California · San Francisco

Ivy Park at Cathedral Hill.

RCFE210 bedsDementia-trained staff(415) 921-1552
Facility · San Francisco
A 210-bed RCFE with 10 citations on file.
Licensed beds
210
Last inspection
May 2026
Last citation
Feb 2026
Operated by
Coventry Subtenant Lp;oakmont Management Group Llc
Snapshot

A large home, reviewed on public record.

Peer Comparison

Compared to 123 California facilities with a similar number of beds.

RCFE · 36-month window. Higher percentile = better performance on inspection record. Source: California Dept. of Social Services · Community Care Licensing.

Severity rank
25th%
Weighted citations per bed.
peer median
0
100
Repeat rank
Not enough repeat citations
among peers to rank.
Repeat deficiencies as share of total.
Frequency rank
52nd%
Deficiencies per inspection.
peer median
0
100

Rankings based on 36-month CDSS inspection data. Severity and frequency: fewer citations = higher percentile. Repeat rate: lower repeat citation share = higher percentile.

FACILITY WATCH · FREE

Ivy Park at Cathedral Hill has 10 citations on record. Know the moment anything changes.

New findings, complaint investigations, or status changes — emailed to you free.

Where are you in the process? (optional)

Save for comparison:
The Record

Citation history, plotted month by month.

10 deficiencies on record. Each bar is a month with a citation.

Peer median 1 · dashed
Last citation: FEB 2026. Compared against peer median (dashed).
peer median
FEB 2026
Jul 2024as of Jun 2026

Finding distribution

9 total · 36 months

Scope × Severity (CMS A–L)

Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Sev 4 · IJ
J
K
L
Sev 3
G4
H
I
Sev 2
D5
E
F
Sev 1
A
B
C
The Rulebook

The rules that apply to this facility.

State requirements with the exact regulation citation, plain-language explanation, and a question to ask on tour. Rules this facility has been cited for appear first.

What dementia-care training must staff complete?22 CCR §87705 / HSC §1569.625
+
Plain language

Because a facility markets dementia or Alzheimer's care, state law mandates higher training standards: 12 hours of initial dementia training (6 hours before a staff member works independently with residents, 6 more within the first 4 weeks), 8 hours of annual dementia in-service every year thereafter, and an administrator must include 8 hours of dementia-specific continuing education in every 2-year recertification cycle. Training must cover individualized care plans, behavioral expressions, appropriate supervision, and the facility's dementia care philosophy.

Ask on tour

Can you show me each direct-care staffer's most recent dementia training certificate, and tell me when their next refresher is due?

Tour Prep

Questions to ask before you visit.

A short pre-tour checklist tailored to Ivy Park at Cathedral Hill's record and state requirements.

01 /

The facility has 8 serious citations on file across all inspections — can you provide your corrective-action plan for each cited item, and show families any documentation of remediation steps taken?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

02 /

18 complaints are on file with CDSS — were any substantiated, and what remediation did the facility take in response to substantiated findings?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

03 /

The most recent inspection on 2026-02-26 resulted in deficiency findings — can you provide the deficiency notice and walk families through the specific corrective actions taken since that visit?

Ask the operator on tour. Take notes and compare answers across facilities you visit.

Full Inspection Record

Every inspection visit, verbatim.

27 inspections in the public record, most recent first. Click any row to expand — cited rows open automatically.

27
reports on file
10
total deficiencies
4
severe (Type A)
2026-05-13
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
Read raw inspector notes

On 05/13/2026, San Bruno Regional Office conducted a non-compliance conference meeting with Chief Operations Officer, Matt Stevenson, Scott Carlson, Senior Vice President of Operations, Jenn Sato, Senior Vice President of Operations, Patricia Murphy, Regional Director of Operations, Safoora Ahmed, Vice President of Memory Care and Programming, Kevin Wrigley, Vice President of Regulatory, and Chris Schuster, Executive Director, and Joel Goldman, Partner at Hanson Bridgett LLP. Present in the meeting were Regional Manage Jackie Jin, Licensing Program Manager Brenda Chan, and Licensing Program Analyst John Calandra . During the non-compliance meeting, the following serious violations were discussed: 87465(h) Incidental Medical and Dental, 87466 Observation of Resident, 87405(a) Administrator Qualifications and Duties, 87463(a) Reappraisals, 87468.2(a)(4) Additional Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, 87468.1(a)(2) and 87468.1(a)(6) Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, 1569.312(a) Basic Services, and 87411(a) Personnel Requirements. During this meeting, the compliance plan was developed and discussed with the licensee which includes more frequent monitoring inspection visits to ensure compliance with this compliance plan and Title 22 Regulations for 2 years. Licensee was provided the link below for resources and guidance to improve facility operations: https://www.cdss.ca.gov/inforesources/community-care/resource-guide-for-providers . This report was reviewed with Chief Operations Officer, Matt Stevenson, Scott Carlson, Senior Vice President of Operations, Jenn Sato, Senior Vice President of Operations, Patricia Murphy, Regional Director of Operations, Safoora Ahmed, Vice President of Memory Care and Programming, Kevin Wrigley, Vice President of Regulatory, and Chris Schuster, Executive Director, and Joel Goldman, Partner at Hanson Bridgett LLP. A copy of the report was provided.

2026-02-26
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

On February 26, 2026, the state completed its annual routine inspection of the facility and found no violations. Inspectors checked the building's safety systems (fire alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, fire extinguishers), bathrooms, bedrooms, food storage, first aid supplies, and staff and resident records—all met requirements. The facility maintains proper precautions including locked storage for medications and hazardous materials, accessible grab bars and non-slip flooring in bathrooms, and adequate emergency food supplies.

