed 3 out of 7 residents stated to take care of their personal care themselves. However, personal items have not gone missing. 1 out of 7 residents stated none of their personal belongings have gone missing. 3 out of 7 residents were unable to answer due to cognitive skills. Document review revealed R1’s personal property and valuables dated: 3/8/24 list clothing in general. However, there is not a specific number of items. During facility’s tour LPA observed R1’s room and observed R1’s clothing folded in one closet and personal belongings on another closet. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview was conducted with Adriane Rugen Administrator and a copy of this report was provided.
2024-12-18Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedCitation on file
Plain-language summary
An investigation into a complaint found that two staff members injured a resident during a transfer using a mechanical lift when the lift malfunctioned—the wheels stuck, the resident fell onto the bed, part of the lift grazed the resident's forehead, and the resident sustained a head injury that required a 911 call. The facility also had not documented training on lift use for all staff, and at least one staff member who operated the lift had not received any training. The state substantiated the complaint and issued a $500 civil penalty, with an additional penalty potentially to follow.
Substantiated — the state found a violation and issued a citation. Full citation details are on file with the state.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
The Investigation Revealed the Following: Allegation: Facility staff caused injuries to resident during a transfer. It is alleged that R1 sustained injuries to their head during a transfer using a Hoyer Lift, that was assisted by S2 and S3. LPA conducted interviews with staff and 3 out of 6 staff confirmed the above allegation. S2 and S3 both confirmed the above allegation and stated that when they were using the hoyer lift, it was giving them trouble, the wheels got stuck and R1 landed on their bed from the hoyer lift. Part of the hoyer lift, grazed R1's forehead and R1 landed on her pillow, moments later blood was observed on the pillow and it was seen that R1 had an injury to the back of their head, 911 was called immediately. LPA reviewed in-service training for staff on usage of hoyer lift and it was explained to LPA by S1 that there is no documentation or proof that training prior to this incident was held. Since incident there have been 2 in-service training's dated 11/27/2024 and 12/4/2024, during staff interviews it was revealed that S6 has not received training for the hoyer lift and use the hoyer lift to assist residents with transfers. LPA interviewed residents and 8 out of 10 residents denied the allegation and stated they have never sustained injuries while being assisted nor have the witnessed/heard of any other resident sustaining an injury while being provided assistance/transfer. 2 of the 10 residents interviewed have a cognitive impairment that did not allow for successful interview. Based on observations and interviews which were conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 1 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Immediate Civil Penalties will be issued today, in the amount of $500.00 due to St aff caused serious injury to resident. At this time an Enhanced Civil Penalty (ECP) determination is pending in reference to Health and Safety Code 1569.49(f) and may be assessed at a later date. Exit interview held and a copy of this report, appeal rights and civil penalty assessment were provided to Adriane Runge - Executive Director.
2024-09-26Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
A routine annual inspection found the facility in compliance with state requirements across all areas reviewed, including staffing levels, resident safety, infection control, emergency preparedness, food service, and resident record-keeping. The inspector observed that fire safety equipment is in place and functional, bathrooms have appropriate safety features, staff have required certifications and training, and the facility maintains adequate supplies and properly stores medications and food. The facility is currently licensed for up to 97 non-ambulatory residents and is operating with 47 assisted living residents and 25 memory care residents.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Elizabeth Irra conducted an annual inspection visit. LPA met with Adriane Runge and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools for the visit today and observed the following: Infection Control: Facility has an Infection Control Policy (binder) in place. Operational Requirements: Facility is adhering to the operational requirements. This facility is approved for (97) non-ambulatory residents (7 of which may be bedridden and 15 of which may be under hospice). There are currently (47) residents in the assisted living facility and (25) memory care residents. Physical Plant & Environment Safety: LPA toured facility grounds. Fire smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors observed. The fire extinguishers are located throughout the facility and appear to be full (last service date 03/27/24). Signal system tested and operable. Last emergency drill was conducted on 08/29/24. Emergency evacuation chairs were observed at the stairways. Hot water temperature measured within regulations. The hot water supply measured at the following temperatures: 106.5* to 110.0*. Bathrooms have non-skid surfaces and grab bars. Staffing : Facility is adhering to staffing requirements. Refer to LIC 809C for the continuation of this report. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Personnel Records-Training : Staff files are maintained at the facility. LPA reviewed staff files for S-1 through Staff #5 (S-5). Staff have current First Aid/CPR certification. Staff have their Health Screening and Tuberculosis Screening on file. Staff are also trained on Abuse Reporting and Resident Rights. Resident Rights-Information: Resident rights are posted and included in Resident files. Planned Activities: This facility has an activity room and provides a variety of activities for the residents. Activity schedule is posted. Food Service: There are sufficient food supplies of 2-day perishable and (1) week of non-perishable items. The food is properly stored in the refrigerator. Posted menu observed. Pesticides and cleaning supplies are kept away from the food preparation areas. Kitchen is kept clean and free from rodents and other vermin. Plates, cups and utensils are kept cleaned and stored properly. Dining areas have adequate seating in both the assisted living and memory care dining rooms. Resident Records-Incident Reports: LPA reviewed Resident files for Resident #1 (R-1) through Resident #7 (R-7). Resident files are maintained at the facility. Resident files have the required documents. Admission Agreement, Physician's Report (including T.B and Ambulatory Status), Consent For Medical Treatment, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Resident Pre-Appraisal, Assessment Summary, Resident Rights were observed. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has a Disaster Preparedness manual (binder) in place. Health Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: The medications are stored and locked (medication carts) inside the medication room. Exit interview conducted, copy of appeal rights and a copy of this report was provided to Adriane Runge.
