Seabright Assisted Living and Memory Care.
Seabright Assisted Living and Memory Care is Ranked in the top 19% of California memory care with 2 CDSS citations on record; last inspected Apr 2026.

A small home, reviewed on public record.
Compared to 152 California facilities with a similar number of beds.
RCFE memory care · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.
among peers to rank.
Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.
FACILITY WATCH · BETA
Seabright Assisted Living and Memory Care has 2 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.
New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.
Citation history, plotted month by month.
2 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.
Finding distribution
2 total · 36 monthsScope × Severity (CMS A–L)
The rules that apply to this facility.
State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.
Plain language
Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.
Ask on tour
“Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?”
Questions to ask before you visit.
A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Seabright Assisted Living and Memory Care's record and state requirements.
The facility has 2 serious citations on file across all inspections — can you provide your corrective-action plan for each cited item, and show families any documentation of remediation steps taken?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Two complaints are on file with CDSS — were any substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
The facility is licensed for only 6 beds and is designated as a memory-care program — can you explain how the small size shapes the care model and what protocols are in place to ensure consistent dementia-care practice with limited capacity?
Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.
Every inspection visit, verbatim.
4 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.
2026-04-16Annual Compliance VisitType A · 2 findings
Plain-language summary
During an unannounced annual inspection on April 27, 2026, inspectors found the facility clean, safe, and properly equipped, with adequate food supplies and working safety systems. Two violations were cited: a jug of laundry detergent was left accessible to residents in an unsecured garage (which the administrator immediately removed), and two staff members had valid background clearances that were not properly associated with the facility (which was corrected during the visit). The facility was assessed a $1,000 civil penalty.
“Based on LPA observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in ensuring toxic chemicals were secrued and inaccessible to residents, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to all persons in care. POC Due Date: 04/30/2026 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Licensee immediately moved the accessible chemicals to a locked storage closet. Licensee will switch the doorknob of the garage door so that it can be locked and inaccessible to residents. Licensee will additionally conduct a review/retraining with staff on procedures and regulations pertaining to toxic items storage. Licensee will submit proof to LPA by POC due date of the doorknob change and proof of training/review with staff.”
“Based on file review and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in ensuring two (2) staff members had their background clearances associated to the facility prior to working at the facility, which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to all persons in care. POC Due Date: 04/30/2026 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Licensee immediately associated the two (2) staff members during LPA's visit. Licensee will conduct routine review of the roster to ensure it is up to date. Licensee will conduct review of regulation 87355 and submit proof to LPA by POC due date.”
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced, required Annual Inspection. The facility file and personnel report was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Angelica Escalante. Administrator Katherine Sandez arrived within 30 minutes of LPA's arrival. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, one (1) of which may be bedridden. Bedridden may reside in bedroom #3. Additionally, the facility is approved for three (3) hospice waivers. During today’s inspection there were six (6) residents in care, with three (3) currently on hospice. LPA and Administrator Sandez toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant: kitchen sink was 110F. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. LPA noted a variety of games and activities present in the living room area. The facility contained at least two (2) days of perishable food, and at least seven (7) days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. Knives were locked and inaccessible to residents. [Continued on LIC 809-C] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [Continued from LIC 809] The hallway closet containing chemicals was locked, however, as LPA toured the garage area, a full jug of laundry detergent was present beside the door inside the garage. The door to the garage was not secured and was accessible to residents in care. Administrator Sandez immediately moved the jug from the garage to the locked storage cabinet. One type A deficiency was cited for the accessible chemical. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per Administrator Sandez, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguisher was purchased within the last 12 months, dated for May 2025. Fireplace had an appropriate screen in place. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. The backyard area offered plenty of space for residents and walkways were free of obstructions and trip hazards. LPA interviewed two (2) staff and one (1) client, and interviews did not reveal any licensing or regulatory concerns. LPA reviewed facility records and confidential records were stored in locked areas. LPA noted that the files were well organized and routinely updated. While reviewing staff records, LPA noted that two (2) staff members (identified as S1 and S2) were not associated to the facility. Further review of the Guardian background check system revealed S1 and S2 had eligible clearances, just that they weren't associated to this facility. One type A Deficiency is being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 on the attached LIC 809-D for the two (2) staff working without having their clearances associated to the facility. A Civil Penalty was assessed for the total amount of $1,000.00 and details are noted on the attached LIC 421BG form. S1 and S2 were able to be associated during the visit. Two (2) deficiencies were cited during the inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Sandez to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided. Their signature below confirms receipt of these documents.
2025-09-10Complaint InvestigationUnsubstantiatedNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was a complaint investigation into whether the facility unlawfully evicted a resident or failed to supervise them. On June 7, 2025, a resident with advanced dementia who had expressed not wanting to live at the facility packed belongings and left in an unknown vehicle; the investigation could not find sufficient evidence to prove the facility either forced them to leave or failed to supervise them, so the complaint was unsubstantiated.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Interviews with internal and external sources revealed that R1 does not have a responsible party. Review of R1’s medical assessment dated April 4, 2025, revealed that R1 had a primary diagnosis of Senile Degeneration of the Brain (Dementia). Per the assessment, R1’s severe cognitive impairment limits their ability to self-manage, they require assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), and they could leave the facility unassisted, but they frequently wander and require supervision. R1 could not be used as a reliable historian to aid in this investigation due to their baseline memory loss. Interviews revealed that R1 stated on multiple occasions that they do not want to live at the facility. Interviews revealed that on June 7, 2025, R1 used their cellphone to make a phone call and arrange transportation to leave the facility. Staff then witnessed R1 packing up their personal belongings and leave in an unknown vehicle from the facility. Based on interviews and records review, the investigation did not yield a preponderance of evidence to conclude that the licensee conducted an unlawful eviction and lack of supervision resulted in resident eloping. Based on the foregoing, the allegations are unsubstantiated. This finding means that although the allegations may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Katherine Sandez , to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.
2025-03-28Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
During an unannounced annual inspection, the facility was found to meet all requirements for safety, cleanliness, food storage, medications, and emergency equipment. The building had clear pathways, working doors and windows, proper furnishings, and adequate supplies for dining, laundry, and resident activities. No deficiencies were cited.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was greeted by, identified themselves to and discussed the purpose of the visit with Caregiver Natalia Marquez. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents of which one (1) may be bedridden in bedroom #3. Hospice waiver for three (3). Administrator Katherine Sandez arrived later during the visit. LPA with Administrator Sandez toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. The facility contained at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per Administrator Sandez, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Sandez to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.
2024-05-15Annual Compliance VisitNo findings
Plain-language summary
This was a routine annual inspection of the facility, and no violations were found. The inspector confirmed the facility was clean and safe, with proper storage of medications and food, working equipment and safety devices, required staffing documentation, and adequate space and supplies for residents. The facility is currently caring for five residents at its licensed capacity of six.
Read raw inspector notesClose inspector notes
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by and discussed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Celeste Valdivia. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, one (1) of whom may be bedridden in room number 3 only. During today’s inspection there were five (5) residents in care. LPA and Caregiver Celeste Valdivia toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility contained at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per Caregiver Celeste Valdivia, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed staff and clients, and reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Celeste Valdivia to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.
1 older inspection from 2022 are not shown in the free view.
1 older inspection from 2022 are not shown in the free view.
Family reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience
More options in neighboring cities
Licensed memory care in other cities within this county region — useful when your search radius crosses city limits.
Other facilities under this operator
Alara Health Services Inc — as recorded on state license extracts. Each facility still has its own inspection history.