Read raw inspector notes

On 2/26/2026, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility to complete the 1-year required inspection. LPA Calandra was greeted by Kelly Phillips, Health Services Director and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the physical plant. This is a five story building with 180 bedrooms, 180 bathrooms, common spaces, a backyard, and memory care unit. No accessible bodies of water or hazards were observed. LPA toured random rooms. All rooms had the required furniture and sufficient lighting. All bathrooms had anti-skid flooring and floor mats and grab bars. The facility's fire alarm and Carbon Monoxide detectors were observed to be functioning properly and according to the facility's maintenance director were directly connected to the San Francisco Fire Department. The facility's fire extinguishers were observed to be fully charged and last checked on 10/27/2025. The facility had the required 7 days of non perishables and 2 days of perishables on site. No food was expired. The facility's first aid kit was observed to have the required items. All sharp objects, soap, detergent, and poisons were observed to be locked and in-accessible to persons in care. LPA reviewed 6 staff and 5 resident files during yesterday's visit. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided to the facility representative.

2026-02-25
Complaint Investigation
Type A · 1 finding

Plain-language summary

During the facility's routine annual inspection on February 25, 2026, inspectors found that one resident's medication was ordered by a physician but the actual medication was not present in the facility's centrally stored medication room. The rest of the facility, including its buildings, bathrooms, temperature, lighting, and most medications, met requirements, and all resident and staff files reviewed were complete. The inspection is still ongoing and the facility was cited for the missing medication.

Type A22 CCR §87465(h)(5)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87465(h)(5)

Based on observation, Licensee had a physician's order for R1's medication but did not have the physical medication for R1, which is an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Read raw inspector notes

On 2/25/2026, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility to conduct the Annual 1-year required inspection. LPA Calandra was greeted by Kelly Phillips, Health Services Director and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Calandra toured the physical plant. This is a five story building that consists of 180 bedrooms and 180 bathrooms. All bedrooms had sufficient lighting and all the required items. No accessible bodies of water or hazards were observed. Bathrooms were observed to have the required grab bars and anti-skid mats. The backyard was clear from obstructions. The facility was maintained at a comfortable temperature of 70 degrees Fahrenheit. A review of Centrally stored medications indicated that medications for most residents were properly labeled with instructions on dosage and times of day and matched the Centrally Stored Medication records(CSMR) kept at the facility. During the inspection, LPA observed that the facility had a physician's order for R1's medication but the physical medication was not present in the Centrally Stored Medications Room. LPA reviewed 5 resident files and 6 staff files. All were observed to be complete. The Annual Inspection will be completed at a later date. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Deficiencies are cited under the California Code of Regulations. Failure to correct the deficiencies by the POC due date may result in Civil Penalties. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report along with Appeal Rights were provided.

2026-02-18
Complaint Investigation
Unsubstantiated
No findings
Inspector · John Calandra

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation looked into allegations that a resident's clothing and bedding went missing and that medical appointments were missed. The facility showed it takes steps to protect residents' belongings by securing storage and labeling items, and it has a policy to replace or reimburse for lost items; regarding missed appointments, the resident's family arranges most of them, and staff documented that the resident sometimes refused to attend even after being encouraged to go. The investigator found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations.

Read raw inspector notes

Complaint alleged that clothing, shoes, and bedding have gone missing from R1's room and have not been returned or misplaced by the Licensee. Based on interviews of the Administrator and staff, the facility made reasonable efforts to safeguard R1's property by providing a secured room and by labeling R1's articles of clothing and other items. In addition, the Licensee found/returned or in some cases, replaced any missing items or provided reimbursement per their theft and loss policy. Complaint alleged that resident had missed several medical appointments. Based on interviews of staff, R1's responsible party takes them to medical appointments. In addition, many of R1's appointments take place inside of the facility. On some occasions, R1 has refused to go to their medical appointments and facility staff have talked to R1 about it but R1 has still refused. Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was provided to the facility representatives.

2026-01-29
Other Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

On January 29, 2026, state licensing staff conducted a follow-up visit after a resident died by suicide in their room; staff found the resident unresponsive and called 911. The resident was independent and did not receive medication assistance or other care services from the facility. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection.

Read raw inspector notes

On 1/29/2026, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra, arrived at the facility to follow up on a self-reported incident involving a resident, R1 who was reported to have taken their own life. LPA Calandra was greeted by Kelly Philips, Health Services Director and explained the purpose of the visit. According to the Administrator, Chris Schuster and Kelly Philips, Health Services Director, R1 was found unresponsive in their own room by staff. R1 was reported to be completely independent (did not receive medication assistance or any other types of services) and kept to themselves. On the day of the incident, a member of their Health Services team called 911 who came to the facility and are currently investigating the situation. During the visit, LPA interviewed staff and obtained the following records: staff self-attestations of the event LIC 602: Physician's report Appraisal of Needs and Services LPA requested copies of the following documents by 2/6/2026: Incident Reports submitted regarding R1 R1's care notes No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided to the facility representative.

2025-12-23
Other Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

On December 23, 2025, a state licensing analyst visited the facility to deliver an updated inspection report from an earlier visit in October 2025. No deficiencies were found during this visit, and the facility administrator received a copy of the updated report.

Read raw inspector notes

On 12/23/2025, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility to deliver an Amended report originally delivered on 10/19/2025. LPA Calandra was greeted by Chris Schuster, Executive Director/Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. Licensee surrendered the original copy of the report. No deficiencies cited during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided to the facility representative.

2025-12-23
Complaint Investigation
No findings

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that the facility admitted a resident identified as a fall risk but failed to create a fall prevention plan for that person; this violation was cited in October 2025 and corrected by the time of the follow-up visit in December 2025. The facility has submitted a plan to prevent similar issues in the future.

Read raw inspector notes

On 12/23/2025, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility for the purpose of following up on a complaint received by the Department on 7/11/2025. LPA Calandra was greeted by Chris Schuster, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, the Department learned that the facility had admitted R1 who was considered a fall risk but did not create a fall prevention plan to meet R1’s needs. A Type B citation was provided for this deficiency. The Licensee was cited for this deficiency on 10/13/2025. This case management is in regards to the complaint #14-AS-20250711142309. A Plan of Correction has already been provided for this citation. Deficiency cleared during visit. Deficiencies are cited under the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiencies by the due date may result in civil penalties. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report along with Appeal Rights was provided.