2024-07-30Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
A complaint alleged that staff left a resident on the floor for an extended period after a fall, but the investigation found no evidence to support this allegation—other residents described staff as attentive and checking on them regularly, and staff stated the resident was found and assessed immediately after falling. The resident did experience two falls in early April 2024 and was hospitalized briefly with minor injuries, but the facility's account of its response could not be contradicted by available evidence.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Residents interviewed were unable to corroborate the allegation. Residents interviewed stated that staff are attentive, and check on them often. Residents stated that if a resident fall, staff will assess them immediately. Although resident #1 experienced two falls, on 4/1/24 and 4/2/24, the standard of proof has not been met because the preponderance of the evidence does not demonstrate the facility was in violation of Title 22 regulations. Regarding the allegation that : Staff left a resident on the floor for an extended period of time after falling. The investigation revealed that resident #1 experienced a fall on 4/1/24, and on 4/2/24. Resident #1 was sent to the hospital, and was hospitalized from 4/2/24 -4/7/24. Review of hospital documents indicate that resident #1 sustained minor injuries due to fall(s). Administrator and staff interviewed denied the allegation. They stated that residents are checked on every two hours, or more frequently according to their care needs. Staff stated that when resident #1 fell, he was found by staff, assessed, and sent to the hospital. Staff stated that resident #1 was not left on the floor for an extended period of time. Residents interviewed were unable to corroborate the allegation. Residents interviewed stated that staff are attentive, and check on them often. sw3 Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted and a copy this report was provided.
2024-02-12Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
An investigator looked into complaints that the facility wasn't providing a safe environment, adequate supervision, proper feeding and hydration, and that motion-sensor devices weren't working. Interviews with staff, residents, and observations of the facility found no evidence to support these complaints — all five residents interviewed said they felt safe, were properly supervised, received adequate food and drink, and confirmed the sensor devices were working. The complaints could not be substantiated.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Regarding the allegation that : Facility does not provide a safe environment for resident. The investigation consisted of interview(s) with Administrator, Staff #1 - Staff #4, and Resident #1 - Resident #5. Administrator and staff interviewed stated that the facility does provide a safe environment for resident(s). Staff interviewed stated that resident(s) are assessed upon admission and are regularly observed for changes in condition. Residents interviewed were unable to corroborate the allegation. Five out of five residents interviewed stated that the facility does provide them with a safe environment. Regarding the allegation that : Facility staff are not adequately providing resident assistance and supervision while in care. Administrator and staff interviewed stated that staff are providing adequate assistance and supervision. Staff interviewed stated that they check on residents frequently, and they assist residents according to the resident(s) care plan. Residents interviewed were unable to corroborate the allegation. Five out of five residents interviewed stated that staff are providing them with assistance and supervision. Regarding the allegation that : Facility staff are not ensuring that resident is adequately fed while in care, and facility staff are not ensuring that resident is adequately hydrated while in care. Administrator and staff interviewed, stated that the staff do ensure that resident(s) are adequately fed and hydrated while in care. They said that the facility provides a sufficient amount of food and beverages to resident(s) and they assist resident(s) with eating and drinking, if they need assistance. Residents interviewed were unable to corroborate the allegation. Five out of five residents interviewed stated that staff do ensure that they are receiving enough food and hydration at the facility. Regarding the allegation that : Resident's sensor alert device was not working properly. Administrator and staff interviewed stated that the sensor alert devices are in resident room(s) in memory care. Staff interviewed stated that the sensors detect motion, and alert the staff if a resident falls, or is moving around in the room. Staff interviewed stated that the devices are working properly. Residents interviewed were unable to corroborate the allegation. Five out of five residents interviewed stated that that the sensor alert devices are working properly. LPA observed that the sensor alert devices are working properly. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of the report was provided.