2025-12-18
Other Visit
Type B · 1 finding

Plain-language summary

During a complaint investigation in December 2025, inspectors found that a family member brought medications to the facility without a doctor's order, and staff stored them without logging them or checking with the doctor about whether the resident should receive them. When the resident didn't get these medications, the facility failed to provide safe care. The facility received a citation for this violation.

Type B22 CCR §87468.2(a)(4)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87468.2(a)(4)

Based on interviews the Licensee did not ensure R1 was provided care, supervision, and services that met their individual needs when the Licensee did not contact R1's primary care physician upon receipt of their medications, which is a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Read raw inspector notes

On 12/18/2025, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra made an unannounced visit in regards to a complaint received by the Department on 10/14/2025. LPA Calandra was greeted by Chris Schuster, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, the Department learned that R1's responsible party provided medications that the Licensee did not have a physician's order for. The Licensee placed said medications in their Centrally Stored Medications room but did not log the medications nor contact the physician of R1 to ask about the medications. Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment per Title 22. When R1 was not provided the medications, R1 was not accorded safe, healthful, and comfortable accommodations. A Type B citation was provided for this deficiency. Deficiencies are cited under the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct said deficiencies result in Civil Penalties. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report along with Appeal Rights.

2025-10-13
Other Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

On October 13, 2025, the state conducted a management change visit to review the facility's transition to a new administrator. The facility was asked to submit updated documentation including the new administrator's credentials, certificates, and emergency plans by October 17, 2025, and no violations were found during the visit.

Read raw inspector notes

On 10/13/2025, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility to conduct a Case Management visit in regards to a Change in Management request. LPA Calandra was greeted by Kelly Phillips, Health Services Director and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Calandra requested the following documents by 10/17/2025: - Updated LIC 200 with new administrator name. -LIC 501-Personnel Report -LIC 503-Health Screening Report -Copy of photo ID -Copy of current Administrator Certificate -Copy of First Aid/CPR Certificate -Fingerprint clearance. -Updated LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan -Updated LIC 9282 Infection Control Plan -If you signed the hospice waiver request, please submit new request for new administrator. -Board Resolution Letter(Letter appointing the new administrator from the Board) No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted. This report was reviewed with facility representative and a copy provided.

2025-10-13
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
Inspector · John Calandra

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that the facility failed to file written reports for 9 out of 10 falls involving a resident within the required 7-day timeframe. The state issued an immediate civil penalty of $500 and indicated that additional penalties may be assessed as the investigation continues.

Read raw inspector notes

Complaint also alleged that facility staff are not reporting incidents involving residents as necessary. Based on interview and document review, there were several occasions in which R1 fell but the Licensee did not complete a written report within 7 days of the occurrence of the event for 9 out of the 10 falls. Based on information reported by and obtained from facility staff and witnesses, these allegation is substantiated. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies are cited under the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiencies by the due date may result in civil penalties. An immediate civil penalty of $500.00 was issued and a copy of the LIC 421IM was given to Chris Schuster, Administrator/Executive Director. At the time of the complaint inspection on 12/23/2025, licensee was informed that the incident is currently under review and a future civil penalty may apply based on Health and Safety Code § 1569.49. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report issued. Appeal Rights provided. Facility representative signature on this report acknowledges receipt of the Appeal Rights, found on page two of LIC 421IM.

2025-07-01
Complaint Investigation
Unsubstantiated
No findings
Inspector · Dominic Tobola
2025-03-26
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings

Plain-language summary

During an unannounced annual inspection on March 26, 2025, the facility was found to have clean and comfortable resident rooms, proper food storage and meal service with dietary accommodations, working safety equipment including evacuation chairs and fire extinguishers, and a variety of activities including exercise, therapy, and entertainment that residents were actively enjoying. Staff communication systems were in place, and residents were observed to have positive relationships with staff and management. No violations were found.

Read raw inspector notes

On 3/26/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of continuing the Annual Required - 1 Year Inspection and was greeted by Executive Director, Fili Igafo. LPA completed a tour of the remaining portions of the facility including additional resident apartments, kitchen and food storage area and facility vehicles. LPA continued on tour of the facility with staff and found all exits and doorways to be free from obstruction. Exit stairwells were all equipped with evacuation chairs and elevators were found to have current inspection permits. Resident bedrooms were found to be in a clean and comfortable condition with housekeeping and laundry services provided on a weekly basis. All resident rooms are equipped with signaling system that directs to staff pagers. There was a sufficient supply of both perishable and nonperishable foods as required by Title 22 Regulations, with food stored in the kitchen, sufficient for residents in care. Food supply is replenished multiple times per week or as needed and stored properly. Facility provides a wide variety of meal preferences and preparation while also ensuring proper dietary restrictions are followed. LPA observed the facility shuttle to be equipped with a fire extinguisher which was fully charged. The facility offers a wide variety of activities for the assisted living and memory care units and encourage residents to participate regularly. LPA observed residents participating in group exercise and discussion, individual physical therapy, and attending musical guest performances throughout the visit. Residents were observed to be very engaged in the community and found to have a positive and personable relationship with staff and Executive Director. No deficiencies cited during today's visit.

2025-02-25
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · Dominic Tobola

Plain-language summary

This was an unannounced annual inspection on February 25, 2025, and no violations were found. The facility was clean and well-maintained with functioning fire safety systems, secure storage of hazardous materials, and current staff training records; residents in the memory care unit were observed engaging with staff and participating in activities like karaoke and movies. Resident care files, medical assessments, and medication records were all in order.

Read raw inspector notes

On 2/25/2025, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Tobola conducted an unannounced Annual Required – 1 yr. inspection for this facility and was greeted by Regional Operations Specialist, Alan Fox. The facility currently provides care for 164 residents, 10 of which are receiving hospice services along with a designated memory care unit. LPA continued with a tour of the facility with staff, facility found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature with all exits free from obstruction. Resident’s bedrooms, memory care unit and resident common spaces were inspected. Fire Extinguishers located throughout the inspected portions of the building were found to be charged. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors and fire safety systems are interconnected. Cleaning supplies and other toxins are safely stored in locked closets throughout the facility, and housekeeping/maintenance rooms all of which were secured upon inspection. There was a supply of hygiene products and paper products available for residents. All resident’s bedrooms have lighting & appropriate furnishings and bedding items. Residents in the memory care unit that were awake during the inspection were observed interacting with staff, fellow residents and visitors in the common areas, or in their bedrooms resting. The facility encourages regular family visits and utilizes a wide variety of activities with LPA observing staff engaging continuously with residents, offering activities based on individualized preferences and abilities. LPA observed group karaoke and movies presented to residents along with a variety of activity supplies available. LPA found that staff and resident engagement is well practiced with activity calendars developed on a monthly basis. Residents were found to have a positive and personable relationship with staff. Continued onto LIC809-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LPA conducted a sample file review for 10 residents and found all items to be on file. LPA's found that residents Needs & Service Plans and Medical Assessments were up to date. Upon a spot check of 10 staff files, LPA found that caregiver staff have current first aid and annual training, health screenings and TB results on file. Lastly, a spot check of medications was conducted and found that all medication counts and records are in order. LPA will be conducting an annual continuation to further inspect remaining resident living quarters, kitchen and food supply and facility transportation. Executive Director, Fili Igafo's Administrator Certificate 7003332740 is currently pending for renewal but has been received by the department with application received 11/18/2024. LPA requested the following documents be sent to CCL by COB 3/11/2025: LIC 308 Designated Facility Responsibility LIC 500 Personnel Summary LIC 610 Emergency Disaster Plan Liability Insurance No deficiencies cited during the visit.

2024-12-27
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · Dominic Tobola

Plain-language summary

During an unannounced follow-up visit on December 27, 2024, inspectors reviewed three incidents from November: one resident left on a bus with a private caregiver and was safely returned home, another resident walked off the property and voluntarily returned within two hours unharmed, and a third resident sustained a femur fracture while being assisted in the shower (the exact cause could not be determined). The facility responded appropriately to each incident, including increasing supervision for the residents involved and updating care plans. No violations were cited.

Read raw inspector notes

On 12/27/2024, Licensing Program Analyst, Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of conducting a case management to follow up on several incidents reported by the facility. Incident dated 11/11/2024 indicated a resident, (R1) to have boarded onto a bus while they were on an outing with a 1:1 private caregiver from an outside agency. While under private caregiver's supervision, R1 had left on the bus alone and returned to their private family home. R1 was safely returned to the facility with R1's updated services reflecting a new 1:1 care agency. A second incident occurring 11/12/2024, indicated that a resident, (R2) had been observed by staff walking on foot and leaving the property. Staff attempted but were unable to redirect R2, with R2 continuing out into the public. R2 had voluntarily returned back to the facility by bus within approximately 2 hours with no injuries or changes of condition. Upon review of R2's records, LPA found that R2 medical records have contradicting information on whether R2 can leave unassisted or not. Medical assessment indicates R2 is able to leave the facility unassisted but not dated. LPA is requesting for the facility to update R2 medical assessment and provide a copy. Since the incident, the facility has increase R2, level of care, including 1:1 care companion. The facility was found have responded appropriately to prevent further incidents. A third incident dated 11/10/2024, indicated that a resident, (R3) had been provided a shower by two caregivers. R3 was in a shower chair with a seat harness attached. Caregiver staff reported to management that R3 was observed sliding off the shower chair. Caregiver staff responded by slowly assisting/guiding R3 to the floor for reassessment. R3 had sustained a fracture to the femur but the facility was unable to interview the resident and determine any additional findings for how the fracture occurred. LPA was informed that R3 had utilized a hoyer lift and had a history of general weakness in the knees. The facility responded immediately with R3 sent out on medical emergency and returned the same evening. LPA found that the facility responded appropriately to the incident with no determination on how the injury was sustained. Lastly, LPA and Acting Administrator, Fili Igafo discussed a previous request for a hospice waiver increase. At the time of visit, the facility is within the current hospice waiver capacity and will no longer need an increased hospice waiver or exceptions at this time. No deficiencies cited during today's visit.

2024-11-07
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · Dominic Tobola

Plain-language summary

On November 7, 2024, the Department closed an investigation into a resident's death that occurred on April 18, 2024, when staff found the resident on the floor with a plastic bag tied around their neck; the resident had expressed suicidal thoughts on March 28, 2024 and was sent for medical evaluation, but upon returning to the facility, no updated care plan was completed, no increased check-ins were documented, and no one-on-one supervision was provided despite the facility's own policy requiring it for residents expressing intent to harm themselves. The Department determined that the Health Service Director failed to reassess the resident's care needs after learning of the suicidal statements and failed to ensure the required level of supervision was in place.