2023-11-21Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedType A · 1 finding
Plain-language summary
A complaint investigation found that the facility continued giving a resident medications that should have been discontinued and failed to update the resident's medication list when they returned to the facility. The facility has since stopped the incorrect medications and corrected the medication records, and submitted a required incident report to the state. Deficiencies were cited for these violations.
“This requirement was not being met as evidenced by: Resident #1 was still being administered the following medications : Losartan Potassium 25 mg tab, Melatonin 3 mg tab, it should have been d/c upon discharge from hospital in August 2023. This poses a health and safety risk to residents in care.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Administrator, and Health Services Director stated that the facility has discontinued the medication(s) that should no longer be administered to resident #1, and has made corrections to medication list that had not been made upon resident #1's return to the facility. The facility also sent a special incident report to Community Care Licensing as required. Based on record review and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED . Deficiencies are being cited according to California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and Health and Safety Code. An exit interview was conducted with Ms. Hill. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.
2023-10-27Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
During a routine annual inspection, inspectors toured the facility, reviewed resident and staff files, checked medications and food supplies, and interviewed staff and residents; they found no deficiencies. The facility met all physical plant requirements including proper water temperature, working smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, secure storage of medications and cleaning supplies, adequate bedding and furniture, and accessible grab bars and non-skid mats in bathrooms.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Rea conducted an unannounced annual visit using the Inspection Tool. LPA met with Executive Director Janette Hill and explained the reason for the visit. Physical Plant was toured, medications, staff and resident files, were reviewed, food supply was inspected, and a sample of staff and residents were interviewed. LPA Rea and Ms. Hill toured the facility including common areas and a random sample of resident rooms. There are multiple shaded seating areas for the residents throughout the facility patio area. Passageways and exits are free of obstruction. The water temperature was tested in a random selection of resident bedrooms and measured between 112.4 F - 118.8 F which is within the required 105 F - 120 F degrees. Grab bars and non-skid mats were observed in resident bathrooms. Resident bedrooms have the required furniture such as bed frames, dressers, lamps and chairs. Bedrooms also have sufficient closet space. Resident beds have the required linen and the linen is in good condition. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were observed in resident rooms and were tested and operable during the visit. There are multiple fire extinguishers located throughout the facility. Kitchen appliances are clean and were operating at the time of the visit. Sharps are locked and are inaccessible to residents. Cleaning supplies and disinfectants are locked and are inaccessible to the residents. LPA observed a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food supply. Medications were reviewed and appeared to be administered as prescribed. Resident and Staff files have all the required documentation. Ms. Hill stated that the facility conducted an earthquake/fire drill on 8/2/23. There were no deficiencies observed on today's visit. Exit interview conducted and report was given to Ms. Hill.
2023-07-25Complaint InvestigationSubstantiatedCitation on file
Plain-language summary
A family member complained that they did not receive written notice before the facility evicted their relative. The facility said it ended the resident's stay because the resident's swallowing difficulties made it unsafe to care for them at the facility, but investigators found that the facility did not provide the required written eviction notice and substantiated the complaint. The resident's last health assessment was more than two years before the eviction.
Substantiated — the state found a violation and issued a citation. Full citation details are on file with the state.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Resident #1's family member stated that they did not receive a written eviction notice from the facility. Administrator and Health Services Director, stated that due to a change in resident #1's condition, which is making it difficult for resident #1 to swallow foods and medication, the facility determined that they could no longer meet resident #1's needs. LPA observed that resident #1 was last reassessed on 6/3/23. Based on record review and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED . Deficiencies are being cited according to California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and Health and Safety Code. An exit interview was conducted with Ms. Hill. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.
3 older inspections from 2021 are not shown above.
Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.
Other facilities in Los Angeles County.
Other memory care facilities in Los Angeles County with similar care offerings.
Free · Tour Prep
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
Other memory care options nearby.
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.