Read raw inspector notes

On 11/7/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of closing an investigation conducted by the Department in regard to a self reported unusual incident report dated 4/21/2024. The incident report indicates that on 4/18/2024, staff checked on resident (R1) in their apartment, finding R1 laying on the floor with a plastic bag over (their) head, tied around (their) neck. Staff determined the resident was unresponsive. According to incident report, the hospice agency was called and then hospice instructed to call 911 due to the “unnatural death.” The Department has reviewed and gathered relevant records including facility incident reports, resident R1 needs & service plans, physician’s reports, daily chart notes and medical records related to this incident and determined the following: On 3/28/2024, R1 had indicated to their family and the facility a refusal to eat and additionally made statements of ending R1’s own life. R1’s family and the facility contacted 911 with R1 sent out for medical attention due to physical pain and suicidal statements. An updated care assessment for R1 had been completed on 3/25/2024 prior to this incident. No further care assessments were conducted after 3/28/2024 when R1 was sent out for medical assessment, or after 3/29/2024 upon R1’s return to the facility. There are no indications of increased status checks or assigning one-on-one care for R1 for preventative measures documented. Based upon the Department’s conducted interview and information gathered with the Health Service Director (S1) the following is indicated: S1 is a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) at Ivy Park. S1 duties are to oversee the care staff, conduct assessments for new and existing residents, review resident’s medication, administer medication to residents, deal with family and resident concerns, and train care staff and medical techs. S1 continues, residents are checked on every one to two hours unless the service plans states that there should be more checks. Staff will not check on a resident if the resident does not want to be checked on. Residents are given an alert pendent when they first arrive at the facility. Continued onto LIC809-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 The pendent allows the resident to call for help when they need it. There are no logs kept when a resident is checked on. When a new resident is admitted to the facility, S1 will conduct an assessment on the resident before they move in. The assessment is done to see what assistance the resident may need with their Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and their mental health status. S1 updates the service plans when a resident has a change in condition. The Department interview with S1 continued regarding R1 level of care and supervision and observations leading to R1’s death. This revealed that S1 was aware of the repeated suicidal statements made by R1 to staff and the hospice nurse. Although S1 admitted they were aware of the change of condition, S1 failed to complete a reappraisal for change in resident’s status and the need for increase status checks of R1 after repeated suicidal statements. S1 additionally indicated that residents are to receive one-on-one after indicating suicidal ideations. S1 however failed to ensure one-on-one care was provided for R1. Lastly, S1 admitted that they should have been more “on top of” R1s situation, provided more frequent checks, and provided R1 additional resources. Based upon the Department’s conducted interview and information gathered with the Executive Director (S2) the following is indicated: S2’s duties are to oversee the facility, manage the lead staff, work on the facilities’ financial, sign off on payroll for the facility, work with the facility nursing director, and approve and review incident reports. S2 continues, residents are checked on one time per shift. Caregivers can check on residents anytime during their shift as long as the resident is checked on before the end of the shift. Residents can refuse to be checked on. Residents are also given an alert pendant that they can press if they need assistance at any point in time when they have an emergency. No log is kept when a resident is checked on. When the facility accepts a new resident, an assessment completed by Health Service Director (S1) to determine the resident needs before they move into the facility. S1 also conducts a mental health evaluation to see if the resident requires memory care. The assessment is also performed to see if the resident is a fit for assisted living or memory care. S1 then reports to the care team what the new resident’s needs and level of care. After the initial assessment is performed, a second assessment is completed two weeks later to see how the resident is adjusting to the facility and determine any updated needs. A reassessment is performed every six months or when a resident has a change of condition. The facility considers a change of condition when there is a change in the resident’s baseline behavior or mental health status. Continued onto LIC899-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 The Department interview with S2 continued regarding R1 level of care and supervision and observations leading to R1’s death . S2 indicated that when a resident states that they are going to harm themselves, Health Service Director, S1 is notified, S1 speaks with the resident, and notifies the resident’s Primary Care Provider and responsible party. S1 is to remove a ny harmful objects from the resident’s apartment if necessary and update the resident’s service plan to more frequent status checks every two hours. S1 is also responsible for making a recommendation to the family for the resident to receive one-on-one care paid for by the family. The facility can provide the one-on-one care to the family at an additional cost or with the option to pay for an outside company to and provide the additional care. If a resident has suicidal thoughts or attempts, they will be placed on increased status checks and will be checked on every two hours. The facility staff will also encourage the resident to socialize in the community more with the other residents. S2 was not aware of R1 having any mental health concerns when R1 arrived at Ivy Park. However, S2 was aware that R1 was exhibiting suicidal ideations with R1’s family calling 911 in March 2024 due to R1 stating that they were going to stop eating and made statement of wanting to commit suicide. The facility responded by sending R1 to the hospital for an evaluation. S2 stated that they required S1 to update R1’s needs and services plan upon return. Additionally, S2 addressed to S1 and R1’s family that R1 needed to be placed on hospice. S2 stated that R1’s care plan was updated to have assistance with his ADL’s but was not certain if S1 updated R1’s plan to have increased checks. Based upon document review it was found that R1 had bend sent out to the hospital for evaluation on 3/28/2024 and returned 3/29/2024. Record review found that the most updated needs and service plan was dated 3/25/2024 and input on 3/27/2024, prior to R1 initially being sent out for hospital. Interview continues indicating S2 was first aware of R1’s suicidal statement in March 2024. R1 was provided room checks every two hours before R1 made suicidal statements. Room checks were not updated and with R1 still provided room checks every two hours after R1 made his suicidal statements. S2 discussed one-on-one care with R1’s family but R1 never received the one-on-one care. On 04/18/2024, S2 indicated that Health Service Director (S1) and hospice nurse discussed R1 again stating that they wanted to commit suicide. The hospice nurse removed a pair of scissors from R1’s room and S2 held a follow up discussion with S1 regarding the one-on-one care for R1. S1 addressed to S2 that they did not follow back up with the family regarding the one-on-one care. On the same date 4/18/2024, R1 was found in their bedroom deceased. Continued onto LIC809-C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 S2 stated that after R1 made initial statements about taking their own life, the facility should have updated R1’s needs and services plan to include increased checks. S2 was not aware of why the increased checks were not implemented. S2 admitted that R1’s death could have been prevented if R1 was given one-on-one care sooner and was provided more supervision. The Department additionally conducted interviews with several caregiving staff but found information and statements to be inconsistent with investigation. An immediate civil penalty is being assessed today in the amount of $500 for a violation that resulted in the sickness or injury of a resident in care. Additional Civil Penalty pending review per H&S Code Section 1569.49. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 and the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Appeal Rights Given.

2024-11-07
Complaint Investigation
Unsubstantiated
No findings
Inspector · Dominic Tobola

Plain-language summary

An investigator looked into a complaint that staff weren't running activities with residents and were locking them in bedrooms. During visits to the memory care unit, the investigator observed residents participating in group exercise, pet therapy, music, and yoga activities that matched the facility's activity schedule. The complaint was found to be unsubstantiated due to lack of evidence supporting the allegations.

Read raw inspector notes

Complaint alleges facility staff are not conducting planned activities with residents. Based upon tours of the facility memory care unit LPA observed residents engaging with staff and outside parties with various activities throughout the day. The activities observed included group exercise, pet therapy, music and yoga through multiple visits in accordance with facility activity calendar. Due to a lack of corroborating evidence, the allegation is found to be unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint allegations, facility staff are locking residents in their bedrooms & facility staff are not conducting planned activities with residents are unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.

2024-08-28
Other Visit
Type A · 1 finding
Inspector · Dominic Tobola

Plain-language summary

On August 28, 2024, inspectors conducted a follow-up visit to investigate a self-reported incident from June 7, 2024, when an overnight caregiver intentionally placed a table in front of a resident's bedroom door to prevent wandering. The facility was cited for blocking the resident's door and violating their personal rights; the facility terminated the staff member involved and conducted an internal investigation. The facility has been warned that failure to correct this violation or repeated violations within 12 months may result in civil penalties.

Type A22 CCR §87468.1(a)(6)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87468.1(a)(6)

This was not met as evidence by: Based on a review of facility Incident Report and interviews with LPA Calandra and Executive Director, it was found that staff (S1) was found and admitted to have placed a table in front of resident (R1) bedroom door, preventing R1 from leaving. This is a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

Read raw inspector notes

On 8/28/2024, Licensing Program Analyst, Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of conducting a case management to follow up on a facility self-reported incident and was greeted by Executive Director, Fili Igafo. The incident occurring on 6/7/2024, involved morning staff observing a table that was blocking resident’s (R1) bedroom door. The incident was reported to CCLD by the facility and confirmed based on the report and staff interviews with LPA Calandra, that overnight caregiver staff (S1) intentionally placed table in front of R1’s door to prevent R1 from wandering. LPA Calandra previously gathered information on the incident and spoke with Executive Director on corrective actions. LPA Tobola was informed that the facility had conducted an internal investigation and terminated staff (S1). Due to resident R1's door being obstructed intentionally by staff, the facility has failed to ensure residents room door were unobstructed and violated the personal rights of resident R1. Deficiency cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Appeal rights given. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties.

2024-08-09
Complaint Investigation
Mixed
No findings
Inspector · John Calandra

Plain-language summary

Investigators confirmed that staff did not respond promptly to residents' call buttons—the response log showed waits of up to 289 minutes, and 16 residents waited more than 30 minutes for help within the previous two weeks. Two other complaints—about a resident being left on the floor and about staff failing to monitor health changes—could not be substantiated due to insufficient evidence. The facility was cited for violations related to staffing requirements.

Read raw inspector notes

Regarding the allegation, that staff did not respond to resident’s call button in a timely manner, the Department found through a review of the call button response log that on several occasions, facility staff have taken up to a total of 289 minutes to respond to call buttons. Furthermore, the LPAs learned that within the last 2 weeks, there have been a total of 16 residents who waited more than 30 minutes for assistance. Regarding this allegation, the preponderance of evidence has been met, and the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. The Department has investigated the above allegations of a possible violation of a resident’s personal rights. Based on the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are determined to be SUBSTANTIATED. The deficiencies cited on the following pages are in violation of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, Article 7: Personnel Requirements-General. An exit interview was conducted. This report was reviewed with Fili Igafo, Executive Director and a copy of the report along with Appeal Rights were left at the facility. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Regarding the allegation, that the resident was left on the floor for an extended period of time, LPAs interviewed staff and asked but were not able to procure a copy of the call button response times. Due to a lack of evidence, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. The department has investigated the above allegations that staff did not observe resident’s change of health conditions or reassess resident’s care plan. The allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED meaning that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. This report was reviewed with Fili Igafo, Executive Director and a copy of the report left at the facility.

2024-05-14
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · John Calandra

Plain-language summary

On May 14, 2024, a state licensing official visited the facility to deliver an amended investigation report from an earlier complaint investigation conducted in January 2024. The amended report reflected new information that had come to light during the investigation. The facility's executive director reviewed the report with the official, and a copy was left at the facility.

Read raw inspector notes

On May 14, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility to deliver an Amended complaint investigation report from January 4, 2024. LPA Calandra was greeted by Fili Igafo, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. The report was Amended due to new information being discovered through the course of the investigation LPA Calandra obtained the facility's copy of the report from January 4, 2024. This report was reviewed with Executive Director, Fili Igafo and a copy of the report left at the facility.

2024-05-14
Complaint Investigation
Substantiated
Citation on file
Inspector · John Calandra

Plain-language summary

The Department investigated a complaint that staff failed to call emergency personnel quickly enough. The investigation confirmed the complaint was valid—staff did not contact emergency services in a timely manner as required.

Substantiated — the state found a violation and issued a citation. Full citation details are on file with the state.

Read raw inspector notes

The Department has investigated the complaint allegation that staff did not contact emergency personnel in a timely manner. We have found that the complaint allegation is substantiated. Based on the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. The deficiency cited on the following page is in violation of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8: This report is provided and reviewed with Executive Director, Fili Igafo, and a copy of this report must be made available for public review upon request. Appeal rights discussed and provided.

2024-04-23
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · John Calandra

Plain-language summary

On April 23, 2024, state licensing staff conducted an unannounced health and safety inspection following a resident's death reported to the department the previous day. The inspector reviewed the resident's medical records, care plan, medication records, hospice notes, and other documentation. No violations were found during the inspection.

Read raw inspector notes

On April 23, 2024 at 9:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced Case Management-Health and Safety check in regards to an incident report received by the department on April 22, 2024 regarding the death of a resident. LPA Calandra was greeted by Alan Fox, Regional Operations Specialist and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Calandra requested and received the following documents: -Resident's LIC 602-Physician's report -Annual Needs and Service Plan or Care Plan -Admissions Agreement - Progress notes - Resident's Medication Records - Doctor's orders - Resident Record - Hospice Notes No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. This report was reviewed with Alan Fox, Regional Operations Specialist and a copy of the report left at the facility.

2024-02-15
Annual Compliance Visit
No findings
Inspector · John Calandra

Plain-language summary

This was the facility's required annual inspection on February 15, 2024. The inspector reviewed resident records, interviewed staff and residents, and found no violations or deficiencies. The facility passed inspection.

Read raw inspector notes

On February 15, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility at 9:00 AM to continue the Annual 1-year required inspection. LPA Calandra met with Michelle Herman and explained the purpose of his visit. Faimafili Igafo, Executive Director arrived later during the visit. LPA Calandra reviewed 5 resident records. All were observed to be complete. LPA Calandra interviewed 3 residents and 3 staff. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. The report was reviewed with Faimafili Igafo, Executive Director and a copy of the report left at the facility.

2024-01-04
Complaint Investigation
Unsubstantiated
No findings
Inspector · John Calandra
2023-12-15
Complaint Investigation
Substantiated
Type A · 1 finding
Inspector · Komal Charitra

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that staff did not respond to residents' call buttons in a timely manner; records showed response times ranging from 55 minutes to 2 hours, with multiple residents affected over several months in 2023. The facility was cited for failing to provide basic services and assessed a $1,000 civil penalty for this repeat violation. The facility has the right to appeal this decision.

Type A22 CCR §87465(a)(4)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87465(a)(4)

Based on interviews conducted, a staff member observed another staff member accidentally give R1 one tablet instead of two tablets, however caught the issue and provided R1 with another tablet. Based on record review, there was a discrepancy between a discrepancy between the physician's order and the MAR system being used by the facility, and the prescription bottle that was given by the pharmacy as the MAR system and the physician’s order indicated to provide R1 with one 200mg tablet of Lamotrigine daily, however the prescription bottle from the pharmacy indicated to provide R1 with two 100mg of Lamotrigine tablets daily. Nevertheless, the facility failed to provide R1 with his/her Lamotrigine prescription as prescribed by R1’s physician and follow up with R1's physician and/or the pharmacy for clarification

Read raw inspector notes

Regarding the allegation, staff do not answer resident's call button in a timely manner, according to the reporting party, within the last six months, there has been issues with staff not responding to call buttons. In addition, according to the reporting party, R1 pressed his/her call button for help and was left waiting for two hours. During the investigation, LPA reviewed R1’s call records and observed on 11/20/2023, R1 pressed his/her call button at 7:44am, however a staff did not respond to R1’s call button request until 8:52am, 67 minutes after pressing the call button. In addition, on 9/26/23, R1 pressed his/her call button at 7:43am and a staff member did not respond to the call pendant till 8:38am, 55 minutes after pressing the call pendant. In addition to reviewing R1’s record, additional resident records were reviewed. During additional record review, LPA observed Resident 2 (R2) pressed his/her call button on 9/8/23 at 6:46am and staff responded 120 minutes later at 8:52am. Furthermore, R2 pressed his/her call button on 9/7/23 at 11:13am and staff did not respond till 12:33am, 80 minutes after R2 pressed his/her button for assistance. Based on interviews, observations and record review during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegations were determined to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. §1569.312 Basic services(a)- A civil penalty of $1,000 is assessed on 12/15/2023 for a repeat violation within 12 months. This violation was cited on 7/5/2023. Report was discussed with Executive Director, Ella Frick and a copy is provided with appeal rights. A copy of civil penalty is provided.

2023-09-23
Other Visit
Type B · 3 findings
Inspector · Christina Valerio

Plain-language summary

This was a routine annual inspection of the 5-floor facility. Inspectors found the building clean and well-maintained, with clear emergency exits, proper food and water supplies, and medications and hazardous materials securely locked away; however, they cited deficiencies including 8 out of 10 resident files missing required documentation and 4 out of 10 missing resident appraisals, and noted that the facility's licensing fees were past due. The facility was asked to submit additional documentation and was advised that failure to correct these issues could result in civil penalties.

Type B22 CCR §87203
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87203

Based on observation of 2 elevators, the licensee did not ensure elevators were inspected annually in 2 out of 2 which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 10/23/2023 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Licensee will schedule a inspection for the elevators and send updated certification to LPA by POC due date.

Type B22 CCR §87458(a)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87458(a)

Based on records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 8 out of 10 resident files, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 10/23/2023 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Licensee will send a statement of acknowledgement of regulation 87458 by POC due date and ensure all residents have a current LIC 602 located in their file.

Type B22 CCR §87463(c)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87463(c)

Based on records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 4 out of 10 resident files, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 10/23/2023 Plan of Correction 1 2 3 4 Licensee will review regulation 87463 and send a statement of understanding to LPA by POC due date. Licensee will ensure that all residents files have a current Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan.

Read raw inspector notes

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio and LPA Arielle Pascua arrived to the facility unannounced to conduct an annual required inspection. LPA met with front desk staff, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs were met by Marketing Director (MD), Michelle Herman, and informed us that Administrator Ella Frick appointed Michelle to carry out the visit. LPAs toured the physical plant with MD Herman to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. The facility is a 5 floor building with Assisted Living Rooms and a Memory Care Living Space. LPAs toured each floor and inspected random resident apartments. Rooms were observed to be clean, organized, free from debris, and free from odors. All emergency exits were clear from obstructions. Common areas and dinning rooms were observed to be clean. Water temperature in the bathrooms delivered hot water at 109.8 degrees Fahrenheit and 114.3 degrees. Kitchen areas were observed to be clean and free from any debris. The facility was observed to have a food supply to meet the requirements of non-perishable food items for 7 days and perishable items for 2 days. An emergency supply of food and water was observed in a locked storage area. Medications, cleaning supplies, and toxins were observed to locked away and inaccessible to residents in care. LPAs observed 2 elevators. The inspections for the annual inspection had an expiration date of 01/24/2019. According to MD Herman, the City has not done inspections due to COVID, however, the Maintenance Director will follow up to see if inspections have resumed. Residents in the Assisted Living areas were observed to be enjoying pastries and coffee in the cafe, watching a movie in the cinema room, eating snacks, engaging in family visits, reading newspapers, and walking around the building. Staff were observed assisting residents, cleaning common areas and apartments, assisting with medications, and completing administrative tasks. Continues on LIC 809-C... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Continued from LIC 809 LPAs inspected 10 resident files. 8 out of 10 resident files reviewed did not have an updated LIC 602 or an LIC 602 located in the file. 4 out of 10 resident files reviewed did not have a resident appraisal on file. LPAs inspected 5 staff files. Staff files were observed to be current and up to date. LPAs spoke to Administrator Ella Frick via cell phone to discuss licensing fees that were observed to be past due. Administrator Ella stated that it may be an administrative error and will provided additional information to LPA on 09/25/23. Technical Assistance was provided. LPA requested the following documentation be sent to their assigned LPA/Regional Office: LIC 500, LIC 308, Liability Insurance Information, and LIC 610D Per California Code of Regulations (CCR) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies are being cited today on the LIC 809 - D page. Failure to correct deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Appeal Rights were provided. An exit interview was held with MD Herman, and a copy of the report was provided in-person.

2023-07-05
Other Visit
No findings
Inspector · Murial Han

Plain-language summary

On an unannounced visit in July 2023, inspectors investigated a complaint about a fall that occurred early on the morning of April 20, 2023. A resident fell and pressed the call button, but facility staff did not respond for over 3 hours; during that time, the resident's roommate had to get the fallen resident off the floor and back into bed without staff help. The facility was cited for failure to respond to the resident's call for assistance.

Read raw inspector notes

On July 5, 2023 Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced case management visit to deliver the findings in reference to complaint # 14-AS-20230425173240. LPA met with administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, Resident 1 (R1) stated that early morning of 4/20/2023 around 5-6AM, R1's roommate resident #2 (R2) fell. R1 pressed the call cords in the room and after a long period of waiting, R1 went outside of the room pleading for assistance, however, no one was available. Therefore, R1 went back to the room and assisted R2 off of the floor, back into bed. According to the documentation provided by the facility, on 4/20/2023, it did not indicate that facility staff provided assistance to R2 after the fall. Based on the complaint investigation, on the day of the fall, it took facility staff 205 minutes and 46 seconds to respond to R1's call cord and no one was available to assist R2 back to bed after fall which resulted R1 assisting R2 off of the floor and back to bed. Deficient is cited under California Health and Safety Code on the LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report was discussed and reviewed with administrator. A copy of this report and the Appeal Rights is provided.

2023-07-05
Complaint Investigation
Mixed
Type A · 2 findings
Inspector · Murial Han

Plain-language summary

A complaint investigation found that a resident was served raw bell peppers and onions despite a doctor's order for soft food that the resident could chew—the facility later met with the resident and made improvements. The investigation also found that when the resident's roommate fell on April 20, 2023, the resident pressed the call cord multiple times but staff did not respond for over three hours, leaving the resident to help their roommate back to bed without assistance. A separate complaint about laundry services was found to be unsubstantiated.

Type A22 CCR §87468.1(a)(2)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87468.1(a)(2)

it took facility staff 205 minutes and 46 seconds to reset R1's call cord which posed an immediate health risk to residents in care.

Type B22 CCR §87555(d)(7)
Verbatim citation text · 22 CCR §87555(d)(7)

as evidenced by: R1 has a physician's order for mechanical soft diet, however, facility served R1 raw vegetables and other foods that R1 was not to chew which posed a potential health risk to resident in care.

Read raw inspector notes

Based on documentation provided by the facility, R1 has a physician's order for mechanical soft diet, however, R1 was served raw bell peppers, and raw onions and R1 has provided written communication to facility directors reporting this incident. According to facility Chef, he/she and the memory care director met with R1 on 5/18/2023 to reviewed R1's food preferences and improvements have been made. According to facility staff, R1 has received food items that R1 was not able to chew and alternates were given upon R1's request. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be substantiated as R1 was served a diet that was not prescribed by the physician. Regarding to allegation of facility did not respond to resident's emergency cord, the reporting party stated on 4/20/2023 early morning, R1's roommate resident #2 (R2) fell and R1 pressed multiple call cords in the room, however, it was not responded by staff resulted R1 who has unsteady gait assisted R2 back into the bed. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed R1, interviewed administrator, and reviewed facility records. R1 stated that on 4/20/2023 around 5- 6am, R1's roommate fell and R1 pressed the call cords in the room but no one came; R1 went outside of the room pleading for assistance but no one was around so R1 had to assist R2 back to bed. According to the Device Activity Report(this report reveals the call cord response time) that was provided by the facility, it revealed that on 4/20/2023, call cord was activated in R1 and R2's room at 5:53AM and the reset time was 205 minutes and 46 seconds and according to the administrator, the reset time was the time when staff answered the call cord and reset it. Furthermore, LPA observed on the same report that another apartment on 5/3/2023, call cord was activated at 2:32 AM and the reset time was 210 minutes and 42 seconds. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 After the investigation this allegation is deemed to be substantiated. In addition, a separate deficiency will be issued on a LIC 809 (Case Management Report) as facility staff failed to assist R2 back to bed after the fall. Based on interviews, observations and record review during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, this allegations were determined to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report was discussed with Administrator, A copy is provided and Appeal Rights provided. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 According to R1, it was difficult to get laundry services in the beginning of R1's stay but now R1 prefers to have the weekly laundry service that is provided by someone from an agency. According to the memory care director and the former administrator, R1's laundry services is provided by someone who comes in once a week but facility will do it if needed as indicated on R1's individual service plan. Based on interviews, observations and record reviews during the course of the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. This report is reviewed and discussed with the administrator. A copy is provided.

8 older inspections from 2022 are not shown above.

Get the complete record, translated into plain language — emailed to you.

Family reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to share your experience

Related in this city

Other memory care options nearby.

Is this listing wrong? Report an issue →
Reports help us maintain accurate facility information. Your report will be reviewed within 1-2 business days.
Editorial Independence

The memory care site on the family's side: StarlynnCare receives no referral commissions, lead fees, or paid placement from facilities